TAKE OUT YOUR PROFILE GRAB AN INDEX CARD

TAKE OUT YOUR PROFILE • GRAB AN INDEX CARD.

BILL OF RIGHTS • FIRST TEN AMENDMENTS TO THE U. S. CONSTITUTION • OUTLINES SPECIFIC LIMITS TO GOVERNMENT • FOURTH AMENDMENT- PROTECTION FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES • ADOPTED IN 1791 • • NO WARRANTS FOR A S & S CAN BE ISSUED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE FIFTH AMENDMENT- NO ONE CAN BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW • • PROHIBITS SOMEONE FROM BEING TRIED FOR THE SAME CRIME TWICE (DOUBLE JEOPARDY) NO PERSON CAN BE REQUIRED TO BE A WITNESS AGAINST ((INCRIMINATE) HIMSELF OR HERSELF • SIXTH AMENDMENT- GUARANTEES A SPEEDY TRIAL, A TRIAL BY JURY, A PUBLIC TRIAL, THE RIGHT TO CONFRONT WITNESSES, AND THE RIGHT TO A LAWYER IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS • EIGHTH AMENDMENT - PROHIBITS EXCESSIVE BAILS AND FINES, AND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS

TH 4 AMENDMENT • FOURTH AMENDMENT- PROTECTION FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES • NO WARRANTS FOR A S & S CAN BE ISSUED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE

WHAT IS A SEARCH? ANY GOVERNMENTAL INTRUSION INTO SOMETHING IN WHICH A PERSON HAS “A REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY. ” (HOME, GARAGE, DIARY, MAIL, BRIEFCASE) KATZ V. U. S. (1967)

WHAT IS A SEIZURE? • POSSESSION, CUSTODY OR CONTROL OF PROPERTY OR PEOPLE (I. E. AN ARREST)

NO REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY: • IN PLACES OR THINGS THAT ARE: • IN PLAIN VIEW • IN OPEN FIELDS AWAY FROM RESIDENCE • ABANDONED PROPERTY

WHAT IS A WARRANT? • COURT ORDER SIGNED BY A JUDGE AUTHORIZING A SEARCH, ARREST, OR SEIZURE OF EVIDENCE. SPECIFICALLY REQUIRES AN AFFIDAVIT (SWORN STATEMENT OF FACTS & CIRCUMSTANCES) THAT DESCRIBES PERSON, PLACE AND OBJECT OF SEARCH OR SEIZURE.

E R U D E C O POLICE PR E R U IZ E S & H C R A E S : T N E M FOURTH AMEND

WHAT IS PROBABLE CAUSE? • EVIDENCE MUST BE STRONG ENOUGH THAT AN INDEPENDENT, CAUTIOUS PERSON WOULD HAVE GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE IT

WHEN A WARRANT IS NOT REQUIRED: • TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF POLICE OFFICERS AND THE PUBLIC • TO ENSURE THAT EVIDENCE WILL BE SEIZED BEFORE IT CAN BE HIDDEN OR DESTROYED (KNOCK, ANNOUNCE, ENTER) • TO HELP APPREHEND SUSPECTS OR PREVENT THEIR ESCAPE

EXCEPTIONS TO WARRANT REQUIREMENT • MOTOR VEHICLE SEARCHES —PROBABLE CAUSE OF CONTRABAND OR EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY • SEARCHES INCIDENT TO LAWFUL ARREST—AREA WITHIN SUSPECT’S “IMMEDIATE CONTROL” TO CONFISCATE WEAPONS OR EVIDENCE THAT COULD BE DESTROYED. • STOP AND FRISK—”REASONABLE SUSPICION IN LIGHT OF EXPERIENCE”; UNUSUAL CONDUCT • CONSENT—VOLUNTARILY AND KNOWINGLY CONSENT. PARENTS CAN GIVE CONSENT FOR CHILD, ROOMMATE CANNOT GIVE CONSENT FOR OTHERS IN HOUSE • HOT PURSUIT—PROBABLE CAUSE THAT CRIME WAS COMMITTED, POLICE CAN PURSUE AND SEARCH BUILDING ENTERED BY SUSPECT

MORE EXCEPTIONS • EMERGENCY SITUATIONS—POLICE CAN ENTER IF THEY HEAR SCREAMING, FIGHTING, CALLS FOR HELP • TRAVEL SAFETY • AIRLINE SEARCHES—ALLOWED FOR BAGS, METAL DETECTORS, PAT-DOWNS, DOG SNIFFING, X-RAYS • BORDER SEARCHES—AT OR ALONG AREAS NEAR INTERNATIONAL BORDERS • CUSTOMS SEARCHES—BY AGENTS AT BORDERS, PORTS, AND AIRPORTS

HOW ABOUT IN A SCHOOL?

