Surveillance and Broadcast Services ADSB Status Briefing ASAS

Surveillance and Broadcast Services ADS-B Status Briefing: ASAS TN 2. 5 By: Vincent Capezzuto Date: November 2008 Federal Aviation Administration

Agenda • • • Dual Track Strategy Essential Services Status Critical Services Status Rulemaking Status $9. 3 M Acquisition Next Steps Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 2

Dual Track Strategy Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 3

FAA Key Sites Juneau Philadelphia Louisville Miami (Essential) Gulf of Mexico = Key Site Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 4

Essential Services: Miami (St. Cloud) (Key West) Surveillance and Broadcast Services (Homestead) Federal Aviation Administration 5

Eastern Service Area – Miami Key Site • South Florida Broadcast Services – Operational since August 2008 Radio Station Status 9/24/08 SV-168 UAT – Overview (TIS-B and FIS-B) Surveillance and Broadcast Services SV-168 1090 ES – Overview (TIS-B) Federal Aviation Administration 6

Hardee Radio Station Installation Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 7

Sebastian Airport Installation Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 8

Key West Installation SV 168 -01 Key West (Beach TV) Radio Cabinet on Platform Note: The Key West site is in a flood plain, so a raised structure was required Surveillance and Broadcast Services SV 168 -01 Key West (Beach TV) Radio Cabinet Installed on Platform SV 168 -01 Key West (Beach TV) Antenna Array Federal Aviation Administration 9

Essential Services: Plan for ISD Milestone Planned Date of Completion Preliminary Design Review (PDR) November 2007 ü Critical Design Review (CDR) February 2008 ü Factory Acceptance Test for Essential Services May 2008 ü Service Acceptance Test for Essential Services June 2008 ü End to End System Test August 2008 ü Operational Test August 2008 ü Initial Operating Capability (IOC) for Essential Services August 2008 ü Independent Assessment Data Collection September 13 – September 30, 2008 ü Preliminary Report / Briefing October 15, 2008 ü Independent Assessment Final Report November 18, 2008 In-Service Decision November 24, 2008 Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 10

Eastern Service Area Philadelphia and Louisville Key Sites • Critical Services – Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS -B) • New ADS-B Operational at Louisville: (October 2009) • New ADS-B Operational at Philadelphia (February 2010) Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 11

Central Service Area Gulf of Mexico / Houston Key Site • Critical Services – New ADS-B, Weather and Communications • All Operational: Gulf of Mexico/ZHU (December 2009) Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 12

Western Service Area Juneau Key Site • Critical Services – Wide-Area Multilateration (WAM) • New WAM Operational: ZAN (June 2009) & ZDV (April 2009) – Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) • New ADS-B Operational: ZAN (April 2010) – Statewide Expansion of ADS-B with Communications & Weather Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 13

September 2008 ARC Report Overview • The ARC made 36 summary recommendations divided into two broad categories: – Recommendations to be resolved before any rule is adopted = 26 • • • ADS-B Link Strategy ADS-B Program and Business Case Performance Requirements Required Equipment Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Equipment – Recommendations for future = 10 • • ADS-B Program and Business Case Required Equipment Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Equipment Security, Privacy, and Malicious Use The ARC emphasizes its support for ADS–B Out implementation in the NAS by 2020. Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 14

ARC Recommendations: Use of DO-260 • Specific Recommendations: – Recommendation #6 (For Final Rule): Consistent with the ARC’s task 1 report, Optimizing the Benefits of ADS–B, the FAA should enable the use of DO– 260 approved equipment for non-separation applications in the NPRM business case such as conflict probe in radar airspace. The FAA should operationally validate these benefits as soon as possible, to give operators confidence in the benefits of ADS–B Out. – Recommendation #10 (For Final Rule): To approve the use of DO– 260 -like equipage, the FAA should adopt, for 5 nm separations in non-radar airspace to include at least the Gulf of Mexico, European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) 20– 24, with appropriate measures to ensure ADS–B integrity. – Recommendation #28 (Longer Term): To support early ADS–B benefits with DO– 260 -approved equipment, the FAA should further explore opportunities within the ADS–B ground infrastructure/ATC automation to fuse data to accommodate the lack of transmission of the Mode 3/A code. Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 15

ARC Recommendations: Use of DO-260 Hardee, Florida ADS-B Receive Coverage Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 16

ARC Recommendations: Use of DO-260 Functional Flow Diagram Surveillance and Broadcast Services • AIR certification of pre existing DO 260 • Changes in ATC procedures • Aircraft Certification List • Flight Plan track association based on call sign / ICAO address • RAIM prediction & availability assessment • Target selection filter Federal Aviation Administration 17

