The MAORY Laser Guide Star Wavefront Sensor Design

  • Slides: 35
Download presentation
The MAORY Laser Guide Star Wavefront Sensor: Design status Laura Schreiber – INAF OABO

The MAORY Laser Guide Star Wavefront Sensor: Design status Laura Schreiber – INAF OABO On behalf of: P. Feautrier, E. Stadler, P. Rabou, J. J. Correia, Z. Hubert, L. Gluck, L. Jocou, S. Rochat, Y. Magnard, T. Moulin, A. Delboulbé, S. Douté, G. Chauvin, E. Moreau, S. Oberti, C. Verinaud & the MAORY consortium

MAORY • E-ELT Multi Adaptive Optics Relay • First light instrument • Client instrument:

MAORY • E-ELT Multi Adaptive Optics Relay • First light instrument • Client instrument: MICADO, near infrared camera and spectrograph (0. 8 -2. 5 µm, 50 x 50”) • Consortium made by INAF (IT), IPAG (FR) and ESO • IPAG responsible for LGS WFS sub-system

MAORY overview • Wave front sensing based on • • • NGS patrol field

MAORY overview • Wave front sensing based on • • • NGS patrol field of view (“technical Fo. V”) 6 fast Sodium LGS WFS for high order modes measurements; 3 IR fast NGS WFS for low order modes measurements; 3 Visible slow NGS WFS for truth sensing (up to mode 50 -100). • Wave front Correction operated by • • MICADO focal plane 50”x 50” M 4/M 5 (Telescope); Post focal deformable mirrors (possible upgrade to two DMs) 6 Laser Guide Stars 90 arcsec 3 Natural Guide Stars 180 arcsec 3

E-ELT GP LCS LT LCS MS LCS M 1 LCS M 2 LCS M

E-ELT GP LCS LT LCS MS LCS M 1 LCS M 2 LCS M 3 LCS science 0. 6 – 1, 0 µm M 4 LCS 4800 commands @ 100 -1000 Hz 1. 5 – 1. 8 µm E-ELT CCS 2 commands @ TBD Hz 0. 589 µm M 5 LCS 4800 WF @ 100 -1000 Hz / 4800 + 2 commands @ 100 -1000 Hz INS-DM 1 700 commands @ 100 -1000 Hz INS-RTC WFS-NGS-Ref WFS-NGS-LO 6 x Det. LGS size @ 100 -700 (1000) Hz 700 commands @ 100 -1000 Hz HO WFS Unit 6 X Dichroic b/s (INS-DM 2) WFS-LGS Offsetting LT commands Active Optics commands ICS 3 x Det. Ref size@ 0. 1 -100 Hz (TBC) 3 x Det. Ref size @ 100 -1000 Hz MICADO focal plane 50”x 50” 4

MAORY overview Pre-Focal Station LOR/SCAO and MICADO Second Ins Port LGS WFS

MAORY overview Pre-Focal Station LOR/SCAO and MICADO Second Ins Port LGS WFS

LGS WFS Overview • Responsibility of IPAG (Grenoble) • Six Laser Guide Stars for

LGS WFS Overview • Responsibility of IPAG (Grenoble) • Six Laser Guide Stars for High Order Correction (hexagon 45” radius) • Shack Hartman LGSWFS 80 x 80 sub-apertures • Gravity invariant (i. e. vertical/downwards position) • LGS centroid altitude range, 84 km ÷ 240 km • Fixed respect to the telescope pupil counter rotation with telescope elevation • Operational frame rate, 100 ÷ 700 fps Pfrommer 2014 • Internal Calibration Unit for NCPA

Folding mirror LGS WFS I/F • LGS WFS position • On the MAORY bench

Folding mirror LGS WFS I/F • LGS WFS position • On the MAORY bench • Optical interface • LGS Objective: • • Focal ratio: F/5 Exit pupil: at infinity • Mechanical Interface • Focus rails screwed to the MAORY bench • Total weight on MAORY bench • ≈ 500 kg (≈ 300 kg moving mass) 7

The LGSWFS module position change 8

The LGSWFS module position change 8

The LGSWFS module position change DM 2 dichroic DM 1 LGS objective 9

The LGSWFS module position change DM 2 dichroic DM 1 LGS objective 9

The LGSWFS module position change The drivers are installation, accessibility and maintainability • Significant

