The Assessment of Seasonal Forecast Skills from the

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
The Assessment of Seasonal Forecast Skills from the Canadian HFP Q. Teng 1, S.

The Assessment of Seasonal Forecast Skills from the Canadian HFP Q. Teng 1, S. Kharin 1, F. Zwiers 1 and X. Zhang 2 1 Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Meteorological Service of Canada Climate Research Branch, Meteorological Service of Canada 2 CCRM, Outline 1. Introduction 2. Model and Data 3. Results ● Deterministic skills ● Probabilistic skills 4. Summary

Introduction ● Basic premise: Slow variations in lower-boundary forcing (e. g. , SST; sea-ice

Introduction ● Basic premise: Slow variations in lower-boundary forcing (e. g. , SST; sea-ice cover and temperature; land surface). ● Main sources of error: ► initial conditions; ensemble prediction ► model error multi-model prediction multi-model ensemble prediction ● Forecast verification: ► deterministic measures: e. g. , mean square error (MSE); root mean square error (RMSE); root mean square skill score (RMSSS); anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) etc. ► probabilistic measures: e. g. , Brier score (BS); Brier skill score (BSS); attributes (or reliability) diagram; relative operating characteristic (ROC) and its skill score etc.

Model and Data ● Model Output Historical Forecasting Project HFP 1 (Derome et al.

Model and Data ● Model Output Historical Forecasting Project HFP 1 (Derome et al. 2001) HFP 2 Models Resolution GCM 2 (Mc. Farlane et al. 1992) T 32 L 10 SEF (e. g. , Ritchie 1991) T 63 L 23 GEM (Côté et al. 1998) 1. 875°L 50 GCM 3 (Mc. Farlane et al. 2001) T 63 L 31 Predictions MAM; JJA; SON; DJF; (1969 - 1995) JFMA; FMAM; MAMJ; AMJJ; MJJA; JJAS; JASO; ASON; SOND; ONDJ; NDJF; DJFM; (1969 - 2001) Ensemble Members 6 6 10 10 ● Verification datasets: NCEP/NCAR (Kalnay et al. 1996) and ERA-40 (Simmons and Gibson 2000) reanalyses fields ● Variables: Z 500 , T 700 & T 2 m for MAM, JJA, SON, DJF; (1969 -1995)

Bias -- Z 500 (DJF) GCM 2 SEF GEM GCM 3

Bias -- Z 500 (DJF) GCM 2 SEF GEM GCM 3

RMSE -- Z 500 NEX TR GL ERA-40 NCEP NAM North America (NAM): 20°

RMSE -- Z 500 NEX TR GL ERA-40 NCEP NAM North America (NAM): 20° - 80°N, 150° - 45°W; Northern Extra-tropics (NEX): 30° - 87. 5°N, 180°E - 180°W; Tropics (TR): 30°S - 30°N, 180°E - 180°W; Globe (GL): 87. 5°S - 87. 5°N, 180°E - 180°W. Canada (CA): 40° - 87. 5°N, 150° - 45°W; Pacific-North-America (PNA): 20° - 80°N, 180° - 60°W; Northern Hemisphere (NH): 0° - 87. 5°N, 180°E - 180°W; purple: GCM 2 green: SEF yellow: GEM red: GCM 3

RMSE NEX TR GL T 2 m T 700 Z 500 NAM GCM 2;

RMSE NEX TR GL T 2 m T 700 Z 500 NAM GCM 2; SEF; GEM; GCM 3

Brier Score (BS) and Brier Skill Score (BSS) ● BS is the MSE of

Brier Score (BS) and Brier Skill Score (BSS) ● BS is the MSE of probability forecast; where is the forecast probability; is the event variable: ● BSS

Brier Skill Score (BSS) -- Cont’d ● BSS Where ● Three methods to estimate

Brier Skill Score (BSS) -- Cont’d ● BSS Where ● Three methods to estimate P (Kharin and Zwiers 2003):

BSS -- Z 500 & T 700

BSS -- Z 500 & T 700

BSS -- Z 500 North America DJF SON JJA MAM BN NN AN

BSS -- Z 500 North America DJF SON JJA MAM BN NN AN

BSS -- Z 500 Tropics DJF SON JJA MAM BN NN AN

BSS -- Z 500 Tropics DJF SON JJA MAM BN NN AN

BSS -- Time Series (DJF Tropics) Years The year refers to the Dec. of

BSS -- Time Series (DJF Tropics) Years The year refers to the Dec. of the corresponding winter.

Decomposition of BS Following Murphy (1973), the BS can be expressed as: reliability Where

Decomposition of BS Following Murphy (1973), the BS can be expressed as: reliability Where resolution uncertainty is the number of probability bins; denotes the total number of forecast/event pairs; represents the number of times each probability forecast is used; is the observed sample relative frequency; is the observed overall relative frequency or sample climatology.

Improved Gaussian Count Attributes Diagram -- T 2 m Tropics (DJF)

Improved Gaussian Count Attributes Diagram -- T 2 m Tropics (DJF)

Improved Gaussian Count ROC -- Z 500 North America (DJF)

Improved Gaussian Count ROC -- Z 500 North America (DJF)

ROCSS Z 500 T 700 T 2 m

ROCSS Z 500 T 700 T 2 m

Summary ● The identity of the best single model varies; ● The multi-model ensemble

Summary ● The identity of the best single model varies; ● The multi-model ensemble is superior to the single model ensembles; ● The raw Gaussian fit method is generally better than the count method, while the statistically improved technique may not always be beneficial.

Acknowledgments Juan-Sebastian Fontecilla, Normand Gagnon, Fouad Majaess and Steve Lambert.

Acknowledgments Juan-Sebastian Fontecilla, Normand Gagnon, Fouad Majaess and Steve Lambert.