The Effects of PNF Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility
The Effects of PNF Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility in Female Collegiate Soccer and Volleyball Players By: Kristina Everding, Emily Lensing, Shannon Ditsch, and Danielle Vujovic
Introduction �Hamstring flexibility in female soccer and volleyball players �Benefits in PNF stretching �Volleyball players more flexible
Introduction Cont. �Three large muscle groups:
Introduction Cont. �Tested three types of PNF stretching: Hold and Relax Contract and Relax with opposing muscle contraction �PNF relies on neuromuscular characteristics in order to relax the muscles �Improve flexibility by inhibiting muscle contraction
Introduction Cont. �Studies are very contradictory �More research needed
Participants � 24 total NCAA Division III female athletes � 12 soccer players � 12 volleyball players �All were between the ages of 18 -23 �No current hamstring injuries �Participants for each team had similar fitness levels
Measures, Instruments, Tasks �V Sit and Reach Box Used to measure flexibility of lower back and hamstrings
Measures, Instruments, Tasks �V Sit and Reach Test Protocol Sitting on the ground Legs straight out in front with knees flat to the ground with no shoes on Feet are pressed against the V Sit and Reach Box Participant will reach with both hand push the knob as far as they can They did they 3 times and took their best score
Measures, Instruments, Tasks �Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) Hold-Relax Contract-Relax with opposing muscle contraction
Procedure � 6 different trial days (nonconsecutive) �On days of normal practice/workouts �Took place in AWC for volleyball �Took place in Rockbowl for soccer �Trials were conducted immediately after practice
Procedure �Half of the trial were followed by PNF stretching (2, 4, 6) �Other half was without PNF stretching (1, 3, 5) �On the stretching days, we split up the participants to ensure more accurate results Stay warm and loose
Results �Mean scores were found for each participant �A Dependent Samples T-test was conducted Non- stretching mean: M=35. 84 cm PNF stretching mean: M=37. 35 cm There was a significant difference ▪ P value: 0. 001 and T value: -3. 916
Dependent Samples T-Test No Stretching Mean Standard Deviation 35. 8403 9. 9618 Degrees of Freedom 23 PNF Stretching 37. 3472 9. 35930 T-value P-value -3. 916 . 001
The Effects of PNF Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility in Female Collegiate Soccer and Volleyball Players 37, 8 37, 3 36, 8 Sit and Reach Scores (cm)36, 3 35, 8 35, 3 34, 8 No Stretching Mode PNF Stretching
Results �Two Independent Sample T-tests were conducted Test 1: to determine if significant difference in scores before PNF stretching ▪ Mean score for soccer players: M= 36. 97 cm ▪ Mean score for volleyball players: M=34. 71 cm ▪ Significant difference not was found (P=0. 473, t=. 548)
Independent Samples T-Test (no stretching) Mean Standard Deviation Degrees of Freedom Soccer 36. 9722 8. 991 22 Volleyball 34. 7083 11. 130 T-value P-value . 548 . 473
Results Test 2: to determine if difference in scores after PNF stretching ▪ Mean score for soccer players: M=38. 53 cm ▪ Mean score for volleyball players: M=36. 12 cm ▪ Significant difference was not found (p=0. 400, t=. 609)
Independent Samples T-Test (PNF stretching) Mean Standard Deviation Degrees of Freedom Soccer 38. 5278 2. 534 22 Volleyball 36. 1667 2. 930 T-value P-value . 609 . 400
Conclusion �Accept hypothesis 1 -PNF stretching increased ROM �This agrees with Silva et al. (2012), as they found that PNF stretching promotes a greater range of motion.
Conclusion Cont. �Reject hypothesis 2 -Female soccer players had higher V Sit and Reach results than volleyball players. However, this difference was not significant.
Extraneous Variables �Weather conditions �Intensity levels �Efficiency of data collection �Soreness of athlete
Future Studies �Longer study duration �More participants �Smaller test administrator to participant ratio �Male study
References Che-Hsiu, C. , Tsun-Shun, H. , Huei-Ming, C. , Mei-Hwa, J. , & Jiu-Jenq, L. (2013). Two stretching treatments for the hamstrings: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation versus kinesio taping. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 22(1), 59 -66. Chow, T. Y. , & Nag, G. F. (2010). Active, passive and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching are comparable in improving the knee flexion range in people with total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 24(10), 911 -918. Davis, D. , Ashby, P. E. , Mc. Cale, K. L. , Mc. Quain, J. A. , & Wine, J. M. (2005). The effectiveness of 3 stretching techniques on hamstring flexibility using consistent stretching parameters. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 19(1), 27 -32. Franco, B. L. , Signorelli, G. R. , Tragano, G. S. , Costa, P. B. , & Oliveira, C. G. (2012). Acute effects of three different stretching protocols on the wingate test performance. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 11(1), 1 -7. Jordan, B. , Korgaokar, A. , Farley, R. , & Caputo, J. (2012). Acute effects of static and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on agility performance in elite youth soccer players. International Journal of Exercise Science, 5(2), 97 - 105. Pereira, M. , & Gonçalves, M. (2012). Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation improves balance and knee extensors strength of older fallers. ISRN Rehabilitation, 1 -7. Rubini, E. , Souza, A. , Mello, M. , Bacurau, R. , Cabral, L. , & Farinatti, P. (2011). Immediate effect of static and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on hip adductor flexibility in female ballet dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 15(4), 177 -181. Silva, S. B. , De Faria, E. M. , Almeida, J. B. , Bernardes, R. C. , Valenti, V. E. , Vanderlei, L. M. , & De Abreu, L. (2012). Effects of two proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques in different planes on hamstrings muscles of healthy subjects. Healthmed, 6(7), 2332 -2338.
- Slides: 23