ARC Recommendation #29 (Longer Term): En Route 3 nm Separation • The FAA should develop and implement the requirements and operational procedures for 3 nm separation in all domestic en route airspace based on ADS-B surveillance, before the ADS–B Out compliance date. Surveillance and Broadcast Services En route Airspace 5 nm Separation Transition Area effective separation < 5 nm but >3 nm Terminal Airspace 3 nm Separation Federal Aviation Administration 18

ARC Recommendation #31 (Longer Term): Search and Rescue • The FAA should explore the opportunity of providing an enhancement to the emergency locator transmitter (ELT)/search and rescue operation by establishing an ADS-B tracking service that could be used to aid in crash locating. Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 19

ARC Recommendation #27 (Longer Term): ADS-B In • The NPRM is focused on ADS– B Out and attempts to establish the requirements of ADS–B Out equipment so that it is compatible with ADS–B In. The FAA, in partnership with industry, should define a strategy for ADS–B In by 2012, ensuring the strategy is compatible with ADS–B Out avionics. The FAA also should ensure this program defines how to proceed with ADS–B In beyond the voluntary equipage concept included in the NPRM. Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 20

In Trail Procedures Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 21

Flight Deck Merging and Spacing (FDMS) Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 22

$9. 3 M Acquisition: ATSA Conflict Detection on the Surface Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 23

$9. 3 M Acquisition: Background • The FY 08 Conference Report accompanying H. R. 3074 has provided additional funding to the ADS-B program "specifically to expedite air to air capabilities" • FAA intends to utilize this funding to demonstrate ADS-B capabilities in the areas of surface conflict detection and cockpit alert capabilities Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 24

$9. 3 M Acquisition: Awards On November 3, 2008 the FAA announced awards to two different vendors Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 25

$9. 3 M Acquisition: Honeywell Award • • • Award: $3 M Proposal: Develop requirements, standards and human factors analysis Location(s): – Seattle Tacoma – Snohomish County Paine Field • Aircraft (experimental): – 1 Cessna Sovereign – 1 Beechcraft King • • Display: EFB and MFD Pilots: – Jet. Blue Airways – Alaska Airline Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 26

$9. 3 M Acquisition: ACSS Award • Award: $6 M • Proposal: Create standards, flight demonstrations and prototypes • Partner: US Airways • Location: Philadelphia • Aircraft (1 experimental, 20 revenue service): – King Air C 90 (1) – Airbus 330 (20) • Display: Class 2 EFB / AGD Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 27

FY 2009 / FY 2010 Next Steps Milestone Planned Date / Status In Service Decision for Broadcast Services November 2008 Critical Services Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Complete March 2009 Key Site Service Acceptance Test (SAT) Louisville Service Acceptance Test (SAT) Complete April 2009 Gulf of Mexico Service Acceptance Test (SAT) June 2009 Philadelphia Service Acceptance Test (SAT) August 2009 Juneau Service Acceptance Test (SAT) October 2009 Key Site Initial Operating Capability (IOC) Louisville IOC of Surveillance Services October 2009 Gulf of Mexico IOC of Surveillance Services December 2009 Philadelphia IOC of Surveillance Services February 2010 Juneau IOC of Surveillance Services April 2010 Program Milestones Final Rule Published April 2010 Surveillance Services ISD for ADS-B September 2010 Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 28

Thank You Achieving results through coordinated international collaboration Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 29

Backup Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 30

Ground Infrastructure: 794 Ground Station Solution Provides National Coverage Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 31

ITT ADS-B Locations are subject to change Surveillance and Broadcast Services 22 Locations (9 shore /13 platform) Federal Aviation Administration 32

ITT AWOS Locations are subject to change Surveillance and Broadcast Services 37 Locations Federal Aviation Administration 33

FAA VHF Communication Locations Communication Sensors High Altitude (10 total sites, 4 new, 6 existing) Low Altitude (17 total sites, 5 new, 12 existing) Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 34

Summary of Recommendations for Final Rule Recommendation # Summary ADS-B Link Strategy Recommendation #1 Urgent 1090 Study Recommendation #2 Articulate changes to ACAS Recommendation #3 Collaborate with ARC on final link decision ADS-B Program and Business Case Recommendation #4 Retain 2020 compliance date, incorporate additional benefits Recommendation #5 SNPRM (assuming contingencies) Recommendation #6 Enable DO-260 Recommendation #7 Preference routes and procedures Recommendation #8 Recalculate cost benefit analysis Recommendation #9 Ensure cost/benefit to all operators, validate ARC cost figures Recommendation #10 Use AMC 20 -24 to separate in NRA at 5 miles in at least the Gulf Recommendation #11 Delay compliance date (with conditions) Recommendation #12 Airspace exclusion at 2500 AGL Recommendation #13 Include FIS-B and TIS-B in preamble Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 35

