THE MOBILITY SCOREBOARD FOR INITIAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND

  • Slides: 28
Download presentation
THE MOBILITY SCOREBOARD FOR INITIAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING OPENING PLATFORM THESSALONIKI, 3 RD

THE MOBILITY SCOREBOARD FOR INITIAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING OPENING PLATFORM THESSALONIKI, 3 RD JUNE 2016

Content Background Objectives Tools First findings Next steps 2 The MSB for IVET -

Content Background Objectives Tools First findings Next steps 2 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

d n u o r g k c Ba

d n u o r g k c Ba

2011 – Council Recommendation § 10 key areas for action § A scoreboard to

2011 – Council Recommendation § 10 key areas for action § A scoreboard to monitor progress 2015 – Start of work on IVET-MSB Working Partners Refer. Net – Expert Group – Eurydice – Commission 4 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

The ten key thematic areas for action § § § Information and guidance Removing

The ten key thematic areas for action § § § Information and guidance Removing obstacles Recognition Partnerships and funding Motivation 5 § § § Preparation Quality Portability Disadvantaged learners Multipliers The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

6 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

6 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

s e v i t c e j b O

s e v i t c e j b O

Assisting the making of mobility policies § § 8 Tacking stock of state-of-play Locating

Assisting the making of mobility policies § § 8 Tacking stock of state-of-play Locating areas of concern Providing a database of good practices Formulating policy suggestions The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

At users’ level • Organisers arrange activities • Learners go on mobility Experience leads

At users’ level • Organisers arrange activities • Learners go on mobility Experience leads to 9 Surveying good practices • Looking for solutions • Identifying needs The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016 • Designing suggestions for reforms Input for reform

At national policymakers’ level Design reforms Look for improvement Monitor / check mobility system

At national policymakers’ level Design reforms Look for improvement Monitor / check mobility system 10 Receive users’ views Survey good practices in Europe Check country’s position on European scene The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

At EU policy-makers’ level Towards 2020 Designing new policies for progress Identifying priorities for

At EU policy-makers’ level Towards 2020 Designing new policies for progress Identifying priorities for action Taking stock of stateof-play in Europe

Tools

Tools

Maps § Categorical design e. g. Provision of information & guidance, 2015 § Taking

Maps § Categorical design e. g. Provision of information & guidance, 2015 § Taking an overview of situation in Europe and locating areas of concern § 40 maps in the final version § Online functionalities: — Select countries — Select year 13 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

Indicators § Constructed based on criteria drawn from Recommendation § Taking an overview of

Indicators § Constructed based on criteria drawn from Recommendation § Taking an overview of situation in Europe by thematic area, assessing the distance of countries to the Recommendation § In the final version: — 10 “thematic” indicators, i. e. one by mobility area (C 1 - C 10) — 4 “transversal” indicators, catching overall performance in • Setting up targets for mobility policies (C 11) • Coordinating mobility policies (C 12) • Evaluating mobility policies (C 13) • Having an overall strategy in mobility policies (C 14) 14 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

Reference structure of thematic indicators Crit. 1. Target setting process 5 A process in

Reference structure of thematic indicators Crit. 1. Target setting process 5 A process in place 4 3 2 No process, but plans Criterion 2. Crit. 3. Actions have coordinated been taken countrywide Actions in all Complete relevant coordination dimensions Actions in part Incomplete of the relevant coordination but dimensions completion plans Actions in one of Incomplete the relevant coordination, no dimensions completion plans No actions, but No coordination plans but plans No actions, no 1 No process, no plans 15 Criterion 4. Actions Criterion 5. Learners are subject to and stakeholders evaluation are involved All relevant Actions are involvement evaluated measures taken Actions are Part of relevant monitored, full evaluation planned measures taken Monitoring but no plans for evaluation No monitoring but plans One type of relevant measures taken No measures but plans No coordination, No monitoring and No measures, no no plans The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

Concept of transversal indicators § Overall performance in setting up targets for mobility policies:

Concept of transversal indicators § Overall performance in setting up targets for mobility policies: C 11 = Average of all ten criteria 1 (C 1. 1, C 2. 1, …, C 10. 1) § Overall performance in coordinating mobility policies: C 12 = Average of all ten criteria 3 (C 1. 3, C 2. 3, …, C 10. 3) § Overall performance in evaluating mobility policies: C 13 = Average of all ten criteria 4 (C 1. 4, C 2. 4, …, C 10. 4) § Performance in having an overall strategy in mobility policies: C 14 = Average of the three abovementioned transversal indicators (C 11, C 12, C 13) 16 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