EXCLUSIONARY RULE • ANY EVIDENCE THAT IS OBTAINED IN VIOLATION OF THE ACCUSED’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH, FIFTH, OR SIXTH AMENDMENTS, AS WELL AS ANY EVIDENCE DERIVED FROM ILLEGALLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE WILL NOT BE ADMISSIBLE IN CRIMINAL COURT. • IF EVIDENCE IS NOT COLLECTED LAWFULLY THAN EVEN IF IT IS INCRIMINATING IT CANNOT BE USED.

FRUIT OF THE POISONED TREE • FRUIT OF THE POISONED TREE- ILLEGALLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE THAT CAN NOT BE USED IN COURT.

BILL OF RIGHTS • FIRST TEN AMENDMENTS TO THE U. S. CONSTITUTION • OUTLINES SPECIFIC LIMITS TO GOVERNMENT • FOURTH AMENDMENT- PROTECTION FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES • ADOPTED IN 1791 • • NO WARRANTS FOR A S & S CAN BE ISSUED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE FIFTH AMENDMENT- NO ONE CAN BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW • • PROHIBITS SOMEONE FROM BEING TRIED FOR THE SAME CRIME TWICE (DOUBLE JEOPARDY) NO PERSON CAN BE REQUIRED TO BE A WITNESS AGAINST ((INCRIMINATE) HIMSELF OR HERSELF • SIXTH AMENDMENT- GUARANTEES A SPEEDY TRIAL, A TRIAL BY JURY, A PUBLIC TRIAL, THE RIGHT TO CONFRONT WITNESSES, AND THE RIGHT TO A LAWYER IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS • EIGHTH AMENDMENT - PROHIBITS EXCESSIVE BAILS AND FINES, AND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS

THE TH 5 AMENDMENT TEXT: “NO PERSON…SHALL BE COMPELLED IN ANY CRIMINAL CASE TO BE A WITNESS AGAINST HIMSELF. ” BASICALLY, THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE NOT TO TESTIFY AGAINST THEMSELVES.

INTERROGATION • OBJECTIVES: • KNOW YOUR RIGHTS WHEN POLICE HAVE TAKEN YOU INTO CUSTODY. • KNOW HOW TO INVOKE THOSE RIGHTS WHEN IN POLICE CUSTODY.

WHEN DO MIRANDA RIGHTS APPLY? CUSTODIAL POLICE INTERROGATION

MIRANDA RIGHTS • “EXTRA-TEXTUAL” PROTECTION: RIGHTS MADE BY THE SUPREME COURT, NOT IN THE ACTUAL TEXT OF THE CONSTITUTION • RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT • RIGHT TO A LAWYER

MIRANDA RIGHTS IMPORTANT THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW!

WHAT IS CUSTODY? • WHERE A REASONABLE PERSON WOULD NOT FEEL FREE TO LEAVE • NOT JUST AN ARREST • IF YOU VOLUNTARILY GO TO THE POLICE STATION, IT IS NOT CUSTODY

WHAT IS INTERROGATION? DIRECTION QUESTIONING OR INTERACTION THAT IS REASONABLY EXPECTED TO GET A RESPONSE

AFTER INVOKING YOUR RIGHTS YOUR ACTIONS OR WORDS CAN STILL BE CONSIDERED A WAIVER - IF YOU ASK SOMETHING LIKE, “WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO ME? ” THIS WILL WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT - BUT BASIC CONVERSATION DOES NOT COUNT – YOU CAN ASK FOR WATER, ETC.

OTHER IMPORTANT THINGS TO KNOW • EXERCISING YOUR RIGHTS CANNOT BE USED AGAINST YOU • PHYSICAL EVIDENCE THE POLICE FIND CAN STILL BE USED AGAINST YOU, EVEN IF THEY FAIL TO READ YOUR RIGHTS • POLICE CAN USE TRICKERY – THEY JUST CAN’T “OVERBEAR PERSONAL WILL”

INTERROGATION • ELON JAMES WHITE EXPLAINS WHAT TO DO IF YOU’RE STOPPED BY THE POLICE.

