Taskbased testing aneb zkoume zkouet jinak Lenka Zouhar
Task-based testing aneb zkoušíme zkoušet jinak Lenka Zouhar Ludvíková Kateřina Svídová Martina Šindelářová Skupeňová 1
naši studenti § prezenční studium § magisterský studijní program § absolventi kurzu CJVA 2 B (zkouška na B 2) nebo bakaláři z jiných univerzit (bez zkoušky B 2) § 3 seminární skupiny / semestr § desítky oborů a kateder 2
minimální jazyková kompetence Bc. studium B 2 Mgr. studium B 2+ Ph. D. studium C 1 3
CJVA 2 B vs. CJVA 2 M Bc. - standardizované zkoušení napříč jazyky a fakultami - B 2 podle SERR - angličtina pro akademické účely listening 15% reading 20% gramlex 20% writing 20% speaking 25% 4
CJVA 2 B vs. CJVA 2 M Mgr. - task-based testing, standardizované zkoušení napříč 3 sem. skupinami - angličtina pro akademické a odborné účely listening 15% reading 16% gramlex 23% writing 21% speaking 25% 5
CJVA 2 B vs. CJVA 2 M Bc. - standardizované testování napříč jazyky a fakultami - B 2 podle SERR - angličtina pro akademické účely Mgr. - task-based testing, standardizované zkoušení napříč 3 sem. skupinami - angličtina pro akademické a odborné účely listening 15% reading 20% reading 16% gramlex 20% gramlex 23% writing 20% writing 21% speaking 25% 6
CJVA 2 M - záměr § mezistupeň mezi B 2 a C 1 § mezistupeň mezi Bc. a Ph. D. studiem § zacílení na odbornost studentů - materiály - slovní zásoba - témata (i u zkoušky) 7
CJVA 2 M - outline § § § intro + formal / informal language notetaking presenting critical reading paraphrasing comparing / contrasting argumentation abstract / summary referencing and referring visuals exam preparation – round table simulation 8
100% 24 39 presentation abstract round table essay pilotáž JS 2017 29 8 37 listening 15% 0 11 4 0 reading 16% 3 10 3 0 gramlex 23% 8 3 8 4 writing 21% 13 2 2 4 speaking 25% 0 13 12 0 9
100% 24 poster presentation abstract round table essay facelift PS 2017 29 8 37 39 listening 15% 0 11 4 0 reading 16% 3 10 3 0 gramlex 23% 8 3 8 4 writing 21% 13 2 2 4 speaking 25% 0 13 12 0 10
zkouška v praxi § komparativní esej 500 – 650 slov § round table 90 minut (+příprava) výběr ze 3 témat (reading kit a poslech k tématu) ART, EDUCATION, LANGUAGE § poster presentation § abstrakt prezentace Definujte zápatí - název prezentace / pracoviště 5 minut + diskuze 100 – 150 slov 11
poster presentation (29) components? skills? points? 12
poster presentation (29) components poster preparation presenting interaction skills points reading 3 preparing visuals 3 writing 4 body language 2 monologue –speaking, organization 8 author reacting to others – listening and speaking 5 audience –listening and speaking 4 13
component skills interaction author reacting expectations points 2 -1 -0 1 audience 1 1 14
component skills expectations points interaction referring to what other people say, commenting 2 -1 -0 answering, responding promptly 2 -1 -0 politenesss 1 gramlex range and accuracy asking questions about the keywords (reading) 1 asking about information (listening) commenting to the point (reading and listening) 1 author reacting audience 1 1 15
component skills poster preparation reading? reading +writing preparing visuals? writing? expectations penalization topic appropriate for a poster, specific enough relevant source selection (academic, in English, reliable) bibliography in appr. form logical structure graphic layout (clear, simple) title development coherence + cohesion spelling grammar vocabulary 16
component skills poster preparation reading? reading +writing preparing visuals? writing? expectations penalization topic appropriate for a poster, specific enough relevant source selection (academic, in English, reliable) bibliography in appr. form unclear / misleading / illogical / logical structure chaotic structure graphic layout (clear, inconsistent fonts, messy / chaotic simple) layout not reflecting the content, too short / title development long coherence + cohesion spelling grammar 17 vocabulary
criteria task esej (24) a abstrakt (8) component criteria task organization component organization grammar + vocabulary grammar vocabulary 18
criteria task esej (24) a abstrakt (8) component Your poster presentation score includes an abstract of 100 – 150 words handed in on the day of the presentation in a printed form. criteria task organization component organization grammar + vocabulary grammar vocabulary The comparative essay should demonstrate your ability to produce a written text in your field of study. The wordcount should be between 500 and 650 words, longer or shorter assignments will be penalised. We believe in your academic integrity, therefore 19 any attempts to cheat will be penalised.
