Teacher SLTs 2018 19 Leader Assistants Math assessment

Teacher SLTs 2018 -19

Leader Assistants Math assessment index for the school Goal 1: SPS Goal 2: Priority Assessment Index ELA assessment index for the school Teachers Math assessment index for my class ELA assessment index for my class

For classes that have an end of year state assessment (4 -8): Goal 1: Assessment Index for Entire Class Teacher will use the same method for setting their assessment index goal as the principal. ELA, math, science, and social studies* LDOE chart for rating scale (see next slide) Based on the performance of students in their classroom only. Use their previous year’s results to set the goal using the SPS calculator. Use Student Stats to access information. For students with no scores (home school, transfers): do not include them in your baseline goal or the final calculation to determine if you met the goal. Example: The Math Assessment Index for my classroom will increase by goal index. __ points from current index to *see next slide for an example of the process using the Rating Scale Charts.

2016 -2017 Recommended Target State Average My Class Insufficient Attainment Partial Attainment Full Attainment Exceed s SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): with grade 8 75. 2 ≤ 0. 0^ 0. 1 - 1. 8^ 1. 9 - 3. 5 > 3. 5 SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): w/out grade 8 75. 0 ≤ 0. 0^ 0. 1 - 1. 6^ 1. 7 - 3. 1 > 3. 1 Overall 69. 7 ≤ 0. 0^ 0. 1 - 1. 0^ 1. 1 - 1. 9 > 1. 9 ELA Assessment Index 76. 6 ≤ 0. 0^ 0. 1 - 3. 8 3. 9 - 7. 6 > 7. 6 Math Assessment Index* 66. 0 60 < 0. 0* 0. 1 - 4. 1 4. 2 - 8. 2 > 8. 2 Science Assessment Index 65. 3 ≤ 0. 0^ 0. 1 - 1. 8^ 1. 9 - 3. 5 > 3. 5 Social Studies Assessment Index 67. 5 ≤ 0. 0^ 0. 1 - 1. 8^ 1. 9 - 3. 5 > 3. 5 DCAI Index 131. 2 ≤ 0. 0^ 0. 1 - 2. 9 3. 0 - 5. 7 > 5. 7 Math: % of non-proficient students exceeding their target 51. 8% ≤ 0. 0^ 0. 1 - 5. 3^ 5. 4 - 10. 5 > 10. 5 ELA: % of non-proficient students exceeding their target 51. 8% ≤ 0. 0^ 0. 1 - 2. 2^ 2. 3 - 4. 3 > 4. 3 For C Schools Student Achievement Data Component Assessment Index Dropout/Credit Progress Points SLT: The Math Assessment Index for my classroom will increase by 4. 2 points from 60 to 64. 2. Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: The index did not increase. The index increased from 0. 1 – 4. 1 points. The index increased from 4. 2 – 8. 2 points. The index increased more than 8. 2 points. This is the number you get from the calculator. The goal is the bottom of Full Attainment.

Grade 3 and HS EOC/LEAP 2025 Courses with a state test but without a corresponding previous year’s test. Compute a baseline assessment index for the course: Option 1: Use the teacher’s 17 -18 EOC/LEAP 2025 results to compute a baseline assessment index. Option 2: Use the school’s 17 -18 EOC/LEAP 2025 assessment index as their baseline assessment index. Or Use the District Average Method (explain in upcoming slides)

Adjustments This is for 3 rd grade or HS courses using an assessment index baseline that is not derived from the students currently in their class. Based on the composition of the class in relation to the rest of the classes at the school – below or above – the principal can adjust the baseline assessment index accordingly. The adjustment should be based on the LDOE charts. For example… If the school is a C and the class is an advanced class, then the baseline assessment index used could be the B assessment index in that subject. If the school is a C and the class is significantly lower, then the baseline assessment index used could be the D assessment index in that subject. C School Overall ELA Assessment Index State Average 69. 7 76. 6 Math Assessment Index* 66. 0 Science Assessment Index 65. 3 Social Studies Assessment Index 67. 5 B School Overall Assessment Index State Average 85. 8 ELA Assessment Index 91. 6 Math Assessment Index* 82. 4 Science Assessment Index Social Studies Assessment Index 83. 6 83. 0

District Average Method For classes without a State Test and using a District-wide Common Assessment: Pre-K-2 (3*) ELA and math, EOC* and non -EOC tested HS core subjects 1 nd 2 The percent of students scoring proficient in my 2 grade math classes on the appropriate grade-level District-wide End of Year math assessment 3 will be at the District Average (DAVG)4. 1 however 2 proficient is defined: (Basic or above, Good or Excellent (only English III), 80% or higher, etc. ) grade and subject you teach whatever District-wide End of Year test is given for the grade and subject. See district chart for list of assessments. 3 this will be determined at the end of the year – there will be variance by grade of school – see upcoming slide. 4 *This can also be used for 3 rd grade or EOC courses using the State test because there is not comparable data from the year before. ** This example is for a C School

Goal Differentiation Based on School Letter Grade School letter grade: Goal would be… Written as… A Schools 20% higher than the district average* DAVG+20 B Schools 10% higher than the district average** DAVG+10 C Schools District Average DAVG D Schools 10% lower than the district average DAVG-10 Schools will use their current SPS school score Letter Grade to set SLTs. * “A” schools will write their goals to meet Mastery or above. **When the district average is greater than 70%, the top ranges will split the difference between that number and 100. Use this chart to make adjustments based on class composition when using the District Average to set the goal. Goals can be moved up or down using increments of 5%.

