The Lockheed Martin Digital Tapestry 2012 INCOSE MBSE

Agenda • Past Experiences with Model-based Engineering at Lockheed Martin: Lessons Learned and Success Stories (5 min) • Realizing The Potential of Model-based Engineering: Developing a Model-centric Digital Tapestry (20 min) • Q&A/Open Discussion (10 min) Please Interrupt if You Have Questions! © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation 2

Multidisciplinary MBSD Environment DOORS Rhapsody Sys. ML Matlab, C++ U(s) ò G (s) System Verif. Models (Quality Center) Rhapsody Sys. ML Legend Systems Software Hardware Shared SEER-SEM System. C, Verilog, Pro. Engineer, ANSYS S R SET CLR Q Rhapsody UML Q MBSD Toolset Spans the Engineering Disciplines to Integrate Requirements Decomposition, Design , Development, and Implementation © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation 4

Enabling our Engineers • Expertise Utilizing Model Based Practices And Integrated Tool Suites Allows More Variables And Trade Permutations To Optimize A Design And Find The Best Value Solution Faster Domain Specific Model Development & Integration Enterprise Modeling Enhanced Trade Space Exploration Technical Approach Validation System Modeling Component Modeling HW Modeling SW Modeling HW Impl. SW Impl. V&V Modeling Support for Customer Decisions Product Integration © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation 5

Adding Value through MBSD Interface Management Technical Budget Management Test & Integration Requirements Mapping Document Generation • Interface baseline maintained through Sys. ML IBDs and Message model elements. • Documents HW & SW interfaces consistently and ties system behaviors to interfaces. • Scripts can be used to auto-generate interface software directly from the model. • Budgets (size, weight, power, performance, cost) easily managed & maintained in the model. • Engineers enter budget values at lowest leaf level in model (allocated and actual). • Custom budget script runs to accurately roll up budgets to higher levels up to the system level • The test context, test cases, and test architecture can be captured in Sys. ML. • Test cases can be electronically linked to requirements with verification relationships. • Test procedures described in Sys. ML activity diagrams. • Requirements Decomposition Consistently Maintained within Architecture Model • As requirements evolve, component Impact assessment is easily evaluated through the model • Requirements Lineage Easily Traced , TPMs easily tagged and identified. • Storing information in a model-based database allows for easy data manipulation and extraction. • Documentation generated from the model is always up-to-date and consistent • Labor spent on Document generation can be shifted to more critical tasks © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation 6

Revisiting Additional Disciplines for Integration DOORS Rhapsody Sys. ML Matlab, C++ U(s) ò G (s) System Verif. Models (Quality Center) Rhapsody Sys. ML Legend Systems Software Hardware Shared SEER-SEM System. C, Verilog, Pro. Engineer, ANSYS S R SET CLR Q Use System Design Rationale LM Standard Rhapsody UML Q Extension of MBSD Integration Concepts into Verification, Costing, Electronics, Mechanical and Manufacturing Disciplines Shows Promise © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation 7

Realizing The Potential of Model-based Engineering Developing a Model-centric Digital Tapestry © Copyright 2011

The New Reality – Affordability and Resilience Systems 2020 Vision Existing Gaps and Critical Needs • Adversary can use commercial technologies and new tactics to rapidly alter the threat to US forces • Gap: Lack of a Conceptual Design Environment • Gap: Lack of tools to integrate system modeling capabilities across domains • Do. D engineering, and business processes not structured for adaptability • Gap: Lack of open, virtual and realistic environment for validation and producibility analysis • Need an integrated (i. e. cross discipline) framework for concept, design and analysis of systems based on standards, open architecture and existing COTS tool sets • New research, tools, pilot efforts needed to determine best methods for building adaptable defense systems • Need faster delivery of adaptable systems that are trusted, assured, reliable and interoperable © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation 9

Existing Modeling Activities • Most engineers leverages focused modeling activities across various disciplines. • Capability to support integration across disciplines tends to be limited or missing. • Existing integrations tend to be “point to point” Architecture Cost CAD Performance © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation Manufacturing 10

From Focused Models to Digital Tapestry The Imperatives • • Cost Technical Credibility Innovation Business Generation Manufacturing Architecture Software CAD Cost Performance Electronics © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation Verification 11

Sys. ML: An Enabler for the Digital Tapestry • A well defined System Architecture Model (SAM) is the loom that weaves the many threads of digital information together. • The SAM helps link requirements to logical and behavioral design. • Requirements can be fed into increasingly detailed levels of domain specific modeling. F=ma • By viewing the SAM as the hub of the digital tapestry, an integration pattern emerges enabling crossdomain connectivity with a minimal set of required integrations. © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation 12

Modeling Across The Product Lifecycle Operations Modeling • Systems Modeling Design Modeling Mechanical Modeling Performance Modeling Electrical Modeling Cost Modeling Software Modeling • Achieving a Model-based Approach to Product Development Requires a Multi-disciplinary Modeling Methodology and Tools Environment Maturity of approach must be achieved in each technical discipline and also across discipline boundaries Engineering Is Responsible To Understand All Items That Could Impact A Design And Determine A Resolution For Those Items Managed Part Tree Single Source BOM Weight budget Systems Modeling UPC budget Test Modeling Design Performance Cost Production Modeling Sustainment Modeling Weight estimates Dimensions Mechanical Modeling © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation UPC estimates Integrated Data Layer • 13

Model Integration Through The Product Lifecycle Technology Development Concept Refinement System CONOPS Model Production & Deployment Engineering & Manufacturing Development System Requirements 3 D CAD Model Operations & Sustainment Producibility Model O&S Hub… TBD Mech. Analysis Model System Test Model Reliabilty Model System Architecture Model System Cost Model Lifecycle Cost Model Bill of Materials Software Model Firmware / Elect. Model System Analysis Model Integration of Major Hubs Achieved through Integrated Data Management Layer 14

y Expand, Accelerate and Validate Trades ilit tib pa m Co e/ us Re ilit s tem s y S y üModel Based s Co st tem sys üStandards Based Sub Per f orm an C it bil ple xity s ent on p om ce Com s ab de Us on a Tr ati tem s y S of ms te Sys of egr ls ve Int Le Mission Interactions Calls for and Integrated Digital Analysis Thread for Performance, Cost, Usability and Compatibility Accelerates Trade Analysis VS a Us üIntegrated / Compatible Tools üTechnical Progress Validation y üMission Performance and Force Compatibility Customer Business Climate Demands More Levels and Complexity of Trades to build Compatible Affordable Useable Solutions © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation üCustomer Inclusion 15

Low Hanging Fruit: Integrated Multidisciplinary Analysis Requirements Cost Analysis Detailed Performance Analysis Design Artifacts & Methodology Design & Architecture Performance / Cost Analysis Systems Analysis Design Optimization Best Value Determination Analysis Traceability Mission Performance © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation 16

Partnering with Tool Vendors Phoenix Integration: Sys. ML to Analysis Integration © Copyright 2011

Enhanced Tooling Beginning to Enable Integrated Model-based Analysis • Lockheed Martin has worked with Phoenix Integration to begin defining an integration between Sys. ML and Model Center™ • Focused on rapid integration and trades and allowing engineers to use the right tool for each job. © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation / Phoenix Integration 18

Questions? © Copyright 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation 19

20