TGm Work Plan Adhoc Report IEEE 802 16

TGm Work Plan Adhoc Report IEEE 802. 16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C 802. 16 m-09/1181 r 1 Date Submitted: 2009 -05 -07 Source: Jose Puthenkulam Intel Corporation (Chair TGm Work Plan Adhoc) Voice: E-mail: +1 -5032646121 jose. p. puthenkulam@intel. com Venue: Cairo, Egypt Base Contribution: IEEE 802. 16 m Work Plan document (IEEE 802. 16 m-09/0019) Purpose: For discussion and adoption of specific updates to the Work Plan for IEEE 802. 16 m Standard & IMT-Advanced Submission Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802. 16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802. 16. Patent Policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: <http: //standards. ieee. org/guides/bylaws/sect 6 -7. html#6> and <http: //standards. ieee. org/guides/opman/sect 6. html#6. 3>. Further information is located at <http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat-material. html> and <http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat >.

Agenda • Monday Session – 7: 30 PM-10: 30 PM: – Review TGm Work Plan 09/0019 – Discussion of TGm Input Contributions: 1160 (John Humbert) , 0762 r 2 (Jose Puthenkulam) – Decision Discussion • Wednesday Session – 1: 30 PM – 5: 20 PM – Decision Discussion Continued… • Feature RG Timelines for Work Plan Update / Feature RG process • TGm Timeline Updates – More details for Sponsor Ballot/Rev. Com steps • ITU-R Liaison Group Update – Do we need to ballot IMT-Adv proposal? • TGm Call for Comments/Contributions for July – Closing Summary

Monday Discussion & Decisions • Monday Session : – Decision Discussion • Feature RG process: Inclusion of Feature in SB – – Consensus: No features should be included during SB. • Specific Feature Removal or Limiting scope of Feature – – Straw Poll#1 – Ready to drop features this meeting: Y= 11; N=8; A=2 – Straw Poll#2 – Allow limiting scope of features instead of dropping them: Y=10; N=8; A=3; – Consensus was to bring CRs to SRD and SDD to drop or modify features

Closing Summary • Proposed Updates to the TGm Work Plan – Slides added to 802. 16 m-09/0019 r 1 • Updated slide #5 to avoid introducing features during Sponsor Ballot (Slide #6 in this report) • Added feature RG timelines as a new slide #7 (Slide #7 in this report) • Updated Timeline slide #4 to reflect some more details of milestones (Slide #8 in this report) • Draft CFC for July Session – Call for comments if LB is not started this session – Call for contributions for Femto Cell Feature RG. • Draft cover letter was identified as needed for initiating letter ballot

TGm Work Plan Updates

Proposed Process for staging 802. 16 m Amendment feature development PHY/MAC features required for IMTAdvanced for a working system P 802. 16 m draft AWD Feature inclusion vote 50% SB WG LB 75% Final feature addition meeting 50% Feature 1 RG Feature 2 RG Feature N+1 RG Amendment Feature development: -Feature developed as a RG contribution to TGm -Finally included only as a complete proposal, not a partial one -Develop as a self contained clause/subclause unless it is essential -Do not put place holders in Amendment till the feature is ready. (SDD will still have all features) -RGs should track Amendment development for consistency -WG LB recirculation scope should allow feature addition -All features have to go thru at least one WG LB recirculation AWD = Amendment Working Doc Next Project (New PAR) RG = Rapporteur Group LB = Letter Ballot 6 SB= Sponsor Ballot

Proposed Amendment Feature RG timelines SDD Cha pter Features to be discussed in RGs CFC Issued for Feature Essential for IMT-Adv. at Amendment level detail RG Target for completion 12 Inter-Radio Access Technology Functions (No SDD text) No NA ---- 13 LBS No To be decided in July’ 09 Nov’ 09 14 E-MBS No To be decided in July’ 09 Nov’ 09 15 Relay No To be decided in July’ 09 Nov’ 09 16 Co-deployment and Coexistence (No SDD text. Section deleted this session) No NA ---- 17 Femtocell No May’ 09 Sept’ 09 18 Self organizing networks No To be decided in July’ 09 Nov’ 09 20 Interference Mitigation No Mar’ 09 Sept’ 09 22 Inter-ABS Synchronization No To be decided in July’ 09 Nov’ 09 7

Proposed TGm Timelines Q 2 IEEE 802. 16 System Requirements Evaluation Methodology System Description IMT Advanced Proposal 2007 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 2008 Q 2 Q 3 ITU-R IMT Advanced Circular Letter IMT. EVAL Q 1 Q 2 2009 Q 3 Q 4 2010 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Sep ’ 07* Amendment Ready for IMT-Adv evaluation Jan’ 08* Amendment Feature Complete. EC Conditional Approval for SB. Nov ’ 07 EC Conditional Approval for Rev. Com submission Jan 09* Amendment Ready for Industry Release. Rev. Com submission ITU based Updates Jan ’ 09 Sept ’ 09* Final Proposal Nov ’ 08 Refinements July ’ 09 Working Doc Jan’ 10 Letter Ballot ITU-R WP 5 D May ’ 10 Sponsor Ballot Jun ’ 08 ITU based potential updates Oct ’ 08 Jan’ 09 Oct ’ 09 Proposal Submission IMT. RSPEC Q 4 Apr May. Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May. Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov. Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May. Jun Jul Aug. Sep Oct Nov Dec 802. 16 m Amendment IMT. TECH Q 4 Jun ’ 10 Proposal Evaluation & Consensus Building Develop Recommendation Apr May. Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May. Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec *System Requirements and Evaluation Methodology, System Description, IMT-Advanced Proposal Documents may be further updated based on ITU output (shown by dotted lines). 8 3

Attendees/Affiliation • • • • • • Jose Puthenkulam, Intel John Humbert, Sprint Mitsuo Nohara, KDDI R&D Labs Jaeweon Cho, Samsung Rakesh Taori, Samsung Wonil Roh, Samsung David Mcginniss, Clearwire Michiharu Nakamura, Fujitsu Chung-Lien Ho, ITRI Changlan Tsai, ITRI Rainer Ullmann, Wavesat Apostolos Papathanassiou, Intel Hassan Yaghoobi, Intel Paul Cheng, Media. Tek Andreas Maeder, NEC Linghang Fan, NEC Min-seok Oh, LG Jin-Sam Kwak, LG Sean Cai, ZTE Xu Ling, ZTE Mary Chion, ZTE Dong Seung Kwon, ETRI Nader Zein, NEC • • • • • • Hsuan-Jung Su, NTU Vinod Ramaswamy, CEWIT J. Klutto Milleth, CEWIT Kiran Kuchi, CEWIT Phil Barber, Huawei Brian Kiernan, Interdigital Hai Wang, Samsung Rongzhen Yang, Intel Ping Wang, Intel Steve Crowley, NTT Do. Co. Mo Ahmed Shalash, Cairo University Seng. Baol, Fujitsu Jie Zhang, Fujitsu Dan Gal, ALU Takashi Shono, Intel Mohammad Madihian, NEC Tetsu Ikeda, NEC Yu-Chuan Fang, ITRI Jie Zhang, Fujitsu Kai Yu, Ericsson AB Rodrigue Rabineau, France Telecom Isamu Yoshi, Panasonic

Motions to TGm • Motion: To adopt the proposed changes in this contribution C 802. 16 m-09/1181 r 1 in slides 6, 7 and 8 and update the work plan 802. 16 m 09/0019 (including any editorial corrections) and release it as 802. 16 m-09/0019 r 1 – Mover: Jose Puthenkulam – Second: Wonil Roh – Motion Passes: 87/0/0