Temperate Grasslands Prairies N Am Great Plains Palouse

  • Slides: 54
Download presentation
Temperate Grasslands • • Prairies, (N. Am. [Great Plains, Palouse, California]) Steppes (Russia -

Temperate Grasslands • • Prairies, (N. Am. [Great Plains, Palouse, California]) Steppes (Russia - Ukraine [Hungary. Rumania]) Pampas (Argentina - Uruguay) Veldt (S. Africa); NZ tussock grasslands

Temperate grasslands prairies, steppes, pampas, veldt…. .

Temperate grasslands prairies, steppes, pampas, veldt…. .

Temperate grasslands • Prairies and steppes have continental climates characterised by large annual range

Temperate grasslands • Prairies and steppes have continental climates characterised by large annual range of temperature, cool - cold winters, with most of precipitation as snow, and hot, commonly droughty summers because of high evapotranspiration rates.

North American grasslands Calgary Cheyenne Omaha Abilene Chicago

North American grasslands Calgary Cheyenne Omaha Abilene Chicago

Palouse prairie eastern Washington, and Oregon, Idaho

Palouse prairie eastern Washington, and Oregon, Idaho

California grasslands

California grasslands

Classifying the American prairie above: Carpenter, 1940. below: Clements and Weaver, 1939.

Classifying the American prairie above: Carpenter, 1940. below: Clements and Weaver, 1939.

Mean annual temperature and precipitation in US prairies

Mean annual temperature and precipitation in US prairies

Temperature regimes Temperature (°C) (Great Plains stations)

Temperature regimes Temperature (°C) (Great Plains stations)

Precipitation regimes (west- east transect)

Precipitation regimes (west- east transect)

The prairie-forest boundary Budyko suggested that the forest grassland boundary in the midwest corresponds

The prairie-forest boundary Budyko suggested that the forest grassland boundary in the midwest corresponds with a dryness ratio* of 1. 1 -1. 2 (=dotted line) Budyko dryness ratio values, N. America Hare (1980) Atmos. -Ocean 18, 127 -153.

Pacific air mass dominance period (months of the year) 9 months <1 month 12

Pacific air mass dominance period (months of the year) 9 months <1 month 12 months <1 month

Soils • Loessic parent material - derived from aeolian reworking of glacial and fluvioglacial

Soils • Loessic parent material - derived from aeolian reworking of glacial and fluvioglacial deposits in northern North America and Europe during late glacial periods. • Limited areas of glacial, fluvioglacial, and alluvial deposits

Soil genesis • In humid areas on forest margins BRUNIZEMS are the dominant soil

Soil genesis • In humid areas on forest margins BRUNIZEMS are the dominant soil type. Characterized by moderately acid A horizon (p. H 5 -6). • In tall-grass prairies CHERNOZEMS (MOLLISOLS) are dominant. A horizon has p. H of about 6 -7. Dominant processes are melanization and calcification. Rodent (esp. gopher) and insect activity may recycle >100 ton/ha/of soil per year to surface.

Chernozem/Mollisol profiles mixed-grass Melanization Calcification short grass

Chernozem/Mollisol profiles mixed-grass Melanization Calcification short grass

Soil mosaic in humid prairies (humic gleys in hollows; soil erosion on ridges)

Soil mosaic in humid prairies (humic gleys in hollows; soil erosion on ridges)

Soil catena in dry prairies 1. Chernozem 1 2 2. Solonetz 3. Solod depression

Soil catena in dry prairies 1. Chernozem 1 2 2. Solonetz 3. Solod depression 3 Na, Mg, etc textural B; Na+ saturation of B and C horizons Solonetzic solod profile

Chernozem -solonetz mosaic in grazed steppe, Rumania S C S S S

Chernozem -solonetz mosaic in grazed steppe, Rumania S C S S S

Some common grass species 1 2 3 4 1. Andropogon gerardii (big bluestem) 2.

Some common grass species 1 2 3 4 1. Andropogon gerardii (big bluestem) 2. Bouteloua curtipendula (sideoats grama) 3. Schizachyrium scoparius (little bluestem) 4. Koeleria macrantha (? ) 5. Bouteloua gracilis (blue grama) 5

Grass-climate relations (highly schematic) W. Wyoming ~2 m tall ~1 m tall ~0. 5

Grass-climate relations (highly schematic) W. Wyoming ~2 m tall ~1 m tall ~0. 5 m tall E. Illinois

Topography and plant cover: mixed grass prairies (ungrazed)

Topography and plant cover: mixed grass prairies (ungrazed)

