The Second Capacity Building Workshop on Low Carbon
The Second Capacity Building Workshop on “Low Carbon Development and Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions” Alternative Policy Scenarios For Renewable Energy Development in Viet Nam By: Nguyen Minh Bao Institute of Energy 16 -18 December 2013, Do Son, Hai Phong, Viet Nam
Contents • • Introduction Methodology and Data Results of Energy Outlook-BAU APS Scenarios for RE Development ü Assumptions for APS Scenarios ü Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU • Key Findings
Introduction • Climate change is one of the most complex problems that seriously threats to the global issues. • Vietnam is considered one of countries most vulnerable to climate change. • Continuing the TNA project sponsored by UNEP to identify the priority technology needs and the adaptive and mitigation technologies, Viet Nam was selected for implementing FIRM project. • This study is one of three main components of FIRM project, aiming to FIRM project, develop a national low carbon development framework and indentify the NAMA priorities
Methodology and Data v Methodology • The objective of this study is to develop APS Scenario for RE to achieve the target of 5 percentage of RE in total primary commercial supply by 2020. • Firstly, Firstly a BAU scenario was developed for outlining future energy consumption with assumption of no any change on energy policies. • An APS was also designed based on: ü Accessible potential of all types of RE ü National targets for RE development with assuming that additional policies would be developed or likely to be under consideration. • The difference between the BAU and APS represents the additional RE consumption and potential fossil energy savings as well as potential GHG reduction.
Methodology and Data v Methodology • LEAP model, an LEAP model, accounting system was used to develop energy balance tables based on final energy consumption and energy input/output in the transformation sector. • Final energy demand forecasting was estimated for each sector such as industry, transport, agriculture, commercial and residential sectors. • Final energy demand for the sectors (except residential sector) is forecasted using energy demand equations by energy and sector and future macroeconomic assumptions. • Residential energy demand was estimated by using the bottom-up method that energy demand was broken down in to sub-sector, end-uses etc. • Primary energy requirements were estimated based on the future choice for technologies, programs and available energy supply in the future.
Methodology and Data v Data were taken from the following souces: • Energy Balances for Non-OECD Countries compiled by the International Energy Agency (IEA) with the historical energy data available for using the econometric approach. • Statistics Year Book of Viet Nam and World Development Indicators published by the World Bank. • Other data such as population and population growth rates were obtained from Statistics Year Book. • Where official data were not available, estimates were obtained from other sources or Institute of Energy (IE).
Methodology and Data • GDP assumptions* ü 6. 96% per year from 2011 to 2015 ü 7. 0% per year from 2016 to 2020 ü 7. 22% per year from 2021 to 2030 ü 6. 8% per year from 2030 to 2035 • Share of GDP* 2010 2015 2020 2030 Industry 42. 42% 41. 00% 42. 01% 41. 41% Agriculture 16. 43% 17. 10% 15. 00% 10. 10% * National Power Master Plan (2010 -2030)
Methodology and Data • Population assumptions (Mill. persons)*: 2010 2015 2020 86. 93 91. 583 96. 179 2025 2030 2035 100. 129 103. 117 105. 388 • Urbanization Rate * ü 2010: 30. 5% ü 2015: 33. 6% ü 2025: 40. 7% ü 2035: 48. 2% * Source: General Statistics Office, 2011 - Viet Nam Population Forecasts 2009 -2049 * Source:
Methodology and Data * Changes in Technology - Base year 2010 thermal efficiencies by fuel type (coal, gas, and oil) were derived from Energy Balance Tables. - Thermal efficiencies by fuel (coal, gas, and oil) in the Viet Nam were projected based on the forecasting future power plant technologies in USDOE’s Annual Energy Outlook, 2008. * Renewable Energy Technologies Installed electricity generating capacity from renewable energy is assumed based on: - Current status of policies and RE application - RE potential and planning to develop RE technologies In BAU, it assumed that RE would reach to 4300 MW in 2030 with small hydro contributing 4000 MW wind 200 MW, and biomass 100 MW.
Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Final Energy Demand by Sector, BAU Unit: MTOE Annual Average Growth Rate (%) 19902010 2030 1990 2015 2020 2030 Residential 9. 5 10. 8 12. 1 14. 0 20. 2 0. 6 3. 2 Industry 4. 5 17. 5 23. 4 31. 9 54. 5 7. 0 5. 8 Transportation 1. 4 11. 1 15. 2 20. 6 34. 1 10. 9 5. 7 Agriculture 0. 2 0. 6 0. 8 1. 0 1. 2 4. 6 3. 6 Commercial 0. 3 1. 8 2. 6 3. 8 7. 8 8. 6 7. 7 16. 0 41. 8 54. 1 71. 2 117. 8 4. 9 5. 3 Total
Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Final Energy Demand by Sector, BAU
Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Share of Final Energy Demand by Sector, BAU Unit: % 2010 2020 2030 Residential 25. 8 19. 6 17. 2 Industry 41. 9 44. 8 46. 3 Transportation 26. 7 28. 9 Agriculture 1. 5 1. 4 1. 1 Commercial 4. 2 5. 3 6. 6 Total 100 100
Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Final Energy Demand by Fuel, BAU Unit: MTOE 1990 2015 2020 2030 Solid Fuels (Coal) 1. 3 9. 9 12. 6 16. 4 Oil 2. 4 15. 3 20. 9 Natural gas 0. 0 0. 5 Electricity 0. 5 Biomass Renewable Total Annual Average Growth Rate (%) 199020102030 24. 1 10. 6 4. 6 28. 0 46. 8 9. 8 5. 7 0. 8 1. 3 2. 7 - 8. 9 7. 5 12. 7 20. 1 42. 3 14. 1 9. 1 11. 8 8. 6 6. 9 5. 2 1. 2 -1. 6 -9. 3 0. 02 0. 1 0. 4 0. 7 - 19. 6 16. 0 41. 8 54. 1 71. 2 117. 8 4. 9 5. 3
Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Final Energy Demand by Fuel, BAU
Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Share of Final Energy Demand by Fuel, BAU Unit: % 1990 2010 2030 Solid Fuels (Coal) 8. 3 23. 7 20. 5 Oil 14. 7 36. 7 39. 7 Natural gas 0. 0 1. 2 2. 3 Electricity 3. 3 17. 9 35. 9 Biomass 73. 7 20. 5 1. 0 Renewables 0. 04 0. 6 Total 100 100
Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Power Generation Output, BAU Unit: Bill. k. Wh 1990 2010 2030 AAGR 2010/1990 AAGR 2030/2010 Coal 2. 0 17. 0 302. 1 11. 3 15. 5 Oil 1. 3 4. 6 0. 3 6. 4 -12. 9 Natural gas 0. 0 43. 1 81. 0 55. 9 3. 2 Nuclear 0. 0 58. 5 - - Hydro 5. 4 25. 9 64. 7 8. 2 4. 7 Renewables 0. 0 1. 8 12. 9 - 10. 2 Total 8. 7 92. 3 519. 3 12. 5 9. 0
Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Power Generation Output, BAU (Bill. k. Wh)
Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Share of Power Generation Output, BAU Unit: % 1990 2010 2030 Coal 23. 1 18. 4 58. 2 Oil 15. 0 4. 9 0. 1 Natural Gas 0. 1 46. 6 15. 6 Nuclear 0. 0 11. 3 Hydro 61. 8 28. 0 12. 5 Renewables 0. 0 2. 5 Total 100 100
Primary Energy Supply, BAU Unit: MTOE Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Primary Energy Supply, BAU Unit: MTOE AAGR (%) Solid Fuels (Coal) Oil Natural gas Nuclear Hydro Biomass Renewables Imported electricity Total 1990 2015 2020 2030 2. 2 14. 6 27. 8 44. 3 91. 8 9. 9 9. 6 2. 7 0. 0 0. 5 11. 6 0. 0 17. 7 8. 4 0. 0 2. 2 8. 6 0. 3 21. 2 8. 4 0. 0 3. 8 7. 0 1. 0 29. 1 12. 3 1. 2 4. 9 5. 2 1. 6 48. 7 18. 1 15. 2 5. 6 1. 3 2. 5 9. 8 48. 7 8. 2 -1. 5 - 5. 2 3. 9 4. 7 -9. 0 11. 0 0. 4 0. 6 0. 9 1. 4 - 6. 4 17. 0 52. 2 69. 8 99. 3 184. 5 5. 8 6. 5 1990 - 2010 2030
Primary Energy Supply, BAU Unit: MTOE Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Share of Primary Energy Supply, BAU Unit: % 1990 2010 2030 Solid Fuels (Coal) 13. 1 27. 9 49. 8 Oil 16. 1 33. 9 26. 4 Natural gas 0. 0 16. 1 9. 8 Nuclear 0. 0 8. 3 Hydro 2. 7 4. 3 3. 0 Biomass 68. 1 16. 5 0. 7 Renewables Imported electricity Total 0. 0 0. 6 1. 3 0. 0 0. 7 100 100
