The GB Nonnative Species Mechanism Olaf Booy GB
The GB Non-native Species Mechanism Olaf Booy GB Non-native Species Secretariat olaf. booy@fera. gsi. gov. uk
Overview § GB mechanism § Relevant GB work § Strengths and weaknesses § Looking forward
GB NNS mechanism components § Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) § Bern Convention § Ramsar Convention § European Birds Directive § European Habitats Directive (natural habitats and wild fauna and flora) § EC 2006 Communication on Halting Loss of Biodiversity by 2010
GB NNS mechanism components Defra-led Policy Review: 2001 - 2003 § Co-ordination § Risk assessment § Codes of conduct § Education and awareness § Legislation § Monitoring and surveillance § Policies for control § Stakeholder engagement
GB NNS mechanism components § Coordination GB Programme Board Non-Native Species Secretariat
GB NNS mechanism components § Delivery GB Programme Board Non-Native Species Secretariat
GB NNS mechanism components § Delivery Strategy Working Group GB Programme Board Non-Native Species Secretariat
GB NNS mechanism components § Defra Chair § 3 Govts represented § § Agencies Plant and Animal Health Customs Limited Transport representation § Conservation NGOs § Trade Representatives
GB NNS mechanism components § Strategy Aim § Sets out a high-level policy framework providing a context for national, regional and local initiatives
1 Prevention GB Strategy
1 Prevention GB Strategy 2 Monitoring and Rapid response
1 Prevention GB Strategy 2 Monitoring and Rapid response 3 Control
Awareness Co-ordination 1 Legislation Prevention GB Strategy 2 Information exchange Monitoring and Rapid response 3 Control
Co-ordination Awareness Prevention Legislation GB Strategy Information exchange Monitoring and Rapid response Control
Media and comms Rapid response Stakeholder sounding board Working groups CDR Country working groups Stakeholder forum Public awareness survey Stakeholders NNRAP GB strategy Consultations RA tool, management module, NNRAP and process functioning First EU country to develop a specific RA process (non-native species secretariat) Risk analysis mechanism Media and communications strategy NNSS website Develop means for collecting and collating information Provide early warning function Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act (2004) Template being developed Field guide Information exchange Monitoring and Rapid response Surveillance, monitoring and detection CDR Horizon scanning Links with Ireland EU representation RR Working group Provide survey protocols Fat headed minnow Oak processionary moth GB Programmes Provide source of best practice guidance Japanese knotweed biocontrol research Develop national and regional priorities Encourage effective partnerships Ruddy duck eradication Training ISAPs Develop database of control projects Develop support tools fora Identify sources of funding Acknowledge regional priorities Designate coordinating body Links with OTs Provide links to fora on NNSS website Country working groups CDR NNSS represent GB on Invasive Species Ireland NNSS maintain links with FCO and overseas territory initiatives Defra represent UK in Europe Control Review and help develop the EU invasive species strategy Didemnum Xenopus Promotion of regional / local fora Resource audit Topmouth Gudgeon Ludwigia Identify sources of funding Coordinating body protocol Initial action Bullfrog Review of Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981) Schedule 9 GB Strategy PAPs Training ID sheets Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act (2006) Legislation ID information International biodiversity day Key stakeholders Legislative review Scotland Prevention Raising awareness Key messages Awareness Co-ordination ISAPs Identifying priorities Media and communications strategy Media and communications working group Template developed Currently 10 species assessed (72 underway) Code of practice for key pathways NNSS website Training Programme Board Identification info Prioritising species Provide source of best practice guidance, ID information, risk assessments etc
GB NNS mechanism components Strategy Working Group Media and Comms. Working Group Stakeholder Involvement Forum Sounding Board Other Working Groups GB Programme Board Non-Native Risk Analysis Mechanism Non-Native Species Secretariat Country Working Groups Monitoring Rapid Response Working Group Existing Species New Detections Horizon Scanning
Risk analysis RA tool, management module, NNRAP and process functioning First EU country to develop a specific RA process Template developed Currently 10 species assessed (72 underway) Media and communications strategy Risk analysis mechanism Contingency plans Raising awareness ID information International biodiversity day Training Prevention Field guide NNSS website PAPs ID sheets Horizon Scanning Template being developed
Work ongoing in GB § Horizon Scanning
Risk analysis Evidence Decision Risk assessment / risk management Prioritisation Determining responsibility Planning Action Follow up
Risk analysis § Based on EPPO system § Just over 70 questions
Risk analysis stakeholders screening relevant authorities Initiation Peer review Risk assessment NNRAP GB Programme Board Public comment
Surveillance and alerts Develop means for collecting and collating information Provide early warning function Horizon scanning Surveillance, monitoring and detection CDR Provide survey protocols Monitoring and Rapid response ISAPs Topmouth Gudgeon RR Working group Initial action Identify sources of funding Ludwigia Xenopus Didemnum Bullfrog Oak processionary moth Fat headed minnow Coordinating body protocol Resource audit
Under recording Didemnum vexillum 2008 2009
Data flow Horse-Chestnut Leaf-miner NBN Forest Research
NNSIP PORTAL
NNSIP RISC PORTAL
NNSIP GB Stakeholders RISC PORTAL
NNSIP GB Stakeholders RISC PORTAL Alert! Rapid response
NNSIP European and global schemes RISC GB Stakeholders PORTAL Alert! Rapid response
Get more images American Bullfrog Download ID sheet Download action plan Download risk assessment Download this fact sheet Projects Short Description Bullfrogs are up to twice the length of the native common frog, and draw attention by their loud, deep calls. The ear drum is obviously larger than the eye, with a conspicuous dark outer ring. The lack of skin folds along the back, and the single vocal sac positioned beneath the chin, help to distinguish this from other non-native frogs in Britain. Impacts The bullfrog is listed by IUCN as one of the most harmful invasive species. It both competes with and eats native amphibians, and carries a disease that has contributed to worldwide amphibian decline and to several global extinctions. Habitat It occupies any type of still or slowly moving water, especially where aquatic and bank vegetation are abundant. www. nonnativespecies. org
Actions plans ID resources Risk assessments Get more images American Bullfrog Download ID sheet Photo Gallery Download action plan Download risk assessment Download this fact sheet Projects database Short Description Bullfrogs are up to twice the length of the native common frog, and draw attention by their loud, deep calls. The ear drum is obviously larger than the eye, with a conspicuous dark outer ring. The lack of skin folds along the back, and the single vocal sac positioned beneath the chin, help to distinguish this from other non-native frogs in Britain. Distribution data (NBN) Impacts The bullfrog is listed by IUCN as one of the most harmful invasive species. It both competes with and eats native amphibians, and carries a disease that has contributed to worldwide amphibian decline and to several global extinctions. Habitat It occupies any type of still or slowly moving water, especially where aquatic and bank vegetation are abundant. www. nonnativespecies. org Technical information
DETECTION Response VERIFICATION PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT DELIVERY PHASE EVALUATION Determine responsible body using decision tree
Predicted costs: Eradication now = £ 21, 000 Eradication once widespread = £ 467, 000
Rapid Response
Strengths • Central strategy • Developing mechanisms (e. g. PB, NNSS, RR) Weaknesses • Not all mechanisms developed • Slow RA process • No agreed lists • RA / EPPO Model • Surveillance • Close links across GB and Ireland • No formal Horizon Scanning connection with Europe
Future plans § § Horizon Scanning within GB Risk analysis (pathways) Improve surveillance Research, training and education
Conclusions § Coordinated early warning is needed § Elements of this are underway in GB § Keen to engage with this within Europe and the rest of the world § Looking forward to progress in this area
End
- Slides: 42