Country categorisation by level of performance (e. g. Indicator 4 – Partnerships & funding,

Country categorisation by level of performance (e. g. Indicator 4 – Partnerships & funding, 2015) Countries per category Degree of closeness / distance to full implementation of Recommendation 17 Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom Austria, Belgium-FR, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain Belgium-All, Belgium-DE, Belgium-NL, France, Ireland, Portugal Iceland Greece The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016 Average EU + IS + NO

Overview tables: areas of concern in Europe 18 The MSB for IVET - Opening

Overview tables: areas of concern in Europe 18 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

Scorecards: from European to country focus § Based on indicator scores § Summary of

Scorecards: from European to country focus § Based on indicator scores § Summary of areas of — Success / good practices — Concern / priority action § 34 scorecards, i. e. — 1 by country (Belgium 3) — Average EU + IS + NO 19 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

Country fiches: good practices & policy suggestions COUNTRY Information and guidance 1. Detailed description

Country fiches: good practices & policy suggestions COUNTRY Information and guidance 1. Detailed description of country structures and policy actions 2. Analysis of country situation against the requirements of Recommendation Administrative and institutional issues 1. Detailed description of country structures and policy actions 2. Analysis of country situation against the requirements of Recommendation Recognition of learning outcomes ⋮ Synthesis Suggestions for country to better meet the requirements of Recommendation 20 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

s g n i d n i f First

s g n i d n i f First

An area of success: Partnerships and funding § Overall performance of 28 participating countries:

An area of success: Partnerships and funding § Overall performance of 28 participating countries: § Strong points —Mobility cross-European partnerships and networks between IVET institutions & companies are supported – 24 countries —Mobility trips of learners are funded – 27 countries —Organisers receive support – 26 countries —Part of actions at least are at least monitored – 27 countries § Next steps for further progress —Moving from monitoring to evaluation (full in DE & SE only) —Assist catch-up efforts in the few countries lagging behind 22 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

An area with room for progress: Recognition § Overall performance of 28 participating countries:

An area with room for progress: Recognition § Overall performance of 28 participating countries: § Points for improvement —Scope of recognition is often too narrow: • 16 countries do not recognise more than 3 types of learning components / outcomes (only 8 recognise 6 types) —Time frame for processing recognition or recognition requests is lacking or long (12 weeks+) in 19 countries • Automatic recognition (DE, NO); 6 weeks in NL, PT —Actions to let learners know about where to get information on recognition are lacking in 18 countries • EE: visit events & institutions, contact counsellors 23 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

A few comments § Success in Partnerships and funding might be linked to EU

A few comments § Success in Partnerships and funding might be linked to EU programmes (Leonardo, Erasmus+) In many countries: — The EU programme is the single mobility scheme — Support to partnerships and organisers, and funding of learners’ mobility, are ensured within the National Agency § Not all priority reforms require more funding e. g. in Recognition: extending the scope; time framing the process; and making visible the contact points for information 24 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

s p e t s t x e N

s p e t s t x e N

Next steps § June to November: finalisation taking on board — Results of usability

Next steps § June to November: finalisation taking on board — Results of usability test and feedback from this meeting — Other feedback from users and stakeholders § 5 -9 December: official launch during the VET week § 23 December: 1 st online Scoreboard available, covering — 28 EU Member States + IS + NO — 7 thematic areas + corresponding maps — 7 thematic indicators + 4 provisional transversal indicators — 3 Overview tables, 34 scorecards, 32 country fiches § August 2017: full version (all thematic areas and all indicators) 26 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

The usability test: first figures § 21 respondents so far (test will be open

The usability test: first figures § 21 respondents so far (test will be open until end September) Easiness of… Maps Indicators Overview tables Scorecards Fiches Filtering options 19 18 18 19 14 Reading data 17 14 16 12 12 Understanding visualisation 16 17 16 13 12 Graphical design 13 15 12 14 11 § Main comments to be addressed — A site for experts (more explanations, pop up windows…) — Some functionalities are missing (export, print…) — “More” buttons for readers wishing to know more 27 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016

Thank you 28 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June

Thank you 28 The MSB for IVET - Opening Platform, Thessaloniki, 3 rd June 2016