Teacher Evaluation Process 2018 2019 School Year Created

Teacher Evaluation Process 2018 -2019 School Year Created and Approved by MCUSD#2 PERA Joint Committee August 2018

Initial Evaluation Meeting (August) • Detailed review of teacher evaluation framework, including required components • Explanation of jointly selected component process • Review of student growth procedures

Overview of Steps Step 1 • Pre-Conference Step 2 Student Growth Steps are in BLUE • Pre -Assessments Step 3 • Formal Observation Step 4 • Conduct Midpoint Checks Step 5 • Post-Observation Conference Step 6 • Midpoint Check Conference(s) Step 7 • Informal Observation(s) Step 8 • Post-Observation Conference(s) Step 9 • Post Assessments Step 10 • Final Growth Target Meeting Step 11 • Summative Evaluation Conference

Domain 1 - Planning and Preparation (15%) Step 1 – Pre-Conference Pre-conference • Discuss any questions related to the teacher evaluation framework • Jointly select components • Set date formal observation/discuss formal observation • Discuss and select two assessments for student growth (see Teacher. Share drive) • Discuss dates to conduct/administer midpoint and end checks 2 Required, 1 Jointly Selected Component 1 a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline, Knowledge of content-related best practice 1 b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students Knowledge of child and adolescent development, knowledge of the learning process, knowledge of students’ skills, knowledge, and language proficiency, knowledge of students’ interests, knowledge of students’ special needs or backgrounds 1 c: Setting Instructional Outcomes Value, sequence, and alignment, Clarity, Balance, Suitability for diverse learners 1 d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources for classroom use, Resources for students 1 e: Designing Coherent Instruction Learning activities, Instructional materials and resources, Lesson and unit structure, Instructional groups 1 f: Designing Student Assessments Design of formative assessment, Use for planning, Congruence with instructional outcomes, Criteria and standards Total Score ___/12 Possible Points = ____ x 0. 15 = _____ Domain 2 – Classroom Environment (35%) Domain 3 – Instruction (40%) 1 Required, 1 Jointly Selected Component 4 a: Reflecting on Teaching Accuracy, Use in future teaching 4 b: Maintaining Accurate Records Student completion of assignments, Non-instructional records, Student progress in learning 4 c: Communicating with Families Information about the instructional program, Information about individual students, Engagement of families in the instructional program 4 d: Participating in a Professional Community Relationships with colleagues, Involvement in a culture of professional inquiry, Service to the school, Participation in school and district projects 4 e: Growing and Developing Professionally Enhancement of content knowledge and pedagogical skills, Receptivity to feedback from colleagues, Service to the profession 4 f: Showing Professionalism Service to students, Advocacy, Compliance with school and district regulations Total Score ___/8 Possible Points = ____ x 0. 10 = _____ 2 a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Teacher interaction with students, Student interactions with other students 2 b: Establishing a Culture for Learning Importance of the content, Student pride in work, Expectations for learning and achievement 2 c: Management of Transitions Management of materials and supplies, Performance of non-instructional duties 2 d: Managing Student Behavior Expectations, Monitoring of student behavior, Response to student misbehavior 2 e: Organizing Physical Space Safety and accessibility, Arrangement of furniture and use of physical resources Total Score ___/12 Possible Points = ____ x 0. 35 = _____ Domain 4 – Professional Responsibilities (10%) 2 Required, 1 Jointly Selected Component 3 Required, 1 Jointly Selected Component 3 a: Communicating with Students Expectations for learning, Explanations of content, Directions and procedures, Use of oral and written language 3 b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Quality of questions, Discussion techniques, Student participation 3 c: Engaging Students in Learning Activities and assignments. Instructional materials and resources, Grouping of students, Structure and pacing 3 d: Using Assessment in Instruction Assessment criteria, Monitoring of student learning, Feedback to students, Student self-assessment and monitoring of progress 3 e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness Lesson adjustment, Response to students, Persistence Total Score ___/16 Possible Points = ____ x 0. 40 = _____

