The Study of VisuallyInduced Postural Responses Using Virtual

  • Slides: 28
Download presentation
The Study of Visually-Induced Postural Responses Using Virtual Environments Sparto PJ, Furman JM, Jacobson

The Study of Visually-Induced Postural Responses Using Virtual Environments Sparto PJ, Furman JM, Jacobson JL, Whitney SL, Hodges LF, Redfern MS Department of Otolaryngology University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA Sponsors: Eye and Ear Foundation, NIH: DC 02490, DC 05205, K 25 AG 001049

Collaborators Rolf Jacob, MD Kathryn Brown, MS, PT Jeffrey Jasko, BS Leigh Mahoney, MS

Collaborators Rolf Jacob, MD Kathryn Brown, MS, PT Jeffrey Jasko, BS Leigh Mahoney, MS Chad Wingrave, MS

Visually-Induced Postural Sway Research • Vestibular disorders (Redfern and Furman, 1994) • Anxiety disorders

Visually-Induced Postural Sway Research • Vestibular disorders (Redfern and Furman, 1994) • Anxiety disorders (Jacob et al. , 1995) • Healthy elders (Borger et al. , 1999) • Adaptation (Loughlin et al. , 1996, Loughlin and Redfern, 2001)

Limitations • Single rear-projected screen • Restricted in field of view (60 deg) •

Limitations • Single rear-projected screen • Restricted in field of view (60 deg) • Not able to study peripheral motion cues • Modified Equitest platform • Pitch motion only • Frequency and amplitude range limited

Balance NAVE Automatic Virtual Environment (BNAVE) • Spatially-Immersive VR Facility used to generate moving

Balance NAVE Automatic Virtual Environment (BNAVE) • Spatially-Immersive VR Facility used to generate moving visual environments • Can control many factors: • Field of view (180 o H x 110 o V) • Spatial and temporal characteristics of movement • Spatial frequency • Monoscopic & stereoscopic

BNAVE Layout

BNAVE Layout

Sensory Integration • Modified Neurotest posture platform • Pitch and A-P translation • Treadmill

Sensory Integration • Modified Neurotest posture platform • Pitch and A-P translation • Treadmill • Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation

Subjects • Healthy Adults (CON) • 5 Males, 6 Females • Age 32 -

Subjects • Healthy Adults (CON) • 5 Males, 6 Females • Age 32 - 66 years, mean 49 + 11 yrs • No abnormalities on clinical vestibular tests • Adults with Unilateral Vestibular Loss (UVL) • 5 Males, 6 Females • Age 32 - 66 years, mean 49 + 11 yrs • 10 - 72 months post vestibular n. section

Stimulus • Frequency of Movement • 0. 1 Hz • 0. 25 Hz •

Stimulus • Frequency of Movement • 0. 1 Hz • 0. 25 Hz • RMS velocity was 1. 2 m/s for both freq.

Data Analysis • A-P Head Position sampled at 20 Hz using electromagnetic tracker •

Data Analysis • A-P Head Position sampled at 20 Hz using electromagnetic tracker • RMS amplitude of sway computed at stimulus frequency • Linear, Time-Invariant and Dynamic Systems Analyses

Adults – CON v. UVL

Adults – CON v. UVL

Head PSD Phase-locked 70 50 30 10 0 0. 1 0. 3 0. 5

Head PSD Phase-locked 70 50 30 10 0 0. 1 0. 3 0. 5 Frequency (Hz) 0. 7 0. 9 Head Sway (cm) 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 10 20 30 40 Time (sec) 50 60 70 80

Not Phase-locked Head PSD 4 3 2 1 0 0. 1 0. 3 0.

Not Phase-locked Head PSD 4 3 2 1 0 0. 1 0. 3 0. 5 Frequency (Hz) 0. 7 0. 9 Head Sway (cm) 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 10 20 30 40 Time (sec) 50 60 70 80

Phase-locking behavior Controls (n=11) Subjects with Unilateral Vestibular Loss (n=11) 0. 1 Hz 0.

Phase-locking behavior Controls (n=11) Subjects with Unilateral Vestibular Loss (n=11) 0. 1 Hz 0. 25 Hz Primary peak in PSD at stimulus frequency 7 4 6 4 Phase-lock during 1 st cycle 4 4 Phase-lock for all subsequent cycles 5 3 4 3

90 3 120 60 Phase v. Frequency 2 150 30 1 180 0 210

90 3 120 60 Phase v. Frequency 2 150 30 1 180 0 210 330 240 300 270 UVL – 0. 1 CON – 0. 1 UVL – 0. 25 CON – 0. 25

90 3 120 60 CON v. UVL 0. 1 Hz 2 150 30 1

90 3 120 60 CON v. UVL 0. 1 Hz 2 150 30 1 180 0 210 330 UVL – 0. 1 CON – 0. 1 240 300 270

90 3 120 60 CON v. UVL 0. 25 Hz 2 150 30 1

90 3 120 60 CON v. UVL 0. 25 Hz 2 150 30 1 180 0 210 330 240 300 270 UVL – 0. 25 CON – 0. 25

Conclusions • Peripheral stimulus induces sway in ½ subjects at 0. 1 Hz, and

Conclusions • Peripheral stimulus induces sway in ½ subjects at 0. 1 Hz, and 1/3 subjects at 0. 25 Hz • Subjects with compensated UVL sway the same amount as controls • Subjects with UVL have different timing at 0. 25 Hz

Adults v. Children (8 -12 y. o. ) • Healthy Adults (CON) • 5

Adults v. Children (8 -12 y. o. ) • Healthy Adults (CON) • 5 Males, 6 Females • Age 32 - 66 years, mean 49 + 11 yrs • No abnormalities on clinical vestibular tests • Children • 5 Males, 5 Females • Age 8 - 12 years, mean 10 + 1 yrs • No abnormalities on clinical vestibular tests

Healthy Adults v. Children

Healthy Adults v. Children

Conclusions • Greater sway at higher frequencies • Children aged 8 -12 years still

Conclusions • Greater sway at higher frequencies • Children aged 8 -12 years still do not show adult pattern of visually-induced sway • Vestibular and somatosensory threshold for postural control may be higher

Conclusions • Visually-induced postural sway is a complex problem, dependent on many factors •

Conclusions • Visually-induced postural sway is a complex problem, dependent on many factors • visual field of view • optic flow structure • spatial and temporal frequency of stimulus • Relevant to many clinical problems

Current Areas of Research • Visual Influences in Height Phobia • Visual Influences in

Current Areas of Research • Visual Influences in Height Phobia • Visual Influences in Migraine • Vestibular Rehabilitation using VR