Summary of Recommendations for Final Rule Recommendation # Summary Performance Requirements Recommendation #14 Performance Requirements per domain Recommendation #15 Latency recommendations Recommendation #16 Not apply vertical position accuracy in NAC 9 Recommendation #17 Allow foreign satellite constellations Recommendation #18 Non-Diversity Antenna Recommendation #19 Use DO-289 MASPS to define SIL Recommendation #20 Broadcast message element recommendations Recommendation #21 Calculate/report continuity of RNP parameters Recommendation #22 Specify continuity requirement Recommendation #23 Specify 2 continuity requirements for ASSA and FAROA Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 36

Summary of Recommendations for Final Rule Recommendation # Summary Required Equipment Recommendation #24 Turn Off ADS-B Recommendation #25 Commit to transponder removal, explain why transponders are needed short-term (new backup strategy) Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Equipment Recommendation #26 Surveillance and Broadcast Services CNS roadmap in final rule Federal Aviation Administration 37

Summary of Longer Term Recommendations Recommendation # Summary ADS-B Program and Business Case Recommendation #27 Define strategy for ADS-B In Recommendation #28 Fuse data in automation to accommodate lack of Mode 3/A Code Recommendation #29 3 nm en route separation Required Equipment Recommendation #30 Implement transponder removal for low altitude operators not equipped with ACAS Recommendation #31 Enhance ELT with tracking service Recommendation #32 Replace ELTs Communication, Navigation, and Surveillance Equipment Recommendation #33 Integrated CNS strategy to deal with GNSS outages Security, Privacy and Malicious Use Recommendation #34 ICAO codes treated under privacy laws Recommendation #35 Use Anonymity for UAT, develop a feature for it on 1090 MHz Recommendation #36 Assign ICAO codes so they don't correlate with tail numbers Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 38

Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 39

Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 40

Sebastian Airport Installation Surveillance and Broadcast Services Federal Aviation Administration 41

Process for Selecting Applications Identify NAS needs (Problems) Portfolio of applications from existing sources Decompose into subproblems PHASE 1 Application Characterization Is application a subset of / traceable to an existing AIWP application? Yes Map sub-problems to required capabilities Refer to AIWP Identify applications to support capabilities No Develop/Refine application description Is application description sufficient to enable business case analysis? No Yes Eliminate applications below minimum threshold Conduct business case analysis PHASE 2 Application Prioritization Rank application based on business case results Yes Surveillance and Broadcast Services Steering Committee requires mods to prioritized list? No Timeline of Applications Federal Aviation Administration 42

Surveillance and Broadcast Services Program Earned Value Management (September 2008) Technical Performance Measures (TPMs) FIS-B Transmission Interval: NEXRAD Reflectivity (CONUS) is turned off and the issue being worked on. No impact on the system performance. NEXRAD Reflectivity (Regional) software fix is under testing Schedule Status (FY 08 / FY 09 / FY 10) FY 08 Milestones Preliminary Design Review (PDR) November 2007 Critical Design Review (CDR) February 2008 Close of NPRM Comment Period March 2008 Factory Acceptance Test for Essential Services May 2008 Service Acceptance Test for Essential Services June 2008 End to End System Test / Operational Test August 2008 Initial Operating Capability (IOC) August 2008 ü ü ü ü Program Risks High: FY 09 Milestones FY 10 Milestones Independent Assessment November 2008 Juneau SAT October 2009 In-Service Decision November 2008 Louisville IOC of Surveillance Services October 2009 Medium: 1. Avionics Standards Louisville SAT April 2009 Gulf of Mexico IOC of Surveillance Services December 2009 2. Application Standards 3. Separation Standards Gulf of Mexico Weather Service Acceptance Test (SAT) June 2009 Philadelphia IOC of Surveillance Services February 2010 4. Juneau WAM 5. Gulf Surv. Sites 6. CARTS 7. STARS 8. CD-2 Status Message 9. ARC Recommendations Gulf of Mexico SAT June 2009 Juneau IOC of Surveillance Services April 2010 Philadelphia SAT August 2009 Final Rule Published April 2010 Gulf of Mexico Comm. and Weather IOC September 2009 Surveillance Services ISD for ADS-B September 2010 1. Rule 2. Spectrum 3. MEARTS 10. WAM CD-2 Status Message 18 Rated Risks: 3 High, 10 Medium, 5 Low