The LGSWFS module position change The drivers are installation, accessibility and maintainability • Significant Sub-system mass reduction (almost the half) • Global focus correction and control simplification (actuation forces required easier to obtain with smaller motors. Heat dissipation reduced) • Reduction of cantilever effect (no more on the corner) • Main bench mass reduction (due to mass reduction and change of position) 10

The LGSWFS hottest requirement: the sub-aperture Fo. V • Laser guide stars look elongated

The LGSWFS hottest requirement: the sub-aperture Fo. V • Laser guide stars look elongated from the SH apertures far from the laser launcher • 10 km Sodium thickness (FWHM) 10 arcsec elongation in the edge sub-aperture • The available cameras (ESO LISA) mount a CMOS 800 X 800 pixels (10 px per sub-aperture) • Spot wings could be cut in edge sub-apertures spot truncation or sub -sampling? Fo. V choice = Resolution choice Trade-off 11

Aberrations due to Sodium profile sodium layer dh = 10 km • • Infinite

Aberrations due to Sodium profile sodium layer dh = 10 km • • Infinite WFS field of view Sodium layer features produce focus term (+ tip-tilt with edge projection) Finite WFS field of view other orders are excited Sodium layer changes in time aberrations also change Atmosphere Telescope Pupil Wavefront Sensor Slope • H=90 km Distance from LGS launch position

Sodium profile variability Picture taken from: T. Pfrommer and P. Hickson, 2010, J. Opt.

Sodium profile variability Picture taken from: T. Pfrommer and P. Hickson, 2010, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Vol. 27 No. 11

LGSWFS Fo. V trade-off (C. Verinaud) • Three Fo. V / sampling have been

LGSWFS Fo. V trade-off (C. Verinaud) • Three Fo. V / sampling have been studied • FOV=10 arcsec, Sampling=1 arcsec/pix • FOV=15 arcsec, Sampling=1. 5 arcsec/pix • FOV=20 arcsec, Sampling=2. 0 arcsec/pix • When needed, spot defocused in order to have 1 px FWHM • To manage non linearities Solid: Fo. V 10 arcsec Dashed: Fo. V 15 arcsec Dot-Dashed: Fo. V 20 arcsec. RON=3 e. TCo. G with T = 3*ron REFSLOPES pre-computed using Na profile No jitter in this case FRIM Reconstructor (elongation information for noise priors) 14

LGSWFS Fo. V trade-off (C. Verinaud) Spurious low order single channel analysis: • Considering

LGSWFS Fo. V trade-off (C. Verinaud) Spurious low order single channel analysis: • Considering different Na profiles, simulated the LGS spots in 4 different cases • • • No truncation 20 arcsec truncated like case 15 arcsec truncated like case 10 arcsec truncated like case Centroid computation with classical Co. G Project Centroids on Zernikes (100 modes) with SCAO-like reconstructor Location, date 15

LGSWFS Fo. V trade-off (C. Verinaud) 16

LGSWFS Fo. V trade-off (C. Verinaud) 16

LGSWFS Fo. V trade-off preliminary conclusion • No Show-Stopper for SH-based WFS for MAORY

LGSWFS Fo. V trade-off preliminary conclusion • No Show-Stopper for SH-based WFS for MAORY • Enough margin in terms of photons: • • • But Importance of proper priors implementation in Reconstructor Spot enlargement needed to linearize the slopes No need of Na profile • Strong dependence of Bias amplitudes due to truncation with field • Sodium profile variation not considered in this analysis • The spurious low order aberrations could be monitored by the Reference WFS LGSWFS Fo. V requirement is now 20” Starting opto-mechanical study 17

Main functionalities Required • • Probes positioning not required (fixed constellation) Pupil derotation with

Main functionalities Required • • Probes positioning not required (fixed constellation) Pupil derotation with telescope elevation (up to 70° TBC) LGS Jitter correction ELT LGS facility Focus compensation (84 km ÷ 240 km ) • Global Focus • Internal Focus (TBC) • Pupil alignment • After each Telescope pointing and after each Telescope Low Order loop correction (5 minutes) • Internal calibration Unit with x and y positioning stages

LGS WFS Defocus correction timings • A full budget shift is 0. 1’’ (TBC)

