The Effect of Different Brand Name Disinfectants on

The Effect of Different Brand Name Disinfectants on the Amount of Bacteria Killed By: Sapna Seth, Julia Feldman, & Ashley Elmore

Which brand name disinfectant (CloroxⓇ, LysolⓇ, or Scrubbing BubblesⓇ) is most effective at killing bacteria? Null Hypothesis: There is no statistically significant difference in the amount of bacteria killed (zone of inhibition) when bacteria comes in contact with Lysol® Power & Free Bathroom Cleaner vs. Disinfecting Scrubbing Bubbles® Bathroom Cleaner vs. Clorox® Disinfecting Bathroom Cleaner vs. deionized water.

Alternative Hypothesis 1 If Escherichia coli K-12 is disinfected with different brand name disinfectants, then the Lysol® Power & Free Bathroom Cleaner will be the most effective at killing bacteria, because it contains hydrogen peroxide, a high level disinfectant, which means it will kill all of the bacteria except for a few bacterial spores by denaturing their proteins and lipids.

Alternative Hypothesis 2 If Escherichia coli K-12 is disinfected with different brand name disinfectants, then Clorox® Disinfecting Bathroom Cleaner will be the most effective at killing bacteria, because it contains two variations of quaternary ammonium compounds that will damage the bacteria’s cell membranes by denaturing their proteins and disrupting their permeability.

Alternative Hypothesis 3 If Escherichia coli K-12 is disinfected with different brand name disinfectants, then Disinfecting Scrubbing Bubbles® Bathroom Cleaner will be the most effective at killing bacteria, because it contains four variations of quaternary ammonium compounds that will damage the bacteria’s cell membranes by denaturing their proteins and disrupting their permeability.

Alternative Hypothesis 4 If Escherichia coli K-12 is disinfected with different brand name disinfectants, then deionized water will be the most effective at killing bacteria, because the deionized water would act as a hypotonic solution. There would be more water around the bacteria than inside, and water would flood into the bacteria until they burst, damaging the bacteria.

Summary Independent Variable: Brand of Disinfectant Used Dependent Variable: Amount of Bacteria Killed Quantitative Data ANOVA Test

Bacteria are prokaryotic organisms. Escherichia coli K-12 is the type of bacteria used in this experiment. Escherichia coli K-12 is from the Enterobacteriaceae family.

Disinfectants are substances, such as heat or chemical solutions, that are used to control the growth of microorganisms. ● Disinfectants kill bacteria by: ○ Damaging cell membrane ○ Denaturing enzymes and other proteins ○ Damaging DNA

Chemicals In Disinfecting Scrubbing Bubbles® there is: Alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium fecting Bathroom Cleaner there is: n-Alkyl dimethylbenzyl ammonium chloride n-Alkyl ethylbenzyl ammonium chloride In Lysol® Power & Free Bathroom Cleaner there is: Hydrogen peroxide C 10 Ethoxylated Alcohol

Purpose of Experiment Scrubbing Bubbles®, Clorox®, and Lysol® brands all claim that their products kill 99. 9% of bacteria. This experiment was conducted in order to see which disinfectant is actually able to kill the most bacteria.

Materials & Procedure s. Incubate petri dishes for four days at 37°C. Measure zones of inhibition (mm). Properly disinfect materials.

Results

Conclusion Alternative hypothesis 3, which states, “If Escherichia coli K-12 is disinfected with different brand name disinfectants, then Disinfecting Scrubbing Bubbles® Bathroom Cleaner will be the most effective at killing bacteria, because it contains four variations of quaternary ammonium compounds that will damage the bacteria’s cell membranes by denaturing their proteins and disrupting their permeability. ” is supported.

Conclusion (Cont. ) Scrubbing Bubbles® is the most effective brand name disinfectant. Scrubbing Bubbles® damaged the bacteria’s membrane. The null hypothesis can be rejected, because the overall p-value is 0. 0001, which is less than 0. 05. Clorox® and Scrubbing Bubbles® are not statistically significant, since their p-value is greater than 0. 05.

Experimental Errors and Unusual Results There was excess disinfectant around some of the chads. All of the zones of inhibition collected for deionized water were approximately 0 mm except for one zone of inhibition which was 3 mm.

