The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop The Italian intercity market model Paolo Beria, Raffaele Grimaldi, Antonio Laurino Dipartimento di Architettura e Pianificazione Politecnico di Milano Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori 1 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop CONTENTS Long distance coach transport in Italy Carachteristics of LD coach transport Ideas for a future of the industry Conclusions 2 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Long distance coach transport in Italy An unknown sector Long distance coach services are almost unknown in Italy, despite its quantitative importance: § users usually only know the line they use; § non users often ignore the existence of a significant alternative network to rail services ; § public opinion ignores the sector; § public policies tend to concentrate only on rail. No specific policies for coach. The industry in Italy is already mature and developed, even if liberalisation is expected to change and further develop it a lot. This study, commissioned by ANAV and recently presented, tries to shed a light on the sector 3 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Long distance coach transport in Italy Regulation Local public transport (incl. 2 -regions services) Interregional services (more than 2 regions) Charter services “Interregional road services of State competence” “Passenger services supplied by coaches on road, with undifferentiated supply, operated continuously or periodically on paths linking more than two regions” D. Lgs. 285/2005 The sector was liberalised since 2007, moving from exclusive concessions to non-exclusive authorisations. Up to 31 December 2013 firms can keep existing concessions. A monitoring activity is foreseen to control liberalisation effects and avoid possible disruptive competition. 4 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Long distance coach transport in Italy Integration or competition Historical framework of long distance public transport in European countries. Modal competition Hierarchic / planned Air Bus and coaches Air Rail Bus and coaches Strong core rail network + feeding buses Competition among modes allowed (e. g. UK, Sweden, Italy future. . . ) (e. g. France, Germany, Switzerland) Bus and coaches Competition, but with areas of protection of rail Air Rail (e. g. Italy past) 5 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Long distance coach transport in Italy ANAV coach companies Bus-km 2010 Method: 2010 supply estimation: > 90 millions bus×km/year Reconstruction of all 2011 services from timetables Survey of 2010 data on supply (incopmplete) More than 19 millions bus-km Sample: - ANAV companies which gave data for 2010; - Only State competence services (no services among two regions). (estimated) 72, 8 milions bus-km (sccounted) * TRASPOL simulation on 2011 timetable 6 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Long distance coach transport in Italy National services in Italy Assuming an average load factor of 30 passengers per vehicle, we estimate about 3. 000 millions passengers-km. Passengers 2010 National coaches (own approximate estimate) ~ 3, 000 mln. pax-km Trenitalia medium-long distance: (Balance Sheet 2010) - Market services - Subsidised “Universal Service” - “Non subsidised/non market” services 11, 476 mln. pax-km +2. 9% since 2009 7, 012 mln. pax-km -18. 2% since 2009 2, 149 mln. pax-km -10. 3% since 2009 Total Trenitalia medium-long distance 20, 637 mln. pax-km -6. 7% since 2009 Universal Service (Servizio Universale) is the name for subsidised long distance trains in Italy (see later). Subsides are directly awarded to Trenitalia (no public tenderings). “Non subsidised/non market” are services that Trenitalia claims to be operating without subsides though loosing money. These have been kept (up to now) for political reasons. 7 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Long distance coach transport in Italy National services in Italy Graphical representation of weekly services, per region/geographical area. 1. Significant North-South services 2. Maximum number of services between Rome and the South 3. Important internal relations in the Centre and in the South 4. Limited services in the North. (note: obviously, frequencies can’t be summed up, because of different paths) 8 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Long distance coach transport in Italy National services in Italy Graphical representation of weekly services, per region/geographical area. 1. Significant North-South services 2. Maximum number of services between Rome and the South 3. Important internal relations in the Centre and in the South 4. Limited services in the North. (note: obviously, frequencies can’t be summed up, because of different paths) 9 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Long distance coach transport in Italy National services in Italy National coaches in Italy nowadays serve mainly: 1. Long distance services, in partial competition with rail and