Testing means part III The twosample ttest Onesample

  • Slides: 45
Download presentation
Testing means, part III The two-sample t-test

Testing means, part III The two-sample t-test

One-sample t-test Null hypothesis The population mean is equal to o Sample Test statistic

One-sample t-test Null hypothesis The population mean is equal to o Sample Test statistic compare Null distribution t with n-1 df How unusual is this test statistic? P < 0. 05 Reject Ho P > 0. 05 Fail to reject Ho

Paired t-test Null hypothesis The mean difference is equal to o Sample Test statistic

Paired t-test Null hypothesis The mean difference is equal to o Sample Test statistic compare Null distribution t with n-1 df *n is the number of pairs How unusual is this test statistic? P < 0. 05 Reject Ho P > 0. 05 Fail to reject Ho

Comparing means • Tests with one categorical and one numerical variable • Goal: to

Comparing means • Tests with one categorical and one numerical variable • Goal: to compare the mean of a numerical variable for different groups. 4

Paired vs. 2 sample comparisons 5

Paired vs. 2 sample comparisons 5

2 Sample Design • Each of the two samples is a random sample from

2 Sample Design • Each of the two samples is a random sample from its population 6

2 Sample Design • Each of the two samples is a random sample from

2 Sample Design • Each of the two samples is a random sample from its population • The data cannot be paired 7

2 Sample Design - assumptions • Each of the two samples is a random

2 Sample Design - assumptions • Each of the two samples is a random sample • In each population, the numerical variable being studied is normally distributed • The standard deviation of the numerical variable in the first population is equal to the standard deviation in the second population 8

Estimation: Difference between two means Normal distribution Standard deviation s 1=s 2=s Since both

Estimation: Difference between two means Normal distribution Standard deviation s 1=s 2=s Since both Y 1 and Y 2 are normally distributed, their difference will also follow a normal distribution 9

Estimation: Difference between two means Confidence interval: 10

Estimation: Difference between two means Confidence interval: 10

Standard error of difference in means = pooled sample variance = size of sample

Standard error of difference in means = pooled sample variance = size of sample 1 = size of sample 2 11

Standard error of difference in means Pooled variance: 12

Standard error of difference in means Pooled variance: 12

Standard error of difference in means Pooled variance: df 1 = degrees of freedom

Standard error of difference in means Pooled variance: df 1 = degrees of freedom for sample 1 = n 1 -1 df 2 = degrees of freedom for sample 2 = n 2 -1 s 12 = sample variance of sample 1 s 22 = sample variance of sample 2 13

Estimation: Difference between two means Confidence interval: 14

Estimation: Difference between two means Confidence interval: 14

Estimation: Difference between two means Confidence interval: df = df 1 + df 2

Estimation: Difference between two means Confidence interval: df = df 1 + df 2 = n 1+n 2 -2 15

Costs of resistance to disease 2 genotypes of lettuce: Susceptible and Resistant Do these

Costs of resistance to disease 2 genotypes of lettuce: Susceptible and Resistant Do these differ in fitness in the absence of disease? 16

