Testing the Manifold Hypothesis Hari Narayanan University of Washington In collaboration with Charles Fefferman and Sanjoy Mitter Princeton MIT
Manifold learning and manifold hypothesis [Kambhatla-Leen’ 93, Tannenbaum et al’ 00, Roweis-Saul’ 00, Belkin-Niyogi’ 03, Donoho-Grimes’ 04]
When is the Manifold Hypothesis true?
Reach of a submanifold of Rn reach Large reach Small reach
Low dimensional manifolds with bounded volume and reach
Testing the Manifold Hypothesis
Sample Complexity of testing the manifold hypothesis
Algorithmic question
Sample complexity of testing the Manifold Hypothesis
Empirical Risk Minimization
Fitting manifolds Tex. Point Display
Reduction to k-means
Proving a Uniform bound for k-means
Fat-shattering dimension
Bound on sample complexity
VC dimension
VC dimension
Random projection
Random projection
Bound on sample complexity
Fitting manifolds
Algorithmic question
Outline
Outline
Outline
(3) Generating a smooth vector bundle
(3) Generating a smooth vector bundle
Outline
(4) Generating a putative manifold
(4) Generating a putative manifold
(4) Generating a putative manifold
(4) Generating a putative manifold
Outline
(5) Bundle map
(5) Bundle map
Outline
Outline
Concluding Remarks • An algorithm for testing the manifold hypothesis. Future directions: (a)Make practical and test on real data (b)Improve precision in the reach – get rid of controlled constants depending on d. (c)Better algorithms under distributional assumptions