Team Caltech Project Review 8 December 2004 Richard

Team Caltech Project Review 8 December 2004 Richard Murray Elliott Andrews Ben Brantley Joel Burdick Lars Cremean Kristo Kriechbaum Pietro Perona Engineering and Applied Science California Institute of Technology DGC Rev, 8 Dec 04 R. M. Murray, Caltech 1

Goals and Agenda Goals ŸProvide an overview of our plans for CS/EE/ME 75 and obtain feedback on educational objectives and approach ŸObtain feedback on the Team Caltech management plan ŸPresent our preliminary system architecture and system/subsystem specification Agenda 11: 00 11: 10 11: 30 11: 45 Introductions and Welcome Project management (Murray) Overall system spec (Cremean) Response to Aug review (Murray) 2: 30 Terrain architecture and specification 3: 00 Embedded systems architecture and specification 3: 30 Break 3: 45 Review team feedback 4: 00 Adjourn 12: 00 Lunch (review team + IPT) 1: 00 Planning architecture and specs 1: 45 Vehicle architecture and specs 2: 15 Break DGC Rev, 8 Dec 04 R. M. Murray, Caltech 2

Review Participants Review Team Ÿ Alex Fax (NGC) Ÿ Duane Mc. Ruer (STI) Ÿ Kenny Meyer (JPL) Ÿ Chris Pederson (AI Motorvators) Ÿ Bob Rasmussen (JPL) Ÿ David van Gogh (NGC) Instructors Ÿ Elliott Andrews (DGC) Ÿ Ben Brantley (CS) Ÿ Joel Burdick (ME) Ÿ Lars Cremean (ME) Ÿ Kristo Kriechbaum (ME) Ÿ Richard Murray (CDS) Ÿ Pietro Perona (EE) DGC Rev, 8 Dec 04 CS/EE/ME 75 Ÿ Barnor, Henry Ÿ Berch, Ezra Ÿ Breuer, Luke Ÿ Cable, Ryan Ÿ Cady, Eric Ÿ Chen, David Ÿ Cossel, Kevin Ÿ Craig, Adam Ÿ Donnellan, Nathan Ÿ Dunklee, Kevin Ÿ Farmer, Ryan Ÿ Feingold, Josh Ÿ Fisher, Ken Ÿ Foote, Tully Ÿ Friis, Michael Ÿ Gillula, Jeremy Ÿ Gremmer, Ike R. M. Murray, Caltech Ÿ Heyneman, Barrett Ÿ Hines, George Ÿ Hong, Sue Ann Ÿ Huang, Haomiao Ÿ Jeanty, Cedric Ÿ Kumura, Margot Ÿ Lamb, Jeff Ÿ Leibs, Jeremy Ÿ Lindzey, Laura Ÿ Pallet, Elliott Ÿ Pickett, Ben Ÿ Rosen, David Ÿ Sexson, Ben Ÿ Soudek, Daniel Ÿ Stewart, Alex Ÿ Tjia, Arthur Ÿ Wang, Chenzhe Ÿ Yosinski, Jason 3

Meeting Format and Process Morning session: overview ŸDescribe how Team Caltech is managed and operated ŸDescribe the high level specifications and timeline ŸRespond to issues raised at the last review Afternoon session: architecture/specs ŸPresentations by student teams ŸPlanned architecture and specifications ŸHave tried to leave 1/3 of time for questions, with substantial breaks Feedback Mechanisms Ÿ Requests for Action (RFAs) ú Allow reviewers to provide specific requests for action by team ú RFAs will be entered into Bugzilla and reported on at the next review Ÿ Architecture Review Assessments ú Allow reviewers to assess each component of team presentations ú Forms will be provided to team at end of the review Ÿ Review team feedback ú Review team to collect thoughts and provide overall guidance/feedback ú Scheduled for 3: 45 pm Most useful feedback is through questions and discussion! DGC Rev, 8 Dec 04 R. M. Murray, Caltech 4