• THE CENTRAL PARK 5 WHY DID THEY CONFESS TO THE RAPE AND BEATING? WHY DIDN’T ANYONE SPEAK OUT? • • CONFORMITY, OBEDIENCE, AND THE POWER OF SITUATIONS WHAT COULD THEY HAVE DONE TO PROTECT THEMSELVES? MIRANDA RIGHTS • INVOKE 5 TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS • • • RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY USE OF FORCE • • • RIGHT TO NOT INCRIMINATE YOURSELF INVOKE 6 TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS • • RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT ONE OF THE BOYS WAS STRUCK BY AN OFFICER ACROSS THE FACE. WHAT LEVEL OF FORCE IS CONSIDERED REASONABLE? CAPITAL PUNISHMENT • • MANY NEW YORK RESIDENTS DEATH PENALTY DEBATE

THE IDENTIFICATION PROCESS • WITHOUT A CONFESSION THE POLICE ARE FORCED TO RELY ON OTHER METHODS TO IDENTIFY SUSPECTS • SHOW-UPS: WHEN A SUSPECT WHO MATCHES THE DESCRIPTION GIVEN BY A WITNESS IS APPREHENDED NEAR THE SCENE OF THE CRIME IN A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME AFTER THE CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED. • PHOTO-ARRAYS: WITNESSES AND VICTIMS ARE SHOWN, “MUG-SHOTS” OF PEOPLE WITH POLICE RECORDS THAT MATCH THE DESCRIPTION OF THE SUSPECT. POLICE WILL ALSO PRESENT WITNESSES AND VICTIMS WITH PEOPLE THEY BELIEVE MIGHT HAVE COMMITTED THE CRIME. • LINE-UPS: WHICH ENTAIL LINING UP SEVERAL PHYSICALLY SIMILAR PEOPLE, ONE OF WHOM IS THE SUSPECT, IN FRONT OF THE WITNESS OR VICTIM. THE POLICE MAY HAVE EACH MEMBER WEAR SIMILAR CLOTHING OR SAY A PHRASE THAT WAS USED DURING THE CRIME.

INTERROGATION • YOUR RIGHTS WHEN IN POLICE CUSTODY: • RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT. • RIGHT TO KNOW THAT ANYTHING YOU SAY CAN BE USED AGAINST YOU IN COURT. • RIGHT TO HAVE AN ATTORNEY PRESENT, EVEN IF YOU CAN’T AFFORD ONE.

INTERROGATION • WHEN DO THESE RIGHTS APPLY? • ONLY APPLY IN CUSTODY. AS IN, UNDER ARREST. NOT WHEN YOU’RE VOLUNTARILY TALKING TO POLICE.

INTERROGATION • HOW DO I INVOKE THESE RIGHTS? • LIKE ELON SAID, YOU SIMPLY SAY, “I WANT AN ATTORNEY. ” • WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU INVOKE YOUR RIGHTS? • THE POLICE MUST LEAVE YOU ALONE. Invoke: (verb) to summon into action or to bring into existence

INTERROGATION • CASE STUDIES. . • READ THE PROBLEM. • PICK CHARACTERS. • DISCUSS THE QUESTIONS. • ACTION!

INTERROGATION • GROUP ONE: THE TRAFFIC STOP

INTERROGATION • GROUP ONE: THE TRAFFIC STOP. • DID THE DRIVER HAVE A RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY? WHY OR WHY NOT? • DID THE DRIVER “INVOKE” ANY SUCH RIGHT?

INTERROGATION • ANSWERS: • NO SUCH RIGHT – NOT IN CUSTODY. • DID NOT INVOKE RIGHTS ANYWAY. • BERKEMER V. MCCARTY (1984)

INTERROGATION • GROUP TWO: THE (ALMOST) SILENT PERSON

INTERROGATION • GROUP TWO: THE (ALMOST) SILENT PRISONER • DID HE/SHE HAVE A RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT? • DID HE/SHE INVOKE THAT RIGHT? • WHAT COULD HE/SHE HAVE DONE TO STOP THE QUESTIONING?

