Table 1 Evaluation instrument blueprint adapted from 9

Table 1. Evaluation instrument blueprint (adapted from [9]) DIMENSION INDICATOR Clarity of instruction message links Impact on learner attitudes achievement Student, Subject Matter Expert, Instructional Design Expert, Instructor Maturity Independence Motivation Congruence between content in the materials and the terminal and performance objectives. Adequacy of content coverage and completeness. Authority Accuracy Currency Objectivity Subject Matter Expert, Instructional Design Expert, Student, Instructor Feasibility Goal-centered DATA SOURCE Subject Matter Expert, Linguist, Student, Instructor, Instructional Design Expert INSTRUMENT MODEL Interview guidance Questionnaire Field observation Instructional Design Expert Subject Matter Expert Interview guidance Printed Media Expert Multimedia Specialist Student Interview guidance Student and Instructor Questionnaire Linguist Interview guidance The delivery system and media formats (appropriate for the objectives and the learning context). Technical Attention Relevance Confidence Satisfaction Language Packaging Congruence between video role-play demo and its storyboard. Graphic design and typography Durability Audio and video quality Interface design, navigation, and functionality. Interesting Relevance between instructional material and actual service in AFIS aerodrome. Confidence that using this instructional model can learn new skill, knowledge, and attitude for practicing in AFIS aerodrome. Satisfaction of facilities, instructors, pace, instruction, new skill that have developed/refined. Language style used in instructional materials Sri Rahayu Surtiningtyas et al. Blended Learning Simulation Based Model Development. American Journal of Educational Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 11, 1114 -1119. doi: 10. 12691/education-5 -11 -1 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.