Table 3 Load increment in for all laminates

Table 3. Load increment (in %) for all laminates Symbol Configuration A B C D E F DS=1. 5 D, 0. 625 D DS=1. 5 D, 0. 75 D DS=2 D, 0. 625 D DS=2 D, 0. 75 D DS=2. 5 D, 0. 625 D DS=2. 5 D, 0. 75 D W/D=2 E/D=1 1. 48 -1. 03 0. 7 -5 2. 4 3. 31 A B C D E F DS=1. 5 D, 0. 625 D DS=1. 5 D, 0. 75 D DS=2 D, 0. 625 D DS=2 D, 0. 75 D DS=2. 5 D, 0. 625 D DS=2. 5 D, 0. 75 D A B C D E F Load increment (in %) W/D=3 W/D=4 W/D=5 2. 89 2. 79 9. 02 9. 62 13. 59 13. 29 0. 97 1. 32 1. 95 3. 04 3. 91 3. 09 6. 94 5. 69 7. 07 3. 83 7. 67 5. 53 E/D=2 9. 78 11. 51 9. 98 16. 11 17. 3 15. 69 4. 48 3. 68 7. 23 9. 07 10. 48 8. 58 6. 36 8. 67 10. 02 9. 47 15. 2 11. 37 3. 68 5. 1 3. 02 4. 95 8. 82 1. 89 DS=1. 5 D, 0. 625 D DS=1. 5 D, 0. 75 D DS=2 D, 0. 625 D DS=2 D, 0. 75 D DS=2. 5 D, 0. 625 D DS=2. 5 D, 0. 75 D E/D=3 7. 46 9. 52 10. 34 12 7. 67 6. 24 4. 77 7. 66 5. 71 13. 13 17. 04 12. 71 7. 48 11. 24 10. 81 9. 33 20. 87 17. 13 2. 34 3. 09 3. 23 8. 6 10. 7 7. 73 A B C D E F DS=1. 5 D, 0. 625 D DS=1. 5 D, 0. 75 D DS=2 D, 0. 625 D DS=2 D, 0. 75 D DS=2. 5 D, 0. 625 D DS=2. 5 D, 0. 75 D E/D=4 6. 17 9. 22 3. 26 15. 31 10. 13 15. 48 6. 22 14. 94 12. 14 18. 84 19. 48 19. 14 4. 81 4. 57 7. 11 3. 9 9. 09 5. 14 2. 27 5. 96 4. 11 4. 98 15. 01 13. 17 A B C D E F DS=1. 5 D, 0. 625 D DS=1. 5 D, 0. 75 D DS=2 D, 0. 625 D DS=2 D, 0. 75 D DS=2. 5 D, 0. 625 D DS=2. 5 D, 0. 75 D E/D=5 1. 94 8. 27 3. 28 9. 5 8. 38 10. 34 25. 67 22. 14 31. 29 32. 39 34. 81 28. 89 2. 73 3. 22 8. 34 6. 61 11. 59 7. 08 Khudhayer J. Jadee et al. The Effect of Defence Hole System on the Failure Load and Bearing Strength of GFRP Bolted Joint. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 4, 135 -141. doi: 10. 12691/ajme-3 -4 -5 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.