Grass phenology

Grass phenology

Cardinal temperatures for net photosynthesis, C 4 and C 3 plants

Cardinal temperatures for net photosynthesis, C 4 and C 3 plants

C 4 grasses: a) less tolerant of low temperatures (e. g. flowering inhibited by

C 4 grasses: a) less tolerant of low temperatures (e. g. flowering inhibited by night T <13°C) b) more tolerant of moisture deficits

10 % C 4 grasses in regional grass flora 20 30 40 50 60

10 % C 4 grasses in regional grass flora 20 30 40 50 60 80 70

Polar and tropical source areas for prairie grasses Note: no pre-Miocene grass fossils known

Polar and tropical source areas for prairie grasses Note: no pre-Miocene grass fossils known from plains area. Conclusion: Prairies developed in lee of rising Cordillera in mid. Tertiary. C 3 Agropyron, Elymus Koeleria, Poa, Stipa + sedges Bouteloua, Buchloe Andropogon C 4

Prairie forbs • Streletsk reports 180 spp of flowering plants from the Ukrainian steppes

Prairie forbs • Streletsk reports 180 spp of flowering plants from the Ukrainian steppes (only 20 of which are grasses). • In the tall-grass prairies of North America >70 spp may be in flower at once. • Forbs have variable drought tolerances and phenologies. • Flowering times range from March (e. g. Tulipa/Hyacintha in steppes) - Sept/Oct (e. g. Delphinium spp. ).

Some N. American prairie forbs 1 1. Amorpha canescens 2. Asclepias tuberosa 3. Helenium

Some N. American prairie forbs 1 1. Amorpha canescens 2. Asclepias tuberosa 3. Helenium autumnale 4. Verbena stricta 5. Aster laevis 2 3 4 5

note: 60 -80% below-ground 1000 kcal m-2 a-1 Annual production of plant biomass in

note: 60 -80% below-ground 1000 kcal m-2 a-1 Annual production of plant biomass in prairie grasslands

Biomass (ungrazed prairie)

Biomass (ungrazed prairie)

Grazers

Grazers

relatively small intake by shoot grazers vs. root suckers (predominantly nematodes) BUT is this

relatively small intake by shoot grazers vs. root suckers (predominantly nematodes) BUT is this a product of historical factors? 1000 kcal m-2 a-1 Consumption:

Rapid decline in grazer populations in last 200 years as a result of habitat

Rapid decline in grazer populations in last 200 years as a result of habitat destruction and hunting. Buffalo - almost extinct; Gophers - 98% decline 1900

Buffalo grazing: Manitoba “In vallies and humid situations, the grass grows to a great

Buffalo grazing: Manitoba “In vallies and humid situations, the grass grows to a great height, which fattens our horses in a short time, but the buffalo usually makes choice of the hilly, dry ground to feed on, the blades of grass on which are small, short and tender. When a numerous herd of these animals stay any length of time in one place, the ground is absolutely barren there for the remainder of the season…” Umfreville (1790)

Buffalo grazing: North Dakota “This afternoon I rode a few miles up Park river.

Buffalo grazing: North Dakota “This afternoon I rode a few miles up Park river. The few spots of wood along it have been ravaged by buffaloes; none but the large trees are standing. . . The small wood and brush are entirely destroyed, and even the grass is not permitted to grow. The bare ground is more trampled by these cattle than the gate of a farmyard. . . ” Alexander Henry (1801)

Was there a grazing sequence? Antelope reported to follow buffalo; they appear to prefer

Was there a grazing sequence? Antelope reported to follow buffalo; they appear to prefer heavilygrazed land with dense populations of forbs. Antilocapra americana

Colonization of old coyote burrows by gophers - effects of “dogtown” on neighbouring vegetation

Colonization of old coyote burrows by gophers - effects of “dogtown” on neighbouring vegetation pre- post- ~10 m Eastern Colorado prairies: burrow entrances shown by arrows

Effects of dogtown age on local plant cover: grassland replaced by herbaceous shubland

Effects of dogtown age on local plant cover: grassland replaced by herbaceous shubland

Carnivores (all hole ‘nesters’) Burrowing owl Kit fox Badger + swift fox, coyote, wolf,

Carnivores (all hole ‘nesters’) Burrowing owl Kit fox Badger + swift fox, coyote, wolf, bears Photo credits: Greg Lasley, Bill Standley

Pre-Pleistocene fauna • Selection of prairie flora for tolerance of heavy grazing a product

Pre-Pleistocene fauna • Selection of prairie flora for tolerance of heavy grazing a product of radiation of diverse herbivore assemblage in Mio. Pliocene. • In the Pliocene the N. American plains were home to 7 genera of horses, 12 genera of antelopes; camelids, peccaries, tapirs and rhinoceroses (plus a diverse group of carnivores) • Think of a Nebraskan ‘Serengeti’.