Primary Energy Supply, BAU Unit: MTOE Results of Energy Outlook-BAU GHG Emissions, BAU Unit: Million Tonnes of CO 2 e 1. Energy Industry Electricity Generation Gas Production Crude oil production Coal Production 2. Energy Consumption Residential Industry Transport Agriculture Commercial Total (1+2) 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 AAGR 2010 -30 50. 3 38. 6 0. 7 5. 3 5. 6 91. 4 11. 4 40. 2 33. 5 1. 6 4. 8 141. 7 86. 9 74. 3 0. 7 3. 4 8. 5 120. 6 13. 9 52. 5 45. 3 2. 2 6. 7 207. 4 148. 7 129. 6 0. 9 5. 7 12. 5 158. 9 16. 5 69. 8 60. 7 2. 5 9. 4 307. 7 212. 8 189. 1 0. 8 5. 6 17. 3 200. 3 18. 8 87. 9 77. 7 2. 9 13 413. 2 323. 7 294. 7 0. 6 5. 5 22. 9 252. 7 20. 9 110. 9 99. 7 3. 2 18 576. 4 9. 8% 10. 7% -0. 8% 0. 3% 7. 3% 5. 2% 3. 1% 5. 2% 5. 6% 3. 4% 6. 9% 7. 3%
Results of Energy Outlook-BAU Energy Indicators of BAU 2010 2020 2030 GDP (billions of 1994 USD) 62. 8 123. 4 247. 7 Population (millions of people) 86. 9 96. 2 103. 1 0. 7 1. 3 2. 4 Primary energy consumption per capita (toe/person) 0. 60 1. 03 1. 79 Primary energy consumption per unit of GDP (toe/million 1994 USD) 832 805 745 2, 257 2, 493 2, 327 2. 71 3. 10 3. 12 GDP per capita (thousands of 1994 USD/person) CO 2 emissions per unit of GDP (t-CO 2/million 1994 USD) CO 2 emissions per unit of primary energy consumption (t -C/toe)
APS Scenarios for RE Development Assumptions for APS Scenarios This section focuses on development of APS for RE to achieve the target 5% of RE in total primary commercial supply by 2020 based on the existing planning and programs with assumptions that additional policies would be developed. v Small hydro power plants substitute for coal thermal power plants Installed Capacity of SHP (MW) Scenarios 2012* 2015 2025 BAU 1, 269. 4 2, 600 4, 000 APS 1, 269. 4 2, 950 5, 600 * Source: Statistic Data until Sep. 2012, General Department of Energy, MOIT
40 MW in 2010 to 60 MW in 2020 and 100 MW in 2030. APS Scenarios for RE Development Assumptions for APS Scenarios v Biomass power plants substitute for coal thermal power plants Installed Capacity of Biomass PP (MW) Scenarios 2010 2015 2030 BAU 40 60 100 APS 40 500* 2000* * Source: Decision No. 1208/2011/QD-TTg, 2011 on approval of the National Power Development Plan for the 2011 - 2020 period with a vision to 2030.
40 MW in 2010 to 60 MW in 2020 and 100 MW in 2030. APS Scenarios for RE Development Assumptions for APS Scenarios v Wind power plants substitute for coal thermal power plants Wind power • The total potential of wind energy in Vietnam is estimated to be as high as 26, 700 MW (at speeds over 6 m/s)*. • There have been 48 projects on wind power development registered (until May 2011) with the total registered capacity of 5, 000 MW. • Assumption: Installed Capacity of WPP (MW) Scenarios 2011 2015 2030 BAU 30 100 200 APS 30 1000** 6200** * World Bank (2001) Wind Energy Resource Atlas of Southeast Asia. ** Decision No. 1208/2011/QD-TTg, 2011 on approval of the National PDP VII.
40 MW in 2010 to 60 MW in 2020 and 100 MW in 2030. APS Scenarios for RE Development Assumptions for APS Scenarios v Biogas Energy • Biogas stoves substitute for coal stoves: By 2030, the share of HH using biogas stoves will increase to 12. 0% from 2. 0% (in BAU) in rural areas. Each household used biogas consumes 0. 16 TOE per year, while old coal stoves consumes around 0. 4 TOE per year. • Biogas stoves substitute for LPG stoves: By 2030, the share of HH using biogas stoves will increase to 12. 0% from 2. 0% (in BAU) in rural areas. Each household used biogas consumes 0. 16 TOE per year, while LPG stoves consumes 0. 143 TOE per year.
