The Written Assignment General Comments Ibsen The Good

The Written Assignment General Comments

Ibsen • The Good: • Focused analysis. • Most consistent in creating culture and context. • The Bad: • Incorrect Citations. • Most redundant. • Lacking techniques. • The Ugly: • The characters are not real! • Most plot-driven analysis. http: //highered. mheduca tion. com/sites/007240522 8/student_view 0/drama_g lossary. html (More Drama Literary Terms)

Neruda • The Good: • Best literary analysis with most literary devices! • Most concise. • The Bad: • Missing structure discussion. • Incorrect citations. • The Ugly: • Slippery slope of history paper. • Passive voice (Neruda missing). Speaker vs. Narrator (prove it’s Neruda b/c it’s not always the case) Metonymy (one thing stands for something else that is closely related to it (For example, using the phrase "the crown" to refer to the king would be an example of metonymy. ) Synechdoche (a part stands in for a whole (For example, in the phrase "all hands on deck, " "hands" stands in for the people in the ship's crew. )

Ninh • The Good: • Most diverse and unique analysis. • Developed analysis (the effect). • The Bad: • Missed opportunities for culture and context. • Lack of textual evidence (a lot of telling vs. showing). • The Ugly: • Kien is not Ninh. • Lack of direction/organization.

General Comments • The Good: • Much improved since the beginning of the year (was bragging just a bit to a friend!) • The Bad: • Literary Vocabulary is missing. • MLA Formatting (1. 5 spacing, heading, page numbers) • Works Cited Page? • The Ugly: • Academic Tone • Proofreading – lack of attention to detail.