INTERROGATION • ANSWERS: • YES, HE/SHE HAD A RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT. HE/SHE WAS IN POLICE CUSTODY. • NO, HE/SHE DID NOT INVOKE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT. YOU REALLY HAVE TO BE SILENT THROUGHOUT, OR JUST SAY, “I’M INVOKING MY RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT. ” • BERGHUIS V. THOMPKINS (2010) “Zip it. ” - Dr. Evil

INTERROGATION • GROUP THREE: THE AMBIGUOUS REQUEST

INTERROGATION • GROUP THREE: THE AMBIGUOUS REQUEST • DID THE SUSPECT INVOKE HIS RIGHT TO A LAWYER? • CAN THE SUSPECT’S CONFESSION BE USED IN TRIAL?

INTERROGATION • ANSWERS: • NO, THE PHRASE “MAYBE I SHOULD TALK TO A LAWYER, ” DID NOT INVOKE AND THE DETECTIVE DIDN’T HAVE TO CLARIFY. • YES, BECAUSE THE REQUEST WASN’T CLEAR ENOUGH, THE CONFESSION CAN BE USED AT TRIAL. • INSTEAD, THE PERSON SHOULD HAVE SAID “I WANT A LAWYER. ” • DAVIS V. UNITED STATES (1994)

INTERROGATION • SUMMARY • PEOPLE IN POLICE CUSTODY HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT AND TO HAVE A LAWYER WITH THEM DURING QUESTIONING. • BUT, A PERSON MUST CLEARLY INVOKE THOSE RIGHTS. • IF A PERSON IS NOT IN CUSTODY, IT MEANS HE/SHE IS FREE TO LEAVE (BUT ASK FIRST!).

TH THE 5 AMENDMENT

WHEN MIRANDA WARNING IS NOT REQUIRED • WHEN THE POLICE DO NOT ASK THE SUSPECT ANY QUESTIONS THAT ARE TESTIMONIAL. ROUTINE BOOKING QUESTIONS (NAME, HEIGHT, EYE COLOR) • WHEN THE POLICE HAVE NOT FOCUSED ON A SUSPECT AND ARE INTERVIEWING WITNESSES AT THE SCENE OF A CRIME. • WHEN A PERSON VOLUNTEERS INFORMATION. • WHEN A SUSPECT HAS GIVEN A PRIVATE STATEMENT TO A FRIEND OR ACQUAINTANCE. (GOV’T CANT SET UP THE SIT. ) • DURING A STOP AND FRISK. • DURING A TRAFFIC STOP.

THE “DIRTY HARRY” PROBLEM • SITUATION: • YOUNG GIRL HAS BEEN KIDNAPPED AND BURIED ALIVE. • SUSPECT DEMANDS $200, 000. • SUSPECT HAS BEEN APPREHENDED, BUT REFUSES TO REVEAL THE LOCATION OF THE GIRL. • ONLY WAY TO GET THE LOCATION OF THE GIRL IS TO BEAT IT OUT OF HIM. ETHICAL DILEMMA: Torture is forbidden. Arrest should be made and suspect should be advised of Miranda rights. SOLUTION: Are the police justified in using unlawful methods to achieve a greater good?

• THE CENTRAL PARK 5 WHY DID THEY CONFESS TO THE RAPE AND BEATING? WHY DIDN’T ANYONE SPEAK OUT? • • CONFORMITY, OBEDIENCE, AND THE POWER OF SITUATIONS WHAT COULD THEY HAVE DONE TO PROTECT THEMSELVES? MIRANDA RIGHTS • INVOKE 5 TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS • • • RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY USE OF FORCE • • • RIGHT TO NOT INCRIMINATE YOURSELF INVOKE 6 TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS • • RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT ONE OF THE BOYS WAS STRUCK BY AN OFFICER ACROSS THE FACE. WHAT LEVEL OF FORCE IS CONSIDERED REASONABLE? CAPITAL PUNISHMENT • • MANY NEW YORK RESIDENTS DEATH PENALTY DEBATE

THE PROBLEM OF FALSE CONFESSIONS! • MANY FACTORS BEYOND GUILT CAN SERVE AS MOTIVATION FOR CONFESSION. • HUNGER, FEAR, EXHAUSTION, ACCEPTANCE. 14: 40