air transport 2. Medium distance services, where rail service is poor, uncomfortable (needs interchange, etc. ), too expensive (HSR) or not existing at all 3. Tourist services (usually seasonal) 10 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Weekly frequency, per direction Long distance coach transport in Italy I servizi nazionali Line with restrictions (no in/out in some stops) Line without restrictions Long distance coaches cover the whole distance range (100 -1630 km) Line 11 lenght [km] Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Long distance coach transport in Italy International services 12 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop CONTENTS Long distance coach transport in Italy Carachteristics of LD coach transport Ideas for a future of the industry Conclusions 13 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Characteristics of LD coach transport in Italy Main characteristics and comparison with other modes Strenghts § Extensive geographical coverage, even in very low density and dispersed areas § High flexibility and ability to fit changes in demand § Low costs and, as a consequence, low fares, without any public subsidy: the industry does not cost anything to the State § Commercial viability for direct services where impossible for rail because of low density of demand § Higher perceived personal security for passengers, especially on night services Weaknesses § Poor visibility, still developing and fragmented marketing policies § Low commercial speed, although good in terms of door-to-door for many relations. In congested contexts possible uncertainties on travel times § Difficulty of movement on board requires stops on longest trips (further reducing commercial speed) 14 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Characteristics of LD coach transport in Italy Main characteristics and comparison with other modes Example of geographical coverage in Puglia region (southern Italy) of services from northern Italy: Marino network (not the only coach company!) vs. Trenitalia network 15 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Characteristics of LD coach transport in Italy Terminals The attitude of local administrations towards terminals is differenciated in Italy: hostility integration (terminals outside city centres, claiming to reduce congestion) (terminals as a part of multimodal interchange stations) expulsion Marginality Problems for remaining users Progressive loss of users coachway interchanges Lower accessibilty and need for effective linking infrastructures Marginality and lower visibility Higher commercial speeds city terminals Long diversion times Higher visibility Possibly difficult integration with the city structure Easier integration in the city Good practices: Bologna, Roma Tiburtina Ti. Bus (though claims for inadequate capacity), Catania. Partially good: Milano (good design, but distant from city centre). 16 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop CONTENTS Long distance coach transport in Italy Carachteristics of LD coach transport Ideas for a future of the industry Conclusions 17 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Ideas for the future of the industry New markets or consolidation of existing industry? Three perspectives for Italian market: 1. Consolidation of existing market, inside the new liberalised context more efficiency quality 2. Market expansion towards new users (generated or diverted from rail thanks to low fares) new (and new kind of) services marketing and communication 3. Integration/substitution of rail in the “universal service” (subsidised long distance trains) political choice! 18 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Ideas for the future of the industry Trenitalia “rail universal service” 2011 National coaches Just changed & reduced… (Dec 2011) 2011 Trenitalia “universal service” Supply: 90 Mbus-km Supply: 27 Mtrains-km (further reduction in 2012) Public subsides: 0 € Public subsides: 250 M€/y 19 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Ideas for the future of the industry IIl servizio nazionali universale Trenitalia Rail services (subsidised “universal service”) are almost perfectly superposed to national coaches: similar average frequencies, same distance range! 20 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Ideas for the future of the industry Il servizio universale Trenitalia Air transport reference market: long distances, at least daily frequencies LD rail transport reference market: <800 km services, high frequencies Market “in competition” with rail “universal service” Coaches “exclusive” market 21 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Ideas for the future of the industry Il servizio universale Trenitalia Air transport reference market: long distances, at least daily frequencies LD rail transport reference market: <800 km services, high frequencies Field of potential (partial) substitution with rail “universal service” 22 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Ideas for the future of the industry Trenitalia “universal service” – costs estimate U nit average cost Coach company 1 Coach company 2 Coach company 3 Coach company 4 Coach company 5 Coach company 6 Coach company 7 Coach company 8 Coach company 9 Coach company 10 Coach company 11 Coach company 12 Trenitalia Eurostar (servizio universale) Trenitalia Conventional LD train (servizio universale) 1. 