Step 2: Pre-Assessments Pre-assessments • Administer (two assessments) • Score • Set initial growth targets Student Growth Target Data Collection: Assessment 1 Teacher Name: History Buff School: Class: World Cultures Per. 3 Assessment Name: Conflict in the Middle East Mid-point Check Adjusted Growth Target Final Score Meets Target? (Y=1 N=0) 1 Anna 2 Bob 3 Chris 4 Dwight 5 Eleanor 6 Felix 7 George 8 Hannah 9 Katie 10 Lauren 11 Mia 12 Nora 13 Phillip 14 Oscar 15 Rhea 16 Shawn 17 Tia 18 Trina 19 Will 20 Xavier 21 Zeke 22 Andy 23 Becky 24 Charley 25 Donna Student Name # of Students MHS Pretest Score Growth Target 25 Data for student growth component # Meets Target # of Students in Class

Step 3: Formal Observation (Focus on Teacher Performance) • Reflect/prepare for post observation conference

Step 4: Conduct Midpoint Checks Student Growth Target Data Collection: Assessment 1 Conduct Midpoint checks (may or may not be completed prior to Step 5) Teacher Name: History Buff School: Class: World Cultures Per. 3 Assessment Name: Student Name • Record scores • Consider adjustments to targets # of Students MHS Conflict in the Middle East Growth Target Pretest Score Mid-point Adjusted Final Score Check Growth Target Exceeds/Meets Target? (Y=1 N=0) 1 Anna 15 52 48 52 2 Bob 25 55 40 55 3 Chris 29 65 60 65 4 Dwight 36 65 55 65 5 Eleanor 36 65 55 65 6 Felix 45 75 65 75 7 George 48 75 50 65 8 Hannah 49 75 65 75 9 Katie 50 80 85 90 10 Lauren 55 80 70 80 11 Mia 55 80 75 85 12 Nora 59 80 75 80 13 Phillip 71 90 80 90 14 Oscar 72 90 85 90 15 Rhea 75 90 80 90 16 Shawn 80 92 90 95 17 Tia 18 52 45 60 18 Trina 70 90 90 90 19 Will 41 65 55 65 20 Xavier 32 65 70 80 21 Zeke 36 65 55 65 22 Andy 36 65 60 65 23 Becky 48 75 65 75 24 Charley 49 75 60 80 25 Donna 55 80 25 Data for student growth component # M/E Target # of Students in Class 0 25

Step 5: Post-Observation Conference Post-observation Conference • • Within 15 school days of observation Discuss lesson-feedback Discuss midpoint checks, if completed Discuss adjusted targets, if necessary

Step 6: Midpoint Check Conference(s) Midpoint check meeting (if not completed during post-conference) • Share midpoint scores • Share recommended adjustments (If any) Student Growth Target Data Collection: Assessment 1 Teacher Name: History Buff School: Class: World Cultures Per. 3 Assessment Name: Student Name # of Students MHS Conflict in the Middle East Mid. Adjusted Final point Growth Score Check Target Growth Target Pretest Score Meets Target? (Y=1 N=0) 1 Anna 15 52 48 52 2 Bob 25 55 40 55 3 Chris 29 65 60 65 4 Dwight 36 65 55 65 5 Eleanor 36 65 55 65 6 Felix 45 75 65 75 7 George 48 75 50 65 8 Hannah 49 75 65 75 9 Katie 50 80 85 90 10 Lauren 55 80 70 80 11 Mia 55 80 75 85 12 Nora 59 80 75 80 13 Phillip 71 90 80 90 14 Oscar 72 90 85 90 15 Rhea 75 90 80 90 16 Shawn 80 92 90 95 17 Tia 18 52 45 60 18 Trina 70 90 90 90 19 Will 41 65 55 65 20 Xavier 32 65 70 80 21 Zeke 36 65 55 65 22 Andy 36 65 60 65 23 Becky 48 75 65 75 24 Charley 49 75 60 80 25 Donna 55 80 25 Data for student growth component

Step 7: Informal Observation(s) • Reflect/prepare for post

Step 8: Post-Observation Conference(s) Post-observation conference(s) • Within 15 school days of observation • Discuss lesson • What other evidence do we still need?

