The impact of climate change on children Children

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
The impact of climate change on children Children and climate change conference Princeton, March

The impact of climate change on children Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12 -13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Net Benefits of Mitigation (2 C) 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) 2

Net Benefits of Mitigation (2 C) 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) 2

Discounted Utilitarianism (DU) and the Social Discount Rate (SDR) SWF SDR � “Positive”: r

Discounted Utilitarianism (DU) and the Social Discount Rate (SDR) SWF SDR � “Positive”: r 13/03/2015 “Normative”: d Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) 3

Discounted Utilitarianism (DU) and the SDR with uncertainty SWF SDR Declining SDR with persistence

Discounted Utilitarianism (DU) and the SDR with uncertainty SWF SDR Declining SDR with persistence 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) Lower SDR 4

Resource Scarcity and Dual Discounting E. g. Sterner and Persson (2008) SWF SDR Scarcer

Resource Scarcity and Dual Discounting E. g. Sterner and Persson (2008) SWF SDR Scarcer H, substitute C: lower SDR 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) Dual SDRs 5

Extensions and Alternatives to Discounted Utilitarianism 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) 6

Extensions and Alternatives to Discounted Utilitarianism 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) 6

Prioritarian SWF Adler and Treich 2012, 2015 SWF SDR Priority for low well-being 13/03/2015

Prioritarian SWF Adler and Treich 2012, 2015 SWF SDR Priority for low well-being 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) Higher SDR (g>0) 7

Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism Dietz and Asheim (2012) SWF SDR Coincides with DU for sustainable

Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism Dietz and Asheim (2012) SWF SDR Coincides with DU for sustainable paths Zero weight in the present if unsustainable With catastrophic impacts, damages x 4 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) 8

The ‘elephant in the room’: Population ethics (Millner 2012) 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer

The ‘elephant in the room’: Population ethics (Millner 2012) 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) 9

Average and Classical Utilitarianism (Millner 2012) Utilitarian SWF AU fails: “SDR” + axioms Utility

Average and Classical Utilitarianism (Millner 2012) Utilitarian SWF AU fails: “SDR” + axioms Utility Independence Existence independence Negative expansion principle CU better, but fails: ‘Repugnant’ conclusion: welfare higher for large subsistence population. 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) 10

Alternatives? Utilitarian and Prioritarian Millner 2012, Fleurbaey and Zuber 2014 Critical Level Utilitarianism CLU

Alternatives? Utilitarian and Prioritarian Millner 2012, Fleurbaey and Zuber 2014 Critical Level Utilitarianism CLU better but: ‘very sadistic conclusion’ Doesn’t prioritise ‘lives worth living’ (u>0) Expected Prioritorian Equally Distributed Equivalent 13/03/2015 Population enters via distribution of well-being, u Uncertain population growth Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) 11

Conclusion �CBA is a means to an end �DU: a particular welfare framework �DU

Conclusion �CBA is a means to an end �DU: a particular welfare framework �DU can be adapted for some intergenerational issues �Beyond “meta ethics”: population, sustainability �Theoretical and practical issues for CBA of our children’s welfare 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) 12

Thanks! Ben Groom Associate Professor in Environment and Development Economics b. groom@lse. ac. uk

Thanks! Ben Groom Associate Professor in Environment and Development Economics b. groom@lse. ac. uk 13/03/2015 Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015) 13