40 MW in 2010 to 60 MW in 2020 and 100 MW in 2030. APS Scenarios for RE Development Assumptions for APS Scenarios v Biogas Energy • Biogas power plants substitute for coal thermal power plants Installed Capacity of Biogas PP (MW) Scenarios 2010 2015 2030 BAU 0 0 0 APS 0 30 60
40 MW in 2010 to 60 MW in 2020 and 100 MW in 2030. APS Scenarios for RE Development Assumptions for APS Scenarios v Solar water heaters substitute for electric water heaters By 2030, it assumes that the share of HH used SWH will increase to 70% in urban and 40% in rural areas (from 10% and 3% in BAU) to replace to electricity heaters. v Bio-ethanol fuel substitutes for gasoline in transportation Amount of ethanol substituted for gasoline (KTOE) Scenarios 2010 2015 2030 BAU 0. 10 300 600 APS 0. 10 556* 1150* * Source: Based on the project for bio-energy development up to 2015 with a vision to 2025
Final Energy Demand by Fuels, APS vs. BAU APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU Final Energy Demand by Fuels, APS vs. BAU Unit: KTOE 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Biomass 0 0 0 Electricity 0 -28. 1 -108. 6 -257. 6 -511. 1 Natural Gas 0 0 0 Oil Products 0 -137. 2 -340. 1 -538. 4 -736. 3 Renewables 0 228. 9 580. 4 998. 4 1519. 7 Solid fuels (Coal) 0 -150. 5 -291. 1 -415. 3 -516 Total 0 -87 -159. 4 -213. 0 -243. 7
Final Energy Demand by Fuels, APS vs. BAU APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU Final Energy Demand by Fuels, APS vs. BAU
APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU Primary Energy Demand by Fuels, APS vs. BAU Unit: KTOE 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Solid Fuels 0 -802. 3 -1970. 2 -3950. 4 -5981. 6 Oil 0 -111. 5 -265. 1 -485. 9 -773. 1 Natural Gas 0 28. 6 34. 8 -71. 5 -109. 1 Nuclear 0 0. 0 4. 4 -41. 3 -128. 6 Hydropower 0 14. 5 18. 5 -29. 4 -46. 9 Biomass 0 156. 3 398. 9 1083. 2 1848. 4 Renewables 0 1484. 3 3421. 0 5651. 8 7907. 4 Electricity (Imported) 0 1. 5 4. 0 6. 4 -42. 3 Total 0 771. 4 1646. 3 2162. 9 2674. 2
Power Generation Input by Fuel-Energy Types APS vs. BAU Unit: KTOE APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU Power Generation Input by Fuel-Energy Types APS vs. BAU Unit: KTOE Coal In which: - Anthracite - Import Coal Oil Natural Gas Nuclear Hydro Small Hydro Wind Biomass Biogas Total 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 -651. 8 -1, 679. 1 -3, 535. 1 -5, 465. 6 0 -538. 1 -1, 400. 7 -2, 328. 6 -3, 165. 4 0 -113. 7 -278. 4 -1, 206. 5 -2, 300. 2 0 0. 0 -72. 7 0 25. 5 34. 8 -71. 5 -109. 1 0 0. 0 4. 4 -41. 3 -128. 6 0 14. 5 18. 5 -29. 4 -46. 9 0 90. 8 238. 6 389. 5 406. 4 0 42. 6 108. 8 425. 9 778. 4 0 156. 3 398. 9 1, 083. 2 1, 848. 4 0 10. 8 36. 2 55. 6 77. 9 0 -311. 2 -838. 8 -1, 723. 1 -2, 711. 9
APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU v Evaluation of the Share of Renewable Energy The basic principles for calculating the share of RE in total primary commercial energy sources are based on the outputs of yearly energy balance tables determined as follows: * Primary commercial energy sources include crude oil, oil products imported, coal exploited and imported, natural gas exploited and imported, nuclear fuel, electricity imported (and not including fuel-energy exported). * Primary RE sources include small hydro, wind, solar, animal waste for producing biogas, cassava for producing ethanol and biomass fuels for power generation (not including biomass for residential cooking).