CONFORMITY, OBEDIENCE, AND SITUATIONS • MOST PEOPLE TEND TO DO WHAT EVERYONE ELSE DOES OR DO WHAT THEY ARE TOLD. • WE HAVE A TENDENCY TO FOLLOW GROUP PRESSURE OR SOCIAL NORMS ESPECIALLY IF TOLD TO DO SO BY AN AUTHORITY FIGURE. • SITUATIONS CAN ALTER OUR BEHAVIORS AND MAKE US ACT IN WAYS WE NEVER COULD HAVE IMAGINED • ESPECIALLY IF: • WE BELIEVE THE GROUP TO BE INTELLIGENT, POWERFUL, OR ADMIRABLE • DISSENT WITH THE GROUP DOES NOT SEEM LIKE AN OPTION • WE ARE PRESSURED BY AN INDIVIDUAL THAT HOLDS A POSITION OF POWER • THERE IS A DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILITY

BOOKING PROCEDURE • THE PROCESS OF ENTERING A SUSPECTS' NAME, OFFENSE, AND ARRIVAL TIME INTO THE POLICE LOG FOLLOWING HIS OR HER ARREST.

TH 6 AMENDMENT • GUARANTEES A CITIZEN A SPEEDY TRIAL, A FAIR JURY, AN ATTORNEY IF THE ACCUSED PERSON WANTS ONE, AND THE CHANCE TO CONFRONT THE WITNESSES WHO IS ACCUSING THE DEFENDANT OF A CRIME, MEANING HE OR SHE CAN SEE WHO IS MAKING ACCUSATIONS.

8 TH AMENDMENT • PROHIBITS EXCESSIVE BAILS AND FINES AND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT

E R U D E C O POLICE PR USE OF FORCE

STATS • 700, 000 INCIDENTS A YEAR INVOLVE POLICE FORCE OR THE THREAT OF FORCE. • THE RESULTS ARE ABOUT 650 DEATHS A YEAR • FORCE IS NECESSARY WHEN THE SUSPECT MUST PROTECT THEMSELVES OR OTHERS FROM AN IMMINENT THREAT

PRECEDENT • • • 22% OF ARRESTS USE PHYSICAL FORCE OR THE THREATENED OR ACTUAL USE OF A WEAPON POLICE DEPARTMENTS HAVE BEEN ENCOURAGED TO CREATE A USE OF FORCE MATRIX REASONABLE FORCE- DEGREE OF FORCE APPROPRIATE TO PROTECT THE POLICE OR OTHER CITIZENS THAT IS NOT EXCESSIVE DEADLY FORCE- FORCE APPLIED BY A POLICE OFFICER THAT IS LIKELY OR INTENDED TO CAUSE DEATH TENNESSEE V. GARDNER (1985) • • SUSPECT SHOT IN THE BACK WHILE CLIMBING A FENCE AFTER STEALING $10 FOUND UNCONSTITUTIONAL- WHEN NO IMMEDIATE THREAT IS PRESENT THE USE OF DEADLY FORCE IS UNJUSTIFIED GRAHAM V. CONNOR (1989) • • POLICE NEED TO BE ABLE TO MAKE SPLIT SECOND DECISIONS WITHOUT THE THREAT OF LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS USE OF ANY FORCE SHOULD BE JUDGED BY THE REASONABLENESS OF THE MOMENT

WHAT IS EXCESSIVE FORCE (POLICE BRUTALITY)? WHEN POLICE GO BEYOND WHAT IS REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TYPICALLY IS DEFINED AS “PROPORTIONAL RESPONSE” OR WHAT IS REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE OFFICER FROM IMMINENT, SERIOUS BODILY HARM AND/OR DEATH

WHAT IS CONSIDERED EXCESSIVE FORCE? • CLUBBING A SUSPECT WHEN AN ARM HOLD WOULD SUFFICE • SHOOTING AN UNARMED SUSPECT • SHOOTING AN ARMED SUSPECT WHO IS RUNNING AWAY

DEADLY FORCE IS JUSTIFIED… • 1. OFFICER IS ARRESTING FOR FELONY • 2. REASON FOR ARREST HAS BEEN MADE KNOWN TO SUSPECT • 3. OFFICER BELIEVES (REASONABLY) IT IS NECESSARY TO PREVENT HARM OR DEATH TO THE OFFICER OR SOMEONE ELSE • 4. USE OF DEADLY FORCE DOES NOT CREATE HARM TO BYSTANDERS • 5. THE SUSPECT USED DEADLY FORCE OR PROBABLY WILL USE IT IF ARREST/CUSTODY IS DELAYED

