The Army Plan Purpose Develop strategic planning guidance

The Army Plan Purpose • Develop strategic planning guidance with senior leadership direction • Prepare mid-term, mission-oriented planning guidance using the strategic guidance • Translate mission-oriented planning guidance into functionally-oriented programming guidance Goal -Planning influencing the Army’s Program, Budget and actual

Army Planning Guidance Using MAPIT to Focus Analysis Relative Resourcing of MDEP to Program Requirement High level of resourcing but low level of importance to Mission Area Capabilities Least Important MDEPS 3/4/2021 Illustrative and not Actual MDEP Analysis Most Important MDEPs Relative Importance of MDEP to Mission Area Capabilities High level of importance to Mission Area Capabilities but low level of resourcing 2

The Army Plan and Program - Budget Cycle Jan 00 Apr 00 Jul 00 Sep 00 Jan 01 POM issues POM prep FY 0207 FY 02 -07 PB D BES FY 0203 BES prep FY 02 -03 Section III. APGM (-- Dec 2000) Section I. Army Strategic Planning Guidance (-- Jun 2000) Section II. Army Plan Guidance (-- Oct 2000) Apr 01 Jul 01 Pres. Bu d FY 0203 Sep 01 POM issues POM FY 0307 POM prep Update FY 0307 PB D Jan 02 Pres. Bu d FY 03 BES prep FY 03 The Army Plan FY 03 -17 Update POM prep FY 0409

The Army Plan Background For Official Use Only The Army Plan FY 1998 – 2013 (U) THE A RMY PLAN FY 2000 - 2015 (U) 17 75 December 1995 Classified By: LTG Blackwell, DCSOPs, HQDA Reason: 1. 5(b) Declassify on: December 2005 For Official Use Only TAP FY 98 -13 • Some strategic guidance in Sections 1 - 4 • Programming guidance in Section 5, across 14 sub-sections 24 March 1998 TAP FY 00 -15 • First “Reengineered” TAP • Examined and used best practices including other Services & OSD • Organized into 3 Sections • Included 10 Mission Areas • Approved by Sec Army & CSA TAP FY 02 -17 • Replaced 10 with 7 new Mission Areas • Applied transformation strategy • Produced draft ASPG • Produced draft APG -used TAA/MTOFs • Produced approved APGM 4 3/4/2021

The Army Plan Overview Section I Army Strategic Planning Guidance (ASPG) DAMO-SS • Relates National, OSD, and Joint strategic guidance • Provides Army leadership’s vision and guidance SA & CSA approve each Section II 3/4/2021 Feedback Section III Section II Army Planning Guidance (APG) DAMO-ZR • Expands upon Mission Areas from ASPG • Identifies capabilities to accomplish missions Feedback Army Programming Guid. Memo (APGM) PAED • Uses capabilities from APG • Identifies objectives and resource tasks by PEG Section II Army Planning Guidance - Annex - 5

The Army Plan Incorporates Transformation Strategy “WHAT WE WILL LOOK LIKE” Army Vision The 12 OCT 99 END STATE Army Plan “HOW WE WILL GET THERE” Army Strategy (ASPG) FY 02 -17 1 NOV 99 (DRAFT) END STATE GOALS LINKAGE TO END STATE GENERAL LOGIC GENERAL PHASING Section I. ASPG Long-term strategy ‘sets azimuth’ Section II. APG Mid-term capabilities Section III. APGM Mid-term program guidance Program Objective Memorandum FY 02 -07 “WHO DOES WHAT BY WHEN” Transformat ion BDE TRANSFORMATION Campaign Plan NOT PROGRAMMATIC, BUT FEEDS PROGRAMMATICS 3/4/2021 15 JAN 00 RESPONSIBILITIES / TERMS OF REFERENCE MILESTONES METRICS / ASSESSMENT PROCESS MONITOR MECHANISM 6

The Army Plan Strategic Nuclear War Covers the Spectrum… Reduce Potential Conflicts & Threats Promote Regional Stability Domestic Disaster Relief Domestic Civil Support Deter Aggression & Coercion Counter Terrorism Environmental Peace Operations Making Peace Building 3/4/2021 International War Counter. Insurgency t a b om Deploy, Fight, and Win MTWs Support Homeland Defense Spectrum of Peace Provide Domestic Support Limited Conventional Conflict C f o Spectrum Security Assistance Arms Control Raids Strikes Regional Conventional Tactical Nuclear Conflict War Conduct SSC Operations Peace Counter Enforcement Drug Show of Nation Sanctions Force Assistance Enforcement Non-Combatant Peace Humanitarian Evacuation Keeping Occupations 7 Mission Areas -Responsive & Dominant across the 7

Army Planning Guidance DCSOPS Considers MTOF Scenarios MTOF Process os e c es ri a n TAP Process CINC Intent Us Mission Task Organized Force (MTOF) Regional Scenarios Peace Enforcement - Balkans Peacekeeping - Sinai Army Planning Guidanc TL J - U ks Strategic F O Tas Theater T M P Concept e A Us in T Essential Noncombatant Evacuation Operation - Nigeria Peacekeeping - Peru/Ecuador Section II Strategic Theater Objectives L e Us T UJ e - Annex - UJTL Tasks Conditions Humanitarian Assistance - Congo Maritime Interdiction Operation - Iran Standards Counter Drug - Columbia Consequence Management TAA National Missile Defense Force Structure TOF Critical Infrastructure Protection Disaster Relief Base Engagement Force Base Generating Force Major Theater War 3/4/2021 Universal Joint Task List (UJTL) MTOF 8

