The New Public Realm Planning for Independent Aging
The New Public Realm: Planning for Independent Aging in Northern Metropolitan Regions Jie. Lan Xu Bonnie Bartlett APA Northeast Region Conference June 26, 2015 Ph. D student, University of Toronto Urban and Transportation Planner, Arup
Self-introduction Jie. Lan Xu Ph. D student, University of Toronto -planning tools for 'age-friendly cities/communities' in relation to the spatial and historical context of urban development; -comparative cases studies of aging experiences in different types of built environment with a focus on the relations between neighborhood environment and healthy aging/ active aging. - - Bonnie Bartlett Urban and Transportation Planner -graduated with the University of Toronto, 2012, Master of Science in Planning -employed with Arup (2+ years) -awarded internal funding to examine age-friendly transportation in the Greater Toronto Area
Summary of Session • This session explores how municipalities can support the independence of aging adults by providing age-friendly transportation and housing options. • The responses provide best practices that are applicable to the built form and particular challenges of northern metropolitan regions in North America • Session time: 8: 45 am – 10: 15 am
As de-institutionalization As remaining independent Aging-in-place The ability for people to stay in a familiar environmental setting as they age The ability for people to remain certain competence and control over the surrounding environment As an interaction between people and the environment The ability to adapt to changes in both the aging person and the surrounding environment As remaining a sense of placeattachment and social connection, with choices over environment The ability to stay socially connected, have a sense of security and identity, and have choices over where and how to age in place Aging-in-community As being independent with the help of community services/support The supportive environment in older people's place of living, including mutual support and services or care provided in community
• Community contexts of seniors: inner-city VS. suburb • Naturally occurring retirement communities VS. mixed-age neighborhoods (construction periods & housing stock)
• Community contexts of seniors: inner-city VS. suburb • Naturally occurring retirement communities VS. mixed-age neighborhoods (construction periods & housing stock)
• Community contexts of seniors: inner-city VS. suburb • Naturally occurring retirement communities VS. mixed-age neighborhoods (construction periods & housing stock)
Question 1 What are the key concepts/ issues examined in your research? Could you please describe what drew you to this topic?
Question 2 What are the trends in aging (such as the changes of housing needs and transportation needs) that you’ve found in your research? How these trends will change over the coming decades (any research, evidence or assumption)?
¾ of all 65+ seniors have a driver’s license Drivers aged 70+ are the 2 nd highest accident risk group Canadian seniors are most likely to drive or to be driven, even in Toronto Seniors in Canada are disproportionately represented in pedestrian traffic fatalities
Housing Options for Seniors * this slide shows some general comparisons and there can be great variations in each housing options and among different regions Independent Age-restricted living/retirement Community communities (for independent seniors) Cohousing Specialized (Purposively planned) housing Assisted living communities (Personalized support services & care) Nursing care (skilled care facilities with 24 hour care) Residence with specialized services (Alzheimer’s care) Continuing care (assisted living & nursing care in one location) Non-specialized housing Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities (NORCs), lifelong housing, etc. Private dwelling (aging-in-place in a narrow sense) Housing development (regulated by development controls) Home care (services delivered at home) Adult day care (services in community) Health and social services (often regulated by health authorities) Assistance of daily living Community Services Overall health of residents Health services Community activities Independent environment Affordability in general
Housing and Care for Seniors *data from Canada-wide survey of care-givers “The majority of caregivers of seniors took care of their parents or parents-inlaw, regardless of where the senior lived. This was particularly the case among those who helped a senior in a care facility and in supportive housing (61%). ” Caregivers helping seniors in care facilities and those living with their care recipient were most likely to report stress associated with their caregiving responsibilities- 33% and 29% respectively. 14% 8% 16% 62% They also reported more out-of-pocket caregiving related expenses Private residence separate from caregivers Private residence with care-givers Care facility (nursing home, hospital, etc. ) Reference: Statistic Canada (2015) Senior care: Differences by type of housing. Data Source: Statistics Canada - Social General Survey 2012 Supportive housing % caregivers provide care on a weekly basis
Housing Trends for Seniors (Canada) Population pyramid by living arrangement and sex for the population aged 65 and over, Canada, 2011 Percentage of the population aged 15 and over living in a single-detached house by age group, Canada, 2011 Notes: 1. Refers to married spouses and common-law partners. 2. 'Other' includes seniors who are lone parents, living with other relatives or non-relatives, or adult children living with their parent(s). Sources: Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2011. Retrieved from: http: //www 12. statcan. ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98 -312 -x/2011003/fig 3_4 -1 -eng. cfm
Trends of Senior’s Housing in Ontario (specialized senior housing) ($) (Number of Spaces) Data source: CMHC Seniors’ Housing Survey, multiple years
Question 3 What organizations or cities are leading the charge in designing cities for accommodating aging populations?
