Supplemental Fig 1 Supplemental Digital Content 1 Supplemental

Supplemental Fig. 1, Supplemental Digital Content 1 Supplemental Fig. 1. Comparisons of (a) dyslipidaemia, (b) final MLD, (c) distance between ostium of the LAD and proximal edge of the stent, (d) lesion length, (e) LMT-LAD angle (Spider view), (f) LMT-LCX angle (Spider view), (g) LAD-LCX angle (Spider view) and (h) LMT-LAD angle (RAO caudal view) in the no restenosis, in-stent restenosis and in-segment restenosis groups. (a) Dyslipidaemia P = 0. 013 P = 0. 972 P = 0. 530 (b) Final MLD (mm) P = 0. 004 P = 0. 007 P = 0. 691 3. 5 (%) 3. 0 100 2. 5 80 2. 0 60 1. 5 40 1. 0 20 0. 5 0 0 In-stent In-segment No Restenosis Restenosis

(c) Distance between ostium of LAD and proximal edge of stent (d) Lesion length P = 0. 002 P = 0. 590 P = 0. 062 (mm) P = 0. 411 14 (mm) 12 30 10 25 8 20 6 15 4 10 2 5 0 0 In-stent In-segment No Restenosis P = 0. 026 P = 0. 020 In-stent In-segment No Restenosis

(e) LMT-LAD angle (Spider view) (f) LMT-LCX angle (Spider view) P = 0. 121 (degree) P = 0. 449 P<0. 001 P = 0. 036 P = 0. 681 P = 0. 688 (degree) 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 In-stent In-segment No Restenosis Restenosis

(g) LAD-LCX angle (Spider view) (h) LMT-LAD angle (RAO/CAU view) P = 0. 497 (degree) P = 0. 007 P = 0. 044 P<0. 001 100 P<0. 001 P = 0. 403 (degree) 80 40 60 30 40 20 20 10 0 0 In-stent In-segment No Restenosis Restenosis