Data, summarized Both distributions are approximately normal. 17

Data, summarized Both distributions are approximately normal. 17

Calculating the standard error df 1 =15 -1=14; df 2 = 16 -1=15 18

Calculating the standard error df 1 =15 -1=14; df 2 = 16 -1=15 18

Calculating the standard error df 1 =15 -1=14; df 2 = 16 -1=15 19

Calculating the standard error df 1 =15 -1=14; df 2 = 16 -1=15 19

Calculating the standard error df 1 =15 -1=14; df 2 = 16 -1=15 20

Calculating the standard error df 1 =15 -1=14; df 2 = 16 -1=15 20

Finding t df = df 1 + df 2= n 1+n 2 -2 =

Finding t df = df 1 + df 2= n 1+n 2 -2 = 15+16 -2 =29 21

Finding t df = df 1 + df 2= n 1+n 2 -2 =

Finding t df = df 1 + df 2= n 1+n 2 -2 = 15+16 -2 =29 22

The 95% confidence interval of the difference in the means 23

The 95% confidence interval of the difference in the means 23

Testing hypotheses about the difference in two means 2 -sample t-test 24

Testing hypotheses about the difference in two means 2 -sample t-test 24

2 -sample t-test Test statistic: 25

2 -sample t-test Test statistic: 25

Hypotheses 26

Hypotheses 26

Null distribution df = df 1 + df 2 = n 1+n 2 -2

Null distribution df = df 1 + df 2 = n 1+n 2 -2 27

Calculating t 28

Calculating t 28

Drawing conclusions. . . Critical value: t 0. 05(2), 29=2. 05 t <2. 05,

Drawing conclusions. . . Critical value: t 0. 05(2), 29=2. 05 t <2. 05, so we cannot reject the null hypothesis. These data are not sufficient to say that there is a cost of resistance. 29

Assumptions of two-sample t tests • Both samples are random samples. • Both populations

Assumptions of two-sample t tests • Both samples are random samples. • Both populations have normal distributions • The variance of both populations is equal. 30

Two-sample t-test Null hypothesis The two populations have the same mean Sample 1 2

Two-sample t-test Null hypothesis The two populations have the same mean Sample 1 2 Test statistic compare Null distribution t with n 1+n 2 -2 df How unusual is this test statistic? P < 0. 05 Reject Ho P > 0. 05 Fail to reject Ho

Quick reference summary: Two-sample t-test • What is it for? Tests whether two groups

Quick reference summary: Two-sample t-test • What is it for? Tests whether two groups have the same mean • What does it assume? Both samples are random samples. The numerical variable is normally distributed within both populations. The variance of the distribution is the same in the two populations • Test statistic: t • Distribution under Ho: t-distribution with n 1+n 2 -2 degrees of freedom. • Formulae:

Comparing means when variances are not equal Welch’s t test 33

Comparing means when variances are not equal Welch’s t test 33

Burrowing owls and dung traps 34

Burrowing owls and dung traps 34

Dung beetles 35

Dung beetles 35

Experimental design • 20 randomly chosen burrowing owl nests • Randomly divided into two

Experimental design • 20 randomly chosen burrowing owl nests • Randomly divided into two groups of 10 nests • One group was given extra dung; the other not • Measured the number of dung beetles on the owls’ diets 36

Number of beetles caught • Dung added: • No dung added: 37

Number of beetles caught • Dung added: • No dung added: 37

Hypotheses H 0: Owls catch the same number of dung beetles with or without

Hypotheses H 0: Owls catch the same number of dung beetles with or without extra dung ( 1 = 2) HA: Owls do not catch the same number of dung beetles with or without extra dung ( 1 2) 38

Welch’s t Round down df to nearest integer 39

Welch’s t Round down df to nearest integer 39

Owls and dung beetles 40

Owls and dung beetles 40

Degrees of freedom Which we round down to df= 10 41

Degrees of freedom Which we round down to df= 10 41

Reaching a conclusion t 0. 05(2), 10= 2. 23 t=4. 01 > 2. 23

Reaching a conclusion t 0. 05(2), 10= 2. 23 t=4. 01 > 2. 23 So we can reject the null hypothesis with P<0. 05. Extra dung near burrowing owl nests increases the number of dung beetles eaten. 42

Quick reference summary: Welch’s approximate t-test • What is it for? Testing the difference

Quick reference summary: Welch’s approximate t-test • What is it for? Testing the difference between means of two groups when the standard deviations are unequal • What does it assume? Both samples are random samples. The numerical variable is normally distributed within both populations • Test statistic: t • Distribution under Ho: t-distribution with adjusted degrees of freedom • Formulae:

The wrong way to make a comparison of two groups “Group 1 is significantly

The wrong way to make a comparison of two groups “Group 1 is significantly different from a constant, but Group 2 is not. Therefore Group 1 and Group 2 are different from each other. ” 44

A more extreme case. . . 45

A more extreme case. . . 45