Examples of Target Statements – 2 nd grade ELA A Schools The percent of students scoring Mastery or higher in my 2 nd grade ELA class on the District End of Year ELA assessment will be 20% above the District Average (DAVG+20). B Schools The percent of students scoring Basic and above in my 2 nd grade ELA class on the District End of Year ELA assessment will be 10% above the District Average (DAVG+10). C Schools The percent of students scoring Basic and above in my 2 nd grade ELA class on the District End of Year ELA assessment will be at the District Average (DAVG). D Schools The percent of students scoring Basic and above in my 2 nd grade ELA class on the District End of Year ELA assessment will be 10% below the District Average (DAVG 10).

Examples of Target Statements – LEAP 2025 English I – using District Average Method A Schools The percent of students scoring Mastery or higher in my English 1 classes on the LEAP 2025 English I test will be 20% above the District Average (DAVG+20). B Schools The percent of students scoring Basic and above in my English 1 classes on the LEAP 2025 English I test will be 10% above the District Average (DAVG+10). C Schools The percent of students scoring Basic and above in my English 1 classes on the LEAP 2025 English I test will be at the District Average (DAVG). D Schools The percent of students scoring Basic and above in my English 1 classes on the LEAP 2025 English I test will be 10% below the District Average (DAVG-10).

Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – C School Target Statement (based on full attainment) The percent of students scoring proficient in my 2 nd grade math classes on the appropriate gradelevel District-wide End of Year math assessment will be at the District Average (DAVG). Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: More than 15% below the target. Up to 15% below the target. DAVG to 15% above the target. More than 15% above target. Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – B School Target Statement (based on full attainment) The percent of students scoring proficient in my 2 nd grade math classes on the appropriate grade-level District-wide End of Year math assessment will be 10% above the District Average (DAVG+10). Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: More than 15% below the target. Up to 15% below the target. DAVG+10 to 15%* above the target. More than 15%* above target. *If the DAVG is greater than 70% this % will be the difference between the district average+10% and 100% divided by 2.

Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – D School Target Statement (based on full attainment) The percent of students scoring proficient in my 2 nd grade math classes on the appropriate gradelevel District-wide End of Year math assessment will be 10% below the District Average (DAVG-10). Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: More than 15% below the target. Up to 15% below the target. DAVG-10 to 15% above the target. More than 15% above target. Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – A School Target Statement (based on full attainment) The percent of students scoring Mastery in my 2 nd grade math classes on the appropriate grade-level District-wide End of Year math assessment will be 20% above the District Average (DAVG+20). Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: More than 15% below the target. Up to 15% below the target. DAVG+20 to 99% score proficient. 100% of students score proficient.

Goal 2 For teachers who teach more than one core subject tested by the state: Assessment index for other core subject: ELA, math, science, social studies (5 -8). For teachers who only teach one core subject tested by the state: Set a goal for student growth or for students below proficient – depending on available of growth data. Format on next slides.

Student Growth Goal 50% of students in my 8 th grade math classes 1 will meet their expected growth target on the 8 th grade math LEAP test. 1 Should include all of the sections of that subject that you teach. Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: Less than 35% meet their expected growth target. 35% - 49% meet their expected growth target. 50% - 65% meet expected growth target. More than 65% meet expected growth target.

Pre-K ELA: District Pre-K ELA Assessment The percent of students scoring Average or above (36+) in my Pre-Kindergarten class on the District Pre-K ELA Assessment will be at the District Average (DAVG). Math: District Pre-K Math Assessment The percent of students scoring Average and above (27+) in my Pre. Kindergarten class on the District Pre-K Math Assessment will be at the District Average (DAVG).

SLT Example without a State or District End of Year test The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th grade Physical Education class 2 on the end of year assessment 3 will be 80%4. 80% of the students in my physical education class will score proficient on the end of the year assessment. 1 however 2 proficient is defined: (Basic or above, Good or Excellent (only English III), 80% or higher, etc. ) grade and subject you teach Whatever end of year assessment is appropriate for the class. If there is a national, state college, certification or district test available, that test should be used. 3 General definition of proficiency. This may vary based on school letter grade, historical data, and baseline data. 4 ** This example is for a C School

Number of SLTs Principals may want to consider having their teachers write more than two goals in order to cover all of the tested subjects they teach or to include school-wide initiatives. The results are averaged for a final rating.

Suggested Scale for other non-tested grades and subjects Percent of students who score “proficient” D or F schools: 70% C schools: 80% B schools: 90% A schools: 100% *based on the idea that A schools are expected to have 100% of their students proficient. Adjustments can be made based on academic and non-academic courses and baseline data. When there are no proficiency levels assigned, proficient will be defined as 80% or higher.

Timeline November 6 th: SLT's discussed November 16 th: SLT's posted and accepted in CIS by evaluators

Resources District SLT website (C&I Webpage): http: //www. tangischools. org//site/Default. aspx? Page. ID=17531