TEAS WG IETF 109 online Chairs Vishnu Pavan

TEAS WG IETF 109 [on-line] Chairs: Vishnu Pavan Beeram vbeeram@juniper. net, Lou Berger lberger@labn. net Secretary: Matt Hartley mhartley. ietf@gmail. com Online Agenda and Slides at: https: //datatracker. ietf. org/meeting/109/session/teas WG Information: https: //datatracker. ietf. org/wg/teas/ Note taking: https: //codimd. ietf. org/notes-ietf-109 -teas? both

IETF Note Well This is a reminder of IETF policies in effect on various topics such as patents or code of conduct. It is only meant to point you in the right direction. Exceptions may apply. The IETF's patent policy and the definition of an IETF "contribution" and "participation" are set forth in BCP 79; please read it carefully. As a reminder: • By participating in the IETF, you agree to follow IETF processes and policies. • If you are aware that any IETF contribution is covered by patents or patent applications that are owned or controlled by you or your sponsor, you must disclose that fact, or not participate in the discussion. • As a participant in or attendee to any IETF activity you acknowledge that written, audio, video, and photographic records of meetings may be made public. • Personal information that you provide to IETF will be handled in accordance with the IETF Privacy Statement. • As a participant or attendee, you agree to work respectfully with other participants; please contact the ombudsteam (https: //www. ietf. org/contact/ombudsteam/) if you have questions or concerns about this. Definitive information is in the documents listed below and other IETF BCPs. For advice, please talk to WG chairs or ADs: • BCP 9 (Internet Standards Process) • BCP 25 (Working Group processes) • BCP 25 (Anti-Harassment Procedures) • BCP 54 (Code of Conduct) • BCP 78 (Copyright) • BCP 79 (Patents, Participation) • https: //www. ietf. org/privacy-policy/ (Privacy Policy) Also see: http: //www. ietf. org/about/note-well. html TEAS WG - IETF 109 [on-line] - November 2020 2

• Meetecho Meeting Administrativia – Using meetecho queue control – Chat/Jabber available for use – Blue sheets • Note taking – https: //codimd. ietf. org/notes-ietf-109 -teas? both – Please help with minute taking (only discussion needs to be captured) • Online Agenda and Slides at: https: //datatracker. ietf. org/meeting/109/session/teas • Data tracker: http: //datatracker. ietf. org/wg/teas/ • Jabber: xmpp: teas@jabber. ietf. org? join • Tools: http: //tools. ietf. org/wg/teas TEAS WG - IETF 109 [on-line] - November 2020 3

Presentation Start Time 1 16: 00 2 16: 10 Duration 10 10 3 16: 20 10 4 16: 30 10 5 16: 40 5 6 16: 45 10 7 16: 55 10 8 17: 05 10 9 17: 15 10 10 17: 25 5 11 17: 30 10 12 17: 40 10 13 17: 50 5 14 17: 55 5 Adjourn 18: 00 Information Title: Draft: Presenter: Title: Draft: Presenter: Title: Draft: Presenter: Title: Draft: Presenter: Agenda Administrivia & WG Status WG Draft updates A YANG Data Model for VN Operation YANG models for VN/TE Performance Monitoring Telemetry and Scaling Intent Autonomics Traffic Engineering (TE) and Service Mapping Yang Model https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-10 https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-04 https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-05 Dhruv Dhody Applicability of Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks (ACTN) to Packet Optical Integration (POI) https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-ietf-teas-actn-poi-applicability-01 Daniel King Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic Engineering https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-ietf-teas-rfc 3272 bis-02 Adrian Farrel Definition of IETF Network Slices https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-nsdt-teas-ietf-network-slice-definition-01 Kiran Makhijani IETF Network Slice use cases and attributes for Northbound Interface of controller https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-contreras-teas-slice-nbi-03 Luis M. Contreras Packet Network Slicing using Segment Routing https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-peng-teas-network-slicing-04 Ran Chen Realizing Network Slices in IP/MPLS Networks https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-00 Tarek Saad YANG Data Model for Network Slice Per-Hop Definition https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-bestbar-teas-yang-ns-phd-00 Tarek Saad IETF Network Slice for 5 G and its characteristics https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-rokui-5 g-ietf-network-slice-00 Reza Rokui IETF Network Slice Controller and its associated data models https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-contreras-teas-slice-controller-models-00 Luis M. Contreras A Yang Data Model for IETF Network Slice NBI https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-wd-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-00 Bo Wu DC aware TE topology model https: //tools. ietf. org/html/draft-llc-teas-dc-aware-topo-model-00 Luis M. Contreras TEAS WG - IETF 109 [on-line] - November 2020 4

• Utilize the mailing list! Working Remote – Working Group consensus is determined on the mailing list – Mailing list is to be used for WG decision making and discussions • • Resolving open issues Reviewing changes to WG documents Introducing new drafts Potential new Working Group topics • on-line meetings – on-line interims can be scheduled as needed • Periodically, or as needed to cover a specific topic WG members can make requests to chairs – Likely to continue for some time in place of physical meetings • E. g. , IETF 109 is still TBD • Informal (working) meetings – WG Web. Ex is available WG members can make requests to chairs/secretary – These meetings will be announced on the WG list TEAS WG - IETF 109 [on-line] - November 2020 5

Reminder: IPR Disclosure Process • We follow process put in place in other groups as a result of very late IPR disclosures – This is not a required IETF process • Includes Polling of draft authors & contributors: 1. Prior to moving to next step in WG process a. Before an individual draft becomes a WG document and b. Before a WG document goes to last call 2. Requires IPR compliance statement from all listed in draft TEAS WG - IETF 109 [on-line] - November 2020 6

Document Status – RFCs, IESG Processing, WG LC, New Adoptions • New RFC: – RFC 8795 (was draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo) YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering (TE) Topologies • RFC-Editor's Queue: – None • IESG Processing: – draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-09 • New adoption: – draft-ietf-teas-actn-poi-applicability-01 • No new errata TEAS WG - IETF 109 [on-line] - November 2020 7

Liaisons and Communications • Received: – None • Sent: 2020 -08 -24 ccamp, mpls, pce, teas ITU-T-SG-15 Reply to LS on OTNT Standardization Work Plan – Lists recent drafts and RFCs; other WG related changes TEAS WG - IETF 109 [on-line] - November 2020 8