BASED ON THE MATRIX • 1. COME UP WITH A SITUATION WHERE AN OFFICER’S TRAINING WOULD SUPPORT THE OFFICER TOUCHING AN INDIVIDUAL. • 2. COME UP WITH A SITUATION IN WHICH AN OFFICER’S TRIAINING WOULD SUPPORT LIGHT JABS WITH NIGHT STICKS AND FLASH LIGHTS. • 3. COME UP WITH A SITUATION IN WHICH AN OFFICER’S TRAINING WOULD SUPPORT THE USE OF TASERS. • 4. COME UP WITH AN EXAMPLE THAT WOULD SUPPORT THE USE OF FIRE ARMS (LETHAL FORCE). • 5. DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS MATRIX? WHY OR WHY NOT?

NON LETHALS • PEPPER SPRAY • TEAR GAS • WATER CANNONS • RUBBER/POLY BULLETS • PROJECTIVE BEAN BAGS • TASERS

THREE LEVELS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT

LAW ENFORCEMENT- SELECTION • LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT • CITY POLICE AGENCIES • COUNTY SHERIFFS • STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT • STATE POLICE • HIGHWAY PATROLS • OTHER STATE LAW ENFORCERS SUCH AS FIRE MARSHALS, WILDLIFE WARDENS, BEVERAGE CONTROL OFFICERS, ETC.

• FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT • THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY • THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) • THE SECRET SERVICE • THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION (DEA) • THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES (ATF)

POLICE TRAINING • POLICE ACADEMY: IS A TRAINING SCHOOL FOR NEW POLICE RECRUITS, ALSO KNOWN AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT ACADEMY. SOME ARE KNOWN AS COLLEGES OR UNIVERSITIES. • THEY ALL HAVE VARIOUS BACKGROUND CHECKS, EXAMINATION, PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS, MEDICAL REQUIREMENTS, LEGAL TRAINING, DRIVING SKILLS, EQUIPMENT TRAINING AND FIREARM TRAINING FOR NEW POLICE RECRUITS. • THE ACADEMY PREPARES THE RECRUITS FOR THE POLICE FORCE THEY WILL BE ASSIGNED TO WHEN THEY GRADUATE.

FBI- CREATED IN 1908 • THE FBI HAS JURISDICTION OVER NEARLY TWO HUNDRED FEDERAL CRIMES INCLUDING: • EXTORTION, INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF STOLEN PROPERTY, SPYING, KIDNAPPING, GAMBLING, AND CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS • ALSO COMBATS WORLDWIDE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY: HUMAN/DRUG TRAFFICKING & TERRORISM

WELCOME • SPECIAL AGENT SETH FLEITMAN • NYSP INVESTIGATOR ANDREW JASIE

WEEK AT A GLANCE • MONDAY- CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PAPER • TUESDAY- CAREERS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT – BRING TEXTBOOK • WEDNESDAY- GUEST SPEAKER NYS TROOPER • THURSDAY- CAREERS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT – RESEARCH • FRIDAY- SERIAL PODCAST EPISODE

THESIS • DOES IT GRAB THE READER’S ATTENTION? • DOES IT SET UP THE PATH FOR THE REST OF THE PAPER? • IS IT CLEAR IN ITS STANCE?

BODY • IS IT ORGANIZED INTO PARAGRAPHS? • DO TRANSITIONS HELP TO MAKE THE ARGUMENT COHESIVE? • IS THESIS SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE? • ARE MULTIPLE ARGUMENTS MADE TO SUPPORT YOUR OVERALL PROPOSAL? • DO YOU MENTION THE COUNTER ARGUMENTS?

CONCLUSION - DRIVES HOME THE MAIN POINT OF YOUR PAPER - RESTATES YOUR THESIS

WWW. CENGAGE. COM/CRIMINALJUSTICE/CAREERS

CHAPTER 5 LAW ENFORCEMENT TODAY

TURN CAP. PUN. PAPER INTO BASKET • HW: LAW ENFORCEMENT BOOK WORK DUE: THUR.

JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIMEPORT: THUR BRING TEXTBOOK FRIDAY.