criteria task organization grammar vocabulary component genre topic length title sources evidence presentation coverage originality&creativity visual structure introduction topic sentence main body fluency conclusion succinctness transition sentence complexity consistency accuracy register conciseness authenticity register spelling esej (24) a abstrakt (8) criteria task component genre word limit organization title structure coherence/cohesion grammar + vocabulary register, vocabulary range and accuracy grammar range and accuracy spelling 20
abstrakt (8) criteria component task genre word limit title structure coherence / organization cohesion register, vocabulary range and accuracy grammar range and accuracy language spelling expectations provides a succinct description of the topic, relevance, and purpose of student's presentation 100 - 150 words, zero tolerance relevant and engaging title opening and closing sentences which manage audience/reader expectations reader-friendly, a "red thread"; transition words/phrases, signposting, the "glue" penalizations abstract only a summary of the topic without reference to relevance/purpose of pres. too short or too long no title or title-topic mismatch no opening/closing, or opening/closing too abrupt no transition words; reader not guided from one point to next low frequency of academic vocabulary; language appropriate for an academic obtrusive repetition; misleading word abstract, use of topical terminology, choice, colloquial or "spoken" language; precise word choice slang use of complex structures and correct no compound sentences; mistakes that use impede understanding any spelling mistakes (i. e. not spellchecked and reread/revised before correct, zero tolerance submission) 21
esej (24) splnění úkolu genre comparison/contrast essay topic on topic (selected from your own study discipline) length 500 -650 words title concise & relevant title sources at least 2 relevant sources (at least 1 English); proper citation details evidence presentation accurate presentation of evidence coverage topic covered in depth originality&creativity original/creative thought 22
esej (24) splnění úkolu genre comparison/contrast essay different genre (narrative, descriptive …) topic on topic (selected from your own study discipline) off topic length 500 -650 words considerably longer/shorter (+/- 50 words) title concise & relevant title no/misleading title; too broad (rather topic than title) sources at least 2 relevant sources (at least no or just 1 relevant reference; no English 1 English); proper citation details references; missing citation details evidence presentation accurate presentation of evidence inaccurate presentation of evidence coverage shallow presentation of facts topic covered in depth originality&creativity original/creative thought neither original nor creative thought 23
esej (24) organizace visual structure no paragraphs; illogical division of text introduction no/poor introduction topic sentences missing improper ratio to the introduction and conclusion (too short) main body fluency conclusion succinctness transition chaotic parts/text no conclusion; summary instead; illogical/incorrect conclusion recycling ideas in length no transitions; transition words used incorrectly 24
esej (24) organizace visual structure no paragraphs; illogical division of text introduction logical division into paragraphs introduction providing background information topic sentence in each paragraph main body fluency appropriate length (cca 2/3 of text) text easy and pleasant to read; no need to reread any part to understand the writer´s intention topic sentences missing improper ratio to the introduction and conclusion (too short) conclusion reinforcing the main idea chaotic parts/text no conclusion; summary instead; illogical/incorrect conclusion succinctness economic writing/writing concisely appropriate and sufficient use of transition words/expressions recycling ideas in length no transitions; transition words used incorrectly transition no/poor introduction 25
language esej (24) grammar sentence complexity consistency accuracy register vocabulary conciseness accuracy register spelling 26
esej (24) language grammar sentence complexity complex sentences too short sentences consistency consistent use of grammar inconsistent use of grammar correct use of grammar mistakes impeding understanding (e. g. wrong word order, prepositions …) formal, appropriate for academic style informal style (e. g. It has got, it is gonna, contractions…) conciseness effective, precise use of words adding words just to lengthen the essay; no use of synonyms accuracy use of words and expressions that sound English false friends; Cze. English expressions; wrong collocations, wordform. register academic/formal register informal style; slang; shortened words correct spelling obtrusive spelling mistakes; more than 2 spelling mistakes accuracy register vocabulary spelling 27
diskuse (39) poslech 11 čtení 10 gramlex 3 psaní 2 mluvení 13 Definujte zápatí - název prezentace / pracoviště 28
skill reading diskuse (39) component 6 tasks summary reading + writing key words question formation listening (video) 4 questions key words speaking referring to the sources pronunciation fluency coherence, cohesion reasoning, argumentation to the topic interaction reacting to others holding / sharing the floor body language hedging gramlex grammar vocabulary register Definujte zápatí - název prezentace / pracoviště 6– 5– 4– 3– 2 -1 -0 2 -1 -0 2 -1 -0 2 -1 -0 1 -0 29
diskuse (39) https: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=Sip. ZT 1 VDYus Definujte zápatí - název prezentace / pracoviště 30
skill reading diskuse (39) component 6 tasks summary reading + writing key words question formation listening (video) 4 questions key words speaking referring to the sources pronunciation fluency coherence, cohesion reasoning, argumentation to the topic interaction reacting to others holding / sharing the floor body language hedging gramlex grammar vocabulary register Definujte zápatí - název prezentace / pracoviště 6– 5– 4– 3– 2 -1 -0 2 -1 -0 2 -1 -0 2 -1 -0 1 -0 31
aktuální otázky - zpětná vazba od studentů jasnost kritérií B 2+ deskriptory časová zátěž moderace ? ? ? https: //docs. google. com/forms/d/1 kps. Emp. AMq. Zb 5 SBHIJpx 7 qf 08 D_H 83 Mmln. FAiu_2 Ks. R 8/edit#responses http: //www. phil. muni. cz/wff/home/Pictures/carla/vizualizace/Vizualizace_0001 a. jpg/view 32
Děkujeme… http: //www. phil. muni. cz/wff/home/Pictures/carla/vizualizace/Vizualizace_0001 a. jpg/view 33
- Slides: 33