40 1. 97 1. 07 0. 96 1. 17 1. 34 1. 82 1. 28 1. 35 1. 36 1. 10 1. 80 €/bus -km €/bus -km €/bus -km Data Data Data 25. 00 €/train-km Estimate 20. 00 €/train-km Estimate LD coach: 2. 7 €cent/seat-km (50 seats/coach) LD train: 4 €cent/seat-km (500 seats/train) 23 Data received from 12 firms (27 million km) suggest average unit costs of 1. 34 €/bus-km (min 0. 96 max 1, 97) Most likely higher than market service costs because of less economies of density (scale? ) Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Ideas for the future of the industry A new “universal service” A typical night train of the “universal service” in Italy nowadays often serve both as: - Inter. City service on short/medium distance during the evening and the morning among places internal to northern and southern Italy; - long distance night service among northern and southern Italy. In some cases, the reorganisation of existing services, separating functions, might allow for significant cost savings and, in some cases, for a better service, using different transport mode. Although no disaggregated public data on patronage of those (subsidised) services are available, possible multi-modal reorganisations with combined rail, air and coach transport might require less subsides. 24 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Ideas for the future of the industry A new “universal service” - example Present situation: 4 daily night trains from Torino, Milano, Bolzano and Trieste to Foggia, Bari e Lecce Nothing is known about demand Estimated Trenitalia cost: approx 62 M€/year 25 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Ideas for the future of the industry A new “universal service” - example (one) Possible rationalisation: § 4 Inter. City trains, Torino + Bolzano + Trieste + Milano Rimini for commuters § 3 regional trains Foggia/Bari Lecce for commuters § 10 night bus lines to connect all O/D with no more than 1 interchange (example: Venezia - Padova - Terme Euganee Monselice - Rovigo - Ferrara - Ravenna - Rimini (HUB) - Foggia - Barletta - Bari) Note: bus lines on the map are not representative of the 10 simulated paths More complex, but sufficient to serve all relations. Estimated cost: 35 M€/year instead of 62 M€/year with rail. Room for possible additional services during peak days (also with train) 26 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop CONTENTS Long distance coach transport in Italy Carachteristics of LD coach transport Ideas for a future of the industry Conclusions 27 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Conclusions Inside the industry and towards the outside Coach transport will face significant changes in regulation inside and outside the industry. Starting from a deeper knowledge of itself, significant opportunities for change will be at stake: - Evolution inside the industry; - Evolution towards other markets. In order to do so, it needs to adopt adequate technological tools (e. g. yield management) and learn from what happened in other industries, especially air transport, and abroad. 28 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Conclusions Inside coach transport… Ideas: 1. Overcoming focus of firms over their historical catchment areas to better take advantage of the liberalisation: Many small markets a unique (bigger) Italian market 2. As for operating costs: in this sector “medium-small is better”! But for commercial aspects: useful to consolidate on bigger average dimensions (difficult for very small firms to make advanced marketing). Better using consortia, to avoid cost increase typical of bigger firms. 3. Unique internet website, where users can find the whole supply, to be perceived as a unique network as for air transport (even without delegating the commercial functions). 29 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Conclusions … and towards the outside! Opportunity for completely rethink the concept of “universal service” (also because Italy needs to cut public expenses): ensure mobility all over the country, but not necessairly by train! Example (but other outcomes are possible): § Subsidised trains (but even non subsidised!) relations with high demand among major cities; § Coaches long relations with low demand, with polarised and dispersed demand (e. g. north-south) and to improve geographical coverage; § Busses medium-short relations with low demand; § Airplanes social (subsidised) fares on some long relations. 30 Brussels , 29 February 2012

The Italian intercity market model IRU Bus and Coach Workshop Thank you for your attention!!! paolo. beria@polimi. it raffaele. grimaldi@polimi. it 31 Brussels , 29 February 2012