The Effect of Spray Tips and Spray Volumes

  • Slides: 25
Download presentation
The Effect of Spray Tips and Spray Volumes on Glyphosate and Paraquat Efficacy Cathy

The Effect of Spray Tips and Spray Volumes on Glyphosate and Paraquat Efficacy Cathy L. Minihan, Dallas E. Peterson, Robert E. Wolf, & J. Anita Dille

INTRODUCTION • Higher spray volumes and smaller spray droplets theoretically should provide the most

INTRODUCTION • Higher spray volumes and smaller spray droplets theoretically should provide the most thorough coverage assuming the spray droplets reach the intended target. • Spray volume, pressure, and spray tips influence spray droplet size. • Thorough spray coverage is probably more critical with contact than systemic herbicides.

OBJECTIVE • Determine the effect of spray tips and spray volumes on paraquat and

OBJECTIVE • Determine the effect of spray tips and spray volumes on paraquat and glyphosate efficacy with early and late postemergence applications to oats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS • Location & Years: Manhattan, KS 2000, 2001 • Experimental Design:

MATERIALS AND METHODS • Location & Years: Manhattan, KS 2000, 2001 • Experimental Design: 2 x 3 Factorial Herbicides Spray Tips Spray Volumes • Herbicides: Glyphosate & Paraquat • Spray Tips: XR Flat Fan Turbo Tee. Jet Air Induction

MATERIALS AND METHODS • Spray Volumes: 47 L ha-1 (110015) 94 L ha-1 (11003)

MATERIALS AND METHODS • Spray Volumes: 47 L ha-1 (110015) 94 L ha-1 (11003) 187 L ha-1 (11006) • Spray Pressures: 262 -276 k. Pa • Early Postemergence: • Late Postemergence: Oats 15 cm Oats 50 cm • Visual Ratings: 1, 2, 4 WAT

XR Flat Fan Turbo Tee. Jet Air Induction

XR Flat Fan Turbo Tee. Jet Air Induction

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION EARLY POSTEMERGENCE EXPERIMENTS 2000 -2001

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION EARLY POSTEMERGENCE EXPERIMENTS 2000 -2001

Early Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Herbicide and Spray Tips, 2000.

Early Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Herbicide and Spray Tips, 2000. (averaged across spray volumes) a a b c d c

Early Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Spray Volume, 2000. (averaged across

Early Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Spray Volume, 2000. (averaged across herbicides and tips) LSD(0. 05)=NS

Early Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Herbicides and Spray Volumes, 2001.

Early Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Herbicides and Spray Volumes, 2001. (averaged across spray tips) a b d c c d

Early Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Spray Tips And Volumes, 2001.

Early Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Spray Tips And Volumes, 2001. (averaged across herbicides) b a bc cd de e fg f g

EARLY POSTEMERGENCE 2000 HERBICIDE X SPRAY TIP SPRAY VOLUMES SIGNIFICANT NOT SIGNIFICANT 2001 HERBICIDE

EARLY POSTEMERGENCE 2000 HERBICIDE X SPRAY TIP SPRAY VOLUMES SIGNIFICANT NOT SIGNIFICANT 2001 HERBICIDE X VOLUME SPRAY TIP X VOLUME SIGNIFICANT

LATE POSTEMERGENCE EXPERIMENTS 2000 -2001

LATE POSTEMERGENCE EXPERIMENTS 2000 -2001

Late Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Spray Tips, 2000. (averaged across

Late Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Spray Tips, 2000. (averaged across herbicides & volumes) LSD(0. 05)=NS

Late Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Spray Volumes, 2000. (averaged across

Late Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Spray Volumes, 2000. (averaged across herbicides & spray tips) a a b

Late Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Spray Tips, 2001. (averaged across

Late Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Spray Tips, 2001. (averaged across herbicides & volumes) LSD(0. 05)=NS

Late Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Herbicide and Spray Volumes, 2001.

Late Postemergence Oat Control 2 WAT As Influenced By Herbicide and Spray Volumes, 2001. (averaged across spray tips) a b c e c d

LATE POSTEMERGENCE 2000 SPRAY VOLUME SPRAY TIPS SIGNIFICANT NOT SIGNIFICANT 2001 HERBICIDE X VOLUME

LATE POSTEMERGENCE 2000 SPRAY VOLUME SPRAY TIPS SIGNIFICANT NOT SIGNIFICANT 2001 HERBICIDE X VOLUME SIGNIFICANT SPRAY TIPS NOT SIGNIFICANT

47 L ha-1 94 L ha-1 187 L ha-1 Late postemergence paraquat 1 WAT

47 L ha-1 94 L ha-1 187 L ha-1 Late postemergence paraquat 1 WAT applied with spray volumes of 47, 94, 187 L ha-1, 2000.

47 L ha-1 94 L ha-1 187 L ha-1 Late postemergence glyphosate 1 WAT

47 L ha-1 94 L ha-1 187 L ha-1 Late postemergence glyphosate 1 WAT applied with spray volumes of 47, 94, 187 L ha-1, 2000.

47 L ha-1 94 L ha-1 187 L ha-1 Late postemergence oat control 2

47 L ha-1 94 L ha-1 187 L ha-1 Late postemergence oat control 2 WAT with glyphosate at 47, 94, and 187 L ha-1 spray volumes , 2000.

CONCLUSIONS • Even though oat control with glyphosate and paraquat was different, the response

CONCLUSIONS • Even though oat control with glyphosate and paraquat was different, the response to spray tips and spray volumes was similar. • Oat control at 47 and 94 L ha-1 was equal or better than at 187 L ha-1 with both herbicides. • Oat control with the Turbo Teejet, Air Induction, and XR Flat Fan tips was similar.

IMPLICATIONS • Lower spray volumes can provide equal or better weed control with more

IMPLICATIONS • Lower spray volumes can provide equal or better weed control with more efficient use of time and resources. • Use of new spray tips that produce larger spray droplets reduce the risk of spray drift while maintaining herbicide efficacy.

FUTURE RESEARCH • Confirm results with different herbicides and weeds. • Evaluate new spray

FUTURE RESEARCH • Confirm results with different herbicides and weeds. • Evaluate new spray tips and delivery systems as they are introduced into the market.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • Kansas State University Research and Extension • Syngenta • Successful Farming

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • Kansas State University Research and Extension • Syngenta • Successful Farming