Further Research Questions Is Disinfecting Scrubbing Bubbles® able to effectively kill gram positive bacteria? Which non-brand name disinfectant is most effective at killing bacteria? What is the effect of different brand name disinfectants on another common bacteria other than E. coli K-12?

Work Cited Amazon. com, Inc. (2016). Lysol® Power and Free Bathroom Cleaner, 22 Ounce: Health and Personal Care. amazon. http: //www. amazon. com/Lysol-Power-Bathroom-Cleaner-Ounce/dp/B 0080 DTSN 4 ATTACHMENT I -- FINAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF ESCHERICHIA COLI K-12 DERIVATIVES. (1997). United States Environmental Protection Agency. https: //www. epa. gov/sites/production/files/2015 -09/documents/fra 004. pdf Berestecky, J. (2016). Control of Microorganisms. University of Hawai’i. http: //www 2. hawaii. edu/~johnb/micro/m 140/syllabus/week/handouts/m 140. 8. 2. html Case, C. , Funke B. , and Tortora, G. (2015). Microbiology: An Introduction. 12 ed. NA: Pearson, 2015. Print. Dvorak, G. (2008). Disinfection 101. The Center for Food Security and Public Health. http: //www. cfsph. iastate. edu/Disinfection/Assets/Disinfection 101. pdf Environmental Working Group. (2016). LYSOL Power & Free Bathroom Cleaner, Cool Spring Breeze. Ewg. http: //www. ewg. org/guides/cleaners/5881 -LYSOLPower. Free. Bathroom. Cleaner. Cool. Spring. Breeze Kaiser, G. E. (2009). Gram Stain of Escherichia coli. CCBC The Community College of Baltimore County. http: //faculty. ccbcmd. edu/courses/bio 141/labmanua/lab 6/gnrod. html

Work Cited Kaiser, G. E. (2012). Lab 19: Using Antimicrobial Chemotherapy to Control Microorganisms. CCBC The Community College of Baltimore County. http: //faculty. ccbcmd. edu/courses/bio 141/labmanua/lab 19. html Kaiser, G. E. (2014). Using Antibiotics and Chemical Agents to Control Bacteria. CCBC The Community College of Baltimore County. http: //faculty. ccbcmd. edu/courses/bio 141/lecguide/unit 2/control/antibio. html Lerner, K. L. & Lerner, B. W. (Eds. ). (2007). Disinfection and Disinfectants. World of Microbiology and Immunology. Detroit: Gale. http: //ic. galegroup. com/ic/scic/Reference. Details. Page/Reference. Details. Window? fail. Over. Type=&query=&prod. Id=SCIC&wino wstate=normal&content. Modules=&display-query=&mode=view&display. Group. Name=Reference&limiter=&u=lcpsh&curr. Pae =&disable. Highlighting=false&display. Groups=&sort. By=&source=&search_within_results=&p=SCIC&action=e&cat. Id=&activi ty. Type=&scan. Id=& document. Id=GALE|CV 2644650131 Miller, K. R. , & Levine, J. (2002). Prentice hall biology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Northern Arizona University. (2015). Microbiology 274. Northern Arizona University. http: //www 2. nau. edu/~fpm/bio 205/274 lect 6. html

Work Cited S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (2015). Scrubbing Bubbles® Antibacterial Scrubbing Bubbles® XXI Bathroom Cleaner - Fresh Scent. SC Johnson a Family Company. http: //www. whatsinsidescjohnson. com/us/en/brands/scrubbing-bubbles/antibacterial-scrubbing-bubbles-xxi-bathroom-cleaner---fresh-scent Snyder, K. (2009). Genomes of Two Popular Research Strains of E. coli Sequenced. BNL Newsroom. https: //www. bnl. gov/newsroom/news. php? a=11019 The Clorox Company. (2016). Clorox Commercial Solutions® Clorox® Disinfecting Bathroom Cleaner. The Clorox Company. http: //i. clx. com/product/15489 The Clorox Company. (2016). Clorox® Disinfecting Bathroom Cleaner. Clorox. https: //www. clorox. com/products/clorox-disinfecting-bathroom-cleaner/