Pliocene plains fauna

Pliocene plains fauna

Fire on the prairies Are the tall-grass prairies a climatic climax, or is fire

Fire on the prairies Are the tall-grass prairies a climatic climax, or is fire the predominant generative and maintaining factor?

The argument in favour of fire: “I grew up in the timbered upland peninsula

The argument in favour of fire: “I grew up in the timbered upland peninsula formed by the junction of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers. The prairie began a few miles to the north and extended far into Iowa. The broad rolling uplands were prairie, whatever their age and origin, the stream-cut slopes were timbered…. . From grandparents I heard of the early days when people dared not build their houses beyond the shelter of the wooded slopes, until the plough stopped the autumnal prairie fires. In later field work in Illinois, in the Ozarks, in Kentucky, I met parallel conditions of vegetation limits coincident with breaks in relief. I gave up the search for climatic explanation of the humid prairies. ” Carl Sauer, 1969. Agricultural Origins and Dispersals.

A prairie landscape in Illinois, showing the restriction of woodland to moister (and more

A prairie landscape in Illinois, showing the restriction of woodland to moister (and more fire-proof) valley bottoms

Prairie fires: Texas “the Indians of the interior have another intolerable method, . .

Prairie fires: Texas “the Indians of the interior have another intolerable method, . . . which is to fire the plains and forests. . . both to drive the mosquitoes away and at the same time drive lizards and like things from the earth to eat. They also kill deer by encircling fires; deprived of pasturage, the animals are forced to seek it where the Indians may trap them”. Cabeza de Vaca, A. N. Relación (1542) Shipwrecked by a hurricane on the coast of Texas with his crew in 1527; Cabeza de Vaca lived with the Indians in Texas from 1528 -1535.

Prairie fires: the Dakotas “the Plains are on fire in view of the fort

Prairie fires: the Dakotas “the Plains are on fire in view of the fort on both sides of the river, it is said to be common for the Indians to burn the Plains near their Villages every Spring for the benefit of their horses and to induce the Buffalow to come near them”. Lewis and Clark’s Journals - describing their winter quarters in North Dakota in 1805.

Prairie fires: Oklahoma [Oct 31, 1832] “It was the time when hunting parties of

Prairie fires: Oklahoma [Oct 31, 1832] “It was the time when hunting parties of Indians set fire to the prairies; the herbage. . . was in that parched state, favorable to combustion. . . ” Irving, W. A. A Tour on the Prairies (1835) [Oct. 24, 1849] “ yesterday we could see the smoke of the Prairie burning in every direction but today it got close to us. It was the work of the Osages” Woodhouse, S. W. Journals (1992)

Fire and prairie restoration Fire season Spring Late-summer Flame height (L, m) 1. 9±

Fire and prairie restoration Fire season Spring Late-summer Flame height (L, m) 1. 9± 0. 4 0. 7± 0. 1 Intensity (I; k. W/m)1 1260± 520 120± 20 Litter consumption (%) 100 91± 2 II= 259. 83 L 2. 174 Data: Copeland et al. , 2002. Restoration Ecology, 10, 31

Fire and prairie restoration Data: Copeland et al. , 2002. Restoration Ecology, 10, 31

Fire and prairie restoration Data: Copeland et al. , 2002. Restoration Ecology, 10, 31 -

Fire and prairie restoration Data: Copeland et al. , 2002. Restoration Ecology, 10, 31

Fire and prairie restoration Data: Copeland et al. , 2002. Restoration Ecology, 10, 31 -

Prairies in the late Quaternary Pollen. Viewer Where were the “prairies” at LGM? Most

Prairies in the late Quaternary Pollen. Viewer Where were the “prairies” at LGM? Most LGM pollen assemblages in southern Great Plains have no modern analogues, but Neb/Kansas ~ open subalpine forest/parkland? C. Texas ~ sagebrush steppe? northern Mexico-NM ~ juniper/pinyon woodland? *see “Poaceae” and “prairie forbs”

Climatic change produces a shifting prairie forest ecotone (cf. Hypsithermal) 500 km

Climatic change produces a shifting prairie forest ecotone (cf. Hypsithermal) 500 km

Wets AD Droughts Recent (and future? ) climate change in the prairies (Moon Lake,

Wets AD Droughts Recent (and future? ) climate change in the prairies (Moon Lake, ND)