Step 9: Post-Assessments Conduct Post-Assessment (two times) Student Growth Target Data Collection: Assessment 1 Teacher Name: History Buff School: Class: World Cultures Per. 3 Assessment Name: Student Name • Administer tests • Score • Complete Student Growth Target Data # of Students MHS Pretest Score Conflict in the Middle East Midpoint Check Growth Target Adjusted Growth Target Final Score Exceeds/Meets Target? (Y=1 N=0) 1 Anna 15 52 48 52 54 1 2 Bob 25 55 40 55 55 1 3 Chris 29 65 60 65 66 1 4 Dwight 36 65 55 65 71 1 5 Eleanor 36 65 55 65 66 1 6 Felix 45 75 65 75 70 0 7 George 48 75 50 65 60 0 8 Hannah 49 75 65 75 76 1 9 Katie 50 80 85 90 75 0 10 Lauren 55 80 70 80 78 0 11 Mia 55 80 75 85 74 0 12 Nora 59 80 75 80 84 1 13 Phillip 71 90 80 90 91 1 14 Oscar 72 90 85 90 92 1 15 Rhea 75 90 80 90 90 1 16 Shawn 80 92 90 95 97 1 17 Tia 18 52 45 60 67 1 18 Trina 70 90 90 90 81 0 19 Will 41 65 55 65 68 1 20 Xavier 32 65 70 80 88 1 21 Zeke 36 65 55 65 65 1 22 Andy 36 65 60 65 70 1 23 Becky 48 75 65 75 73 0 24 Charley 49 75 60 80 82 1 25 Donna 55 80 75 0 25 Data for student growth component # M/E Target 17 # of Students in Class 25

Step 10: Final Growth Target Meeting Student Growth Target Data Collection: Assessment 1 Teacher Name: History Buff School: Class: World Cultures Per. 3 Assessment Name: Student Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Final Growth Target Meeting • Review student growth target data • Calculate scores of two assessments # of Students Student Growth Excellent Proficient Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory Percentage of Students 85% 68% 50% < 49% Range for Ratings 3. 4 2. 7 2 0 Student growth sample Assessment #1 (Ex. World Cultures Per. 3) Assessment #2 (Ex. World Cultures Per. 6) Column Total Student Growth (30%) Number of students 25 20 45 2. 8 Number of students meeting 17 15 32 4 3. 3 2. 6 1. 9 Percentage of Percent Multiplied Students by 4 (to arrive at the Demonstrating range) Growth 71. 11% 2. 8 Anna Bob Chris Dwight Eleanor Felix George Hannah Katie Lauren Mia Nora Phillip Oscar Rhea Shawn Tia Trina Will Xavier Zeke Andy Becky Charley Donna 25 MHS Pretest Score 15 25 29 36 36 45 48 49 50 55 55 59 71 72 75 80 18 70 41 32 36 36 48 49 55 Growth Target 52 55 65 65 65 75 75 75 80 80 90 90 90 92 52 90 65 65 75 75 80 Conflict in the Middle East Mid. Adjusted Final Exceeds/Meets point Growth Score Target? (Y=1 N=0) Check Target 48 52 54 1 40 55 55 1 60 65 66 1 55 65 71 1 55 65 66 1 65 75 70 0 50 65 60 0 65 75 76 1 85 90 75 0 70 80 78 0 75 85 74 0 75 80 84 1 80 90 91 1 85 90 92 1 80 90 90 1 90 95 97 1 45 60 67 1 90 90 81 0 55 65 68 1 70 80 88 1 55 65 65 1 60 65 70 1 65 75 73 0 60 80 82 1 80 75 0 Data for student growth component # M/E Target 17 # of Students in Class 25

Step 11: Summative Evaluation Conference