Primary Energy Supply by Energy Types in APS Up to 2030 Unit: KTOE APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU Primary Energy Supply by Energy Types in APS Up to 2030 Unit: KTOE Coal Oil Natural Gas Nuclear Hydro Biomass In which: for power generation Animal Wastes Cassava Small Hydro Solar Wind Electricity Imported Total 2010 14591. 8 17674. 1 8423. 8 0. 0 2224. 1 2015 27036. 7 21101. 8 8405. 9 0. 0 3784. 6 2020 42282. 6 28869. 5 12291. 8 1171. 6 4871. 5 2025 57018. 9 36910. 7 16511. 2 7184. 8 5112. 5 2030 85813. 9 47866. 8 17941. 8 15100. 6 5512. 7 8607. 0 7140. 9 5612. 1 4394. 1 3168. 8 40. 0 162. 6 0. 2 144. 8 0. 5 0. 0 390. 2 52219. 1 205. 3 1403. 5 276. 9 744. 3 33. 7 50. 3 624. 9 70604. 0 453. 1 1157. 7 1946. 6 2870. 3 4318. 3 5782. 3 846. 2 1307. 7 1769. 2 1033. 0 1383. 1 1453. 4 126. 9 298. 4 589. 8 120. 8 444. 6 804. 6 854. 4 1082. 8 1311. 2 100951. 0 135967. 2 187115. 0
APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU Primary Energy Supply by Energy Types in APS Up to 2030 Unit: KTOE Total Primary Energy Total Primary Commercial Energy Total Primary Renewable Energy Share of RE/TPCE 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 52219. 1 70604. 0 100951. 0 135967. 2 187115. 0 41079. 9 57169. 3 85469. 9 348. 1 2714. 0 5450. 3 8909. 8 12345. 9 0. 8% 4. 7% 6. 4% 7. 5% 7. 4% 118708. 4 168034. 3
APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU The Share of Renewable Energy by Types of Technology 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Biomass for power generation 0. 10% 0. 36% 0. 53% 0. 98% 1. 16% Cassava for ethanol production 0. 00% 0. 48% 0. 99% 1. 10% 1. 05% Animal Wastes for biogas 0. 40% 2. 45% 3. 36% 3. 64% 3. 44% Small Hydro 0. 35% 1. 30% 1. 21% 1. 17% 0. 86% Solar 0. 00% 0. 06% 0. 15% 0. 25% 0. 35% Wind 0. 00% 0. 09% 0. 14% 0. 37% 0. 48% Total 0. 85% 4. 75% 6. 38% 7. 51% 7. 35%
APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU GHG Reduction Potential Unit: Million Tones CO 2 e 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 AAGR 2010 -2030 APS 141. 7 203. 7 298. 6 395. 3 549. 5 7. 0% BAU 141. 7 207. 4 307. 7 413. 2 576. 4 7. 3% Reduction 0 -3. 7 -9. 1 -17. 9 -26. 9 -0. 3%
APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU GHG Reduction Potential
APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU GHG Reduction Potential in Power Generation Unit: Million Tones CO 2 e 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 AAGR 2010 -2030 APS 38. 6 71. 7 123 174. 9 272. 6 10. 3% BAU 38. 6 74. 3 129. 6 189. 1 294. 7 10. 7% 0 - 2. 6 - 6. 6 - 14. 2 - 22. 1 - 0. 4% Reduction
APS Scenarios for RE Development Results of Energy Outlook-APS vs. BAU GHG Reduction Potential in Power Generation
Key Findings * Energy demand in Viet Nam is expected to continue to grow at a significant rate. RE sources potential could contribute significantly to meeting higher demand in a sustainable manner. * Electricity demand is increasing with highest annual growth rate of 9. 1 percent in BAU and is projected to decline to 9. 0 percent in APS. This decline seems to be modest due to SWH applied in residential sector only. * Coal thermal power plants will be the major power generation in Viet Nam in coming years. This area presents the largest energy conservation as well as the GHG mitigation potential in Viet Nam. * The share of primary RE in total primary commercial energy increases from insignificant share of 0. 8 percent in 2010 to 6. 4 percent in 2020 and 7. 4 percent in 2030, indicating that Viet Nam could be achieve the goal of 5. 0 percent of RE in total primary commercial energy by 2020.
Thank you very much
- Slides: 42