LGS WFS Defocus correction timings • A full budget shift is 0. 1’’ (TBC) for all dynamic error sources to stay close to the sensor reference point. This corresponds to a WFE of 637 nm rms (442 μm) Defocus should be the major component. • Two components: • • Predictable f(telescope elevation) Stochastic (sodium profile variation) LGS Altitude Change/Edge Sub. Pupil Shift 0. 1” (m) 83. 9 84. 2 85. 2 89. 3 96. 9 119 168 245 (*) Max Zenith Angle Velocity : 13. 64’’/s (**) Computed from Na altitude PSD 19

H = 90 km Differential focus due to: • Asterism geometry + telescope elevation

H = 90 km Differential focus due to: • Asterism geometry + telescope elevation • Focal plane tilt • (Sodium layer horizontal variation) • Internal effects (thermal, . . ) The differential focus could be eliminated (TBC) 20

Focus correction strategy • Global focus : common to all the probes translation stage/hexapods

Focus correction strategy • Global focus : common to all the probes translation stage/hexapods • Internal focus : individual for each LGS channel hexapods Correction strategies: 1. Common and differential focus correction with dedicated actuators; 2. Focus correction with internal actuators with periodical offloads. Strategy Global Focus Internal Focus Comment 1 7 s 0, 38 min Mainly translation stage 2 3. 03 min (only offloads) 7 s Mainly hexapods 3 Continuous movement 0, 38 min Mainly translation stage • Choice based on: MTBF, actuators precisions, cooling power consumption, electrical power consumption. 21

Focus correction strategy • Global focus : common to all the probes translation stage

Focus correction strategy • Global focus : common to all the probes translation stage • Internal focus : individual for each LGS channel hexapods Correction strategies: 1. Common and differential focus correction with dedicated actuators; 2. Focus correction with internal actuators with periodical offloads. Strategy Global Focus Internal Focus Comment 1 7 s 0, 38 min Mainly translation stage 2 3. 03 min (only offloads) 7 s Mainly hexapods 3 Continuous movement 0, 38 min Mainly translation stage • Choice based on: MTBF, actuators precisions, cooling power consumption, electrical power consumption. 22

Main functionalities offered in the actual design • LGS Probes positioning in XY •

Main functionalities offered in the actual design • LGS Probes positioning in XY • Probes alignment • Maintenance • Field scanning for AIV • Pupil derotation with telescope elevation (up to 60°) • Focus compensation (84 km ÷ 240 km) • Global Focus • Internal Focus (only for alignment) • Pupil alignment • Every 5 – 10 minutes (MTBF OK) • Probes alignment (remotly) • All the degrees of freedom given by the hexapods • Internal calibration (reference slopes) 23

Main functionalities offered in the actual design • LGS Probes positioning in XY •

Main functionalities offered in the actual design • LGS Probes positioning in XY • Probes alignment • Maintenance • Field scanning for AIV Hexapods Rotation Stage Translation stage Calibration unit • Pupil derotation with telescope elevation (up to 60°) • Focus compensation (84 km ÷ 240 ) • Global Focus • Internal Focus (only for alignment) • Pupil alignment • Every 5 – 10 minutes (MTBF OK) • Probes alignment (remotly) • All the degrees of freedom given by the hexapods • Internal calibration (reference slopes) 24

Optical design I/F with LISA camera TBD Studying 20’’ Fo. V Option De-focalized detector

Optical design I/F with LISA camera TBD Studying 20’’ Fo. V Option De-focalized detector option Folding mirror Optical relay 160 mm Pick-off mirror 25

Current design LISA Camera Volume Hexapods are used for X and Y adjustments, for

Current design LISA Camera Volume Hexapods are used for X and Y adjustments, for differential focus corrections, pupil alignment and AIV Hexapod 26

Single probe 27

Single probe 27

28

28

Fixing plate 29

Fixing plate 29

835 mm ∅ 700 mm Rotating stage 30

835 mm ∅ 700 mm Rotating stage 30

Motor for common focus. Translation rails for common focus. 31

Motor for common focus. Translation rails for common focus. 31

Folding mirror Calibration unit 32

Folding mirror Calibration unit 32

Folding mirror 33

Folding mirror 33

Conclusions • • LGSWFS Fo. V: 20 arcseconds LGSWFS sampling: 1 pixel per FWHM

Conclusions • • LGSWFS Fo. V: 20 arcseconds LGSWFS sampling: 1 pixel per FWHM spot defocalization Need for Internal focus correction TBC Simplified designs are under study Location, date 34

Location, date 35

Location, date 35