Community support and health services Communication and information Civic participation and employment Health AARP Livablility Index WHO Age-friendly Cities Guide Environment Social participation Respect and social inclusion Opportunity Engagement
WHO- Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide Housing ☐ Sufficient, affordable housing is available in areas that are safe and close to services and the rest of the community. ☐ Sufficient and affordable home maintenance and support services are available. ☐ Housing is well-constructed and provides safe and comfortable shelter from the weather. ☐ Interior spaces and level surfaces allow freedom of movement in all rooms and passageways. ☐ Home modification options and supplies are available and affordable, and providers understand the needs of older people. ☐ Public and commercial rental housing is clean, wellmaintained and safe. ☐ Sufficient and affordable housing for frail and disabled older people, with appropriate services, is provided locally. Source: http: //www. who. int/ageing/publications/age_friendly_cities_guide/en/ Transportation ☐ Public transportation costs are consistent, clearly displayed and affordable. ☐ Public transportation is reliable and frequent, including at night and on weekends and holidays. ☐ All city areas and services are accessible by public transport, with good connections and well-marked routes and vehicles. ☐ Vehicles are clean, well-maintained, accessible, not overcrowded and have priority seating that is respected. ☐ Specialized transportation is available for disabled people. ☐ Drivers stop at designated stops and beside the curb to facilitate boarding and wait for passengers to be seated before driving off. ☐ Transport stops and stations are conveniently located, accessible, safe, clean, welllit and well-marked, with adequate seating and shelter. ☐ Complete and accessible information is provided to users about routes, schedules and special needs facilities. ☐ A voluntary transport service is available where public transportation is too limited. ☐ Taxis are accessible and affordable, and drivers are courteous and helpful. ☐ Roads are well-maintained, with covered drains and good lighting. ☐ Traffic flow is well-regulated. ☐ Roadways are free of obstructions that block drivers’ vision. ☐ Traffic signs and intersections are visible and well-placed. ☐ Driver education and refresher courses are promoted for all drivers. ☐ Parking and drop-off areas are safe, sufficient in number and conveniently located. ☐ Priority parking and drop-off spots for people with special needs are available and respected.
Source: https: //livabilityindex. aarp. org/categories/housing
Question 4 Can you give some examples of specific planning tools or policies (urban design/ housing/ transportation) have been or can be implemented to create 'agefriendly' environment?
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act Healthy Aging in Rural and Remote
Cohousing: Case-Cohabitat Québec Source of images: http: //temp. cohabitat. ca/ Canadian Mortgage and Housing Cooperation provided Seed and Proposal Development Funding to help cover some early-stage development costs.
NORCs-SSP: Implementation at different places, scales and neighborhoods 3, 8% Predominantly urban areas 50, 0% 42, 3% Suburban areas 11, 5% Rural areas low income areas 19, 2% Mixed geographic area low to middle income areas 19, 2% middle income areas 46, 2% 7, 7% Within apartment buildings 34, 6% 26, 9% middle to high income areas Within a neighborhood or section of a town or city Within an entire town or multiple towns Within entire county 30, 8% Data Source: An Overview of Programs in the National NORCs Aging in Place Initiative: Results from a 2012 Organizational Survey. Retrieved from: http: //agingandcommunity. com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/National-NORC-FINAL. pdf
NORCs-SSP: Supportive Services Provision and Utilization Top Five Services Most Commonly Provided by STAFF Facilitation of volunteer opportunities for older. . . 69, 20% Transportation 76, 90% Professional coordination of services 92, 30% Central telephone number or email to request. . . 96, 20% Recreational, social, and cultural gatherings 96, 20% Top Five Services Most Commonly Provided by VOLUNTEERS Grocery shopping 38, 50% Facilitation of volunteer opportunities for older. . . 38, 50% Transportation In most surveyed programs, transportation and home health services were requested most frequently over the year of survey. 46, 20% Recreational, social, and cultural gatherings 50, 00% Friendly visitors 50, 00% Top Five Services Most Commonly Provided by REFERRAL Data Source: An Overview of Programs in the National NORCs Aging in Place Initiative: Results from a 2012 Organizational Survey. Retrieved from: http: //agingandcommunity. com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/12/National-NORC-FINAL. pdf Legal services House cleaning Transportation Home-delivered meals Home health 73, 10% 76, 90% 84, 60% 92, 30%
Question 5 What are three key challenges for city planners uncovered in your research thus far?
“Transit use is generational and driving can be part of a generation’s culture. It would be intimidating to start riding transit as an older adult if you’ve never ridden before. ‘When do I go, where does the bus go? ’” - Steve Mac. Rae, City of Mississauga "I am a senior and am new to Burlington so do not know the streets or routes. When I am on the bus there are no announcements for stops. This makes me very nervous that I will miss my stop, and makes me hesitant to venture out on my own. ” - Burlington resident feedback
Question 6 What are three key recommendations for city planners uncovered in your research thus far?
Question 7 What special challenges the northeast region face?
1/3 of 65+ Canadians and Americans fall every year $34 billion in direct costs in US (2012)
Question 8 If you could enforce one aspect of age-friendly design for all cities, what would it be? Why?
Questions?
Sources Information • http: //www. phac-aspc. gc. ca/seniors-aines/publications/public/injury-blessure/safelive-securite/chap 2 -eng. php • http: //www. cdc. gov/Homeand. Recreational. Safety/Falls/adultfalls. html • http: //www. who. int/ageing/publications/age_friendly_cities_guide/en/ • http: //www. seniorhousingnet. com • https: //livabilityindex. aarp. org/ • http: //www. cohousing. org/ • http: //www. nyc. gov/html/dfta/downloads/pdf/dfta_aps_0914. pdf • http: //www. fin. gov. on. ca/en/economy/demographics/projections/ Photos • http: //www. urbanindy. com/2014/02/10/wthrs-report-on-sidewalk-snow-clearance/ • http: //countryhosts. com/ • http: //temp. cohabitat. ca/ • Vinoth Chandar https: //flic. kr/p/d. ZRj. FE • https: //www. flickr. com/photos/johnath/6876795286/in/photolist-dk. Jy. Jo-Kx 33 L-bt. Fn. DY-b. F 7 TSB-9 z. Dh. KF-a 1 t. TAu-oncw. Q-7 d. Ej. M
- Slides: 37