Swarm ACC and GPSR summary Christian Siemes Swarm

  • Slides: 14
Download presentation
Swarm ACC and GPSR summary Christian Siemes Swarm Data Quality Workshop 02. 12. 2014,

Swarm ACC and GPSR summary Christian Siemes Swarm Data Quality Workshop 02. 12. 2014, Potsdam, Germany ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use

ACC summary Temperature dependency Fast disturbances (steps, spikes, …) Problem 1: Temperature correction model

ACC summary Temperature dependency Fast disturbances (steps, spikes, …) Problem 1: Temperature correction model established, but estimating its parameters remains challenging (even for good periods without steps) Problem 2: Step detection algorithm established, correction algorithm pending

ACC summary Swarm A measures the same as Swarm C, but • with much

ACC summary Swarm A measures the same as Swarm C, but • with much smaller scale • obscured by higher noise • skewed by temperature effect ACC on Swarm C is best

ACC summary Way forward Processing • Use POD-derived accelerations in estimation of temperature correction

ACC summary Way forward Processing • Use POD-derived accelerations in estimation of temperature correction Caveat: No possibility to validate temperature correction • Occurrence of spikes and steps in Swarm C seems to vary over time Investigate why good periods are good • For L 2 density product, focus on Swarm C ACC data Spacecraft • • Optimization of the ACC thermal environment Scale factor calibration by ACT activations (under discussion) Release L 1 b and/or L 2 data to cal/val users with flaws (discussion needed, user demand)

GPSR summary ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use

GPSR summary ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use

GPSR summary Activated: Antenna + receiver corrections Carrier smoothing algorithm Phase residuals 9. 8

GPSR summary Activated: Antenna + receiver corrections Carrier smoothing algorithm Phase residuals 9. 8 mm Code residuals 40 cm Deactivated Antenna + receiver correction Carrier smoothing algorithm Phase residuals 8. 4 mm Code residuals 43 cm Note: Impact on orbit negligible

GPSR summary SLR validation of reduced-dynamic orbit (< 2 cm when PCV map used)

GPSR summary SLR validation of reduced-dynamic orbit (< 2 cm when PCV map used)

GPSR summary Fit between kinematic and reduced-dynamic orbits Differences at 10 cm level Quality

GPSR summary Fit between kinematic and reduced-dynamic orbits Differences at 10 cm level Quality of kinematic orbits varies in time probably due to ionosphere Clear improvement of kinematic orbits due to 1 Hz GPS data

GPSR summary

GPSR summary

GPSR summary Significant increase in carrier-phase residuals during last few months

GPSR summary Significant increase in carrier-phase residuals during last few months

GPSR summary Monthly gravity field solutions • Coloured: Swarm • Black: GRACE (GPS only)

GPSR summary Monthly gravity field solutions • Coloured: Swarm • Black: GRACE (GPS only) 6 months ago in Copenhagen Today in Potsdam

GPSR summary Some features easier to remove with 1 Hz data

GPSR summary Some features easier to remove with 1 Hz data

GPSR summary • Swarm reduced-dynamic orbits are of good quality (SLR fit < 2

GPSR summary • Swarm reduced-dynamic orbits are of good quality (SLR fit < 2 cm) • Quality of Swarm kinematic orbits is worse, especially close to geomagnetic poles and equator (3 D fit of ~10 cm with reduced-dynamic orbits) • Quality of Swarm kinematic orbits improves with 1 Hz GPS data • Large increase in GPS phase residuals during last few months probably related to ionospheric activity • Data screening of GPS data based on high ionospheric variability has only marginal effect on the orbit • Gravity field models benefited from better processing and receiver settings

GPSR summary Way forward Further optimization of receiver (under discussion) • • • Prevent

GPSR summary Way forward Further optimization of receiver (under discussion) • • • Prevent Loss. Of. Sync events Continuous time information, in particular for ASM • Reduce the number of GPS SVs required to invoke the Kalman filter based PVT calculation from 3 to 1 • Activate the fast re‐acquisition of the L 1 carrier Orbit improvement • Increase the carrier loop bandwidth for the L 2 carrier tracking loop • Link between tracking loop bandwidth and antenna Fo. V Complexity of changes and system impact under investigation • Which changes can be implemented with/without interruption of nominal operations? (GPSR AOCS) Further improvement of processing