Army Planning Guidance Uses “METL-like” Structure 7 Mission Areas • Promote Regional Stability • Reduce Potential Conflicts and Threats • Deter Aggression and Coercion • Conduct SSC Operations • Deploy, Fight, and Win MTWs • Support Homeland Defense • Provide Domestic Support Section II Mission Area Structure Mission Area (definition) • Objectives – Tasks • Capabilities – Performance Standards Prioritizes

Army Planning Guidance Provides Capabilities-Based Planning Programming/Budgeting A Task may be required in more than one Mission Area; and a Capability may be required in more than one Task MA 1 Cap 1 Task 2 Cap 3 Reducing or eliminating resources for a Task or Capability in one Mission Area, does not change requirement for the same Task or Capability in another MA MA 2 Task 3 Cap 1 Task 4 Cap 5 MA 1 Task 5 Cap 1 Task 2 Cap 3 MA 2 Task 3 Cap 1 Task 4 Cap 5 Task 5 Capability-Based Planning involves- • Identifying all required capabilities to accomplish each Mission Area • And, if a later decision alters a mission or reduces or eliminates resources for task or capability in a Mission Area, this decision does not change requirement for capability in other Mission Area 3/4/2021 10

Army Planning Guidance Mission Area Wiring Diagram DCSOPS ODCSOP & Secretariat Co-leads at Mission Area Level (LTG Ellis) ADCSOPS DAMO-ZR (MG Kensinger) (COL Palmatier) DAMO-SS DAMO-OD (General Officer) PRS PCT MTW SHD SSC DAC PDS DAMO-SSP DAMO-SSD DAMO-SSW COL ____ COLBrown COL Brown DAMO-SSW DAMO-ODO DAMO-ODS COL Brown COL ____ LTC Scott COL Fitton DUSA-IA ASA(ALT) ASA(M&RA) SAUS COL Morgan COL Grabowski Mr. Damstetter COL Demasi LTC Hersey COL Smoot VACANT MAs provide a deliberate link from strategic guidance to essential capabilities. 3/4/2021 11

Army Planning Guidance Linking Capabilities To Programming Mission Area To Programming Integration Tool (MAPIT) provides the means for linking and defining the importance of a specific MDEP to a specific Capability Mission Area Hierarchy PEG Hierarchy MSN AREA 1 PEG 1 OBJ 1 Task 2 Sub-OBJ 1 Capability 1 OBJ 1 Capability 2 Capability 3 TASK 1 MDEP A MDEP B TASK 2 TASK 3 TASK 4 MDEP C MDEP D Planning to Programming relationship -3/4/2021 • A Mission Area Capability may receive resources from many MDEPs • An MDEP may support many Mission Area Capabilities 12

The Army Plan The Intent Use Operationally Focused Planning To Shape and Defend the Army Program TAP Section III THE WHITE HOUSE DECEMBER 1999 Army Programming Guidance Memorandum The Army Vision: Soldiers on point Man Tng Eq Org Sust Inst for the Nation Promote Regional Stability transforming the Reduce Potential Conflicts and Threats most respected Army in the Deter Aggression and Coercion Planning POM: world into a Guidance: Conduct Smaller Scale Contingency Ops Capabilities Resourced strategically Deploy, Fight & Win Major Theater Wars Required responsive force Support Homeland Defense that is dominant Provide Domestic Support across the full spectrum of OSD Issues operations Army POM & (APGM) TAP Section I Army Strategic Planning Guidance (ASPG) Transformation Strategy TAP Section II Army Planning Guidance (APG) Mission Areas and Capabilities 3/4/2021 MDEPs Resourced Budget Estimate and 13 Army Answers

Army Planning Guidance Using MAPIT to Focus Analysis Relative Resourcing of MDEP to Program Requirement High level of resourcing but low level of importance to Mission Area Capabilities Least Important MDEPS 3/4/2021 Illustrative and not Actual MDEP Analysis Most Important MDEPs Relative Importance of MDEP to Mission Area Capabilities High level of importance to Mission Area Capabilities but low level of resourcing 14

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF MAPIT Web-based, User Friendly Interface Provides: • Hierarchy • Rating Bars • General Information • Definitions • Reports • Help MAPIT generates the interface and stores inputs by using: • Current Planning Database (TAP MAS) • Current Programming Database (PROBE) Quality Function Deployment (QFD): • Used to determine the relative importance of MDEPs. • Systematic, straight forward, well defined approach. Prioritized MDEPs (Based on Mission Area) 15 3/4/2021

The Army Plan and Program - Budget Cycle Jan 00 Apr 00 Jul 00 Sep 00 Jan 01 POM issues POM prep FY 0207 FY 02 -07 PB D BES FY 0203 BES prep FY 02 -03 Section III. APGM (-- Dec 2000) Section I. Army Strategic Planning Guidance (-- Jun 2000) Section II. Army Plan Guidance (-- Oct 2000) Apr 01 Jul 01 Pres. Bu d FY 0203 Sep 01 POM issues POM FY 0307 POM prep Update FY 0307 PB D Jan 02 Pres. Bu d FY 03 BES prep FY 03 The Army Plan FY 03 -17 Update POM prep FY 0409

The Army Plan Summary • Provides operationally mission-oriented planning guidance • Incorporates Transformation Strategy • Integrates SECRETARIAT, ARSTAF and MACOM inputs • Links Planning Capabilities to Programming MDEPs ADCSOPS support is essential for TAP success Soldiers on point. . .