Superconductivity Introduction Thermal properties specific heat entropy free

  • Slides: 39
Download presentation
Superconductivity • Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic

Superconductivity • Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic properties • critical field, critical current, Meissner effect, type II SC • London theory of the Meissner effect • penetration length, coherence length, surface energy • Microscopic (BCS) theory • Cooper pair, BCS ground state • Flux quantization Dept of Phys • Quantum tunneling • single particle tunneling, DC/AC Josephson effect • SQUID M. C. Chang

A brief history of low temperature (Ref: 絕對零度的探索) • 1800 Charles and Gay-Lusac (from

A brief history of low temperature (Ref: 絕對零度的探索) • 1800 Charles and Gay-Lusac (from P-T relationship) proposed that the lowest temperature is -273 C (= 0 K) • 1877 Cailletet and Pictet liquified Oxygen (-183 C or 90 K) • soon after, Nitrogen (77 K) is liquified • 1898 Dewar liquified Hydrogen (20 K) • 1908 Onnes liquified Helium (4. 2 K) • 1911 Onnes measured the resistance of metal at such a low T. To remove residual resistance, he chose mercury. Near 4 K, the resistance drops to 0! Au Hg R 1913 R T Discovery of superconductivity

Is the resistivity very small or really zero? : Persistent current (Onnes) • open

Is the resistivity very small or really zero? : Persistent current (Onnes) • open S 2 and close S 1: there Switch 1 is current in SC coil. • close S 2 and open S 1: the current in SC coil remains the same for several hours. Liquid He Switch 2 • similar experiment years later detected no decay of current for 2 years! • Such a current can be a powerful source of magnetic field (however, see later discussion on critical current). SC coil compass

In the form of nanostructure (type II) 0. 03 K 1. 14 K 0.

In the form of nanostructure (type II) 0. 03 K 1. 14 K 0. 39 K 5. 38 K 0. 88 K 1. 09 K 0. 55 K 9. 50 K 0. 92 K 7. 77 K 0. 51 K 0. 0003 K 0. 56 K 3. 40 K 3. 72 K 4. 88 K 0. 12 K 4. 48 K 0. 01 K 1. 4 K 0. 66 K 0. 14 K 1. 37 K 1. 4 K 0. 20 K 4. 15 K 2. 39 K 7. 19 K 0. 60 K Tc's given are for bulk, except for Palladium, which has been irradiated with He+ ions, Chromium as a thin film, and Platinum as a compacted powder http: //superconductors. org/Type 1. htm

Superconducting transition temperature (K) Superconductivity in alloys and oxides 160 Hg. Ba 2 Cu

Superconducting transition temperature (K) Superconductivity in alloys and oxides 160 Hg. Ba 2 Cu 3 O 9 (under pressure) 140 Hg. Ba 2 Cu 3 O 9 Tl. Ba. Cu. O 120 Bi. Ca. Sr. Cu. O 100 Applications of superconductor • powerful magnet YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7 Liquid Nitrogen temperature (77 K) 80 • MRI, the deceased SSC. . . 60 • magnetic levitation 40 20 (La. Ba)Cu. O Hg Pb Nb 1910 Nb. C Nb. N 1930 Nb 3 Sn • speed train Nb 3 Ge • SQUID (超導量子干涉儀) V 3 Si 1950 1970 Bednorz Muller 1987 From Cywinski’s lecture note • detect tiny magnetic field 1990 • quantum bits • lossless powerline (IF there is room temperature SC)

 • Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic

• Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic properties • critical field, critical current, Meissner effect, type II SC • London theory of the Meissner effect • penetration length, coherence length, surface energy • Microscopic (BCS) theory • Cooper pair, BCS ground state • Flux quantization • Quantum tunneling • single particle tunneling, DC/AC Josephson effect • SQUID

Thermal properties of SC: specific heat Critical temperature The exponential dependence with T is

Thermal properties of SC: specific heat Critical temperature The exponential dependence with T is called “activation” behavior and implies the existence of an energy gap above Fermi surface ~ 0. 1 -1 me. V (10 -4~-5 EF )

Temperature dependence of Connection between energy gap and Tc ‘s scale with different Tc’s

Temperature dependence of Connection between energy gap and Tc ‘s scale with different Tc’s 2 (0) ~ 3. 5 k. BTc (obtained from Tunneling) Universal behavior of (T)

Entropy and free energy of SC state Al Less entropy in SC state: more

Entropy and free energy of SC state Al Less entropy in SC state: more ordering FN-FS Al = Condensation energy 10 -8 e. V per electron! 2 nd order phase transition

More evidences of energy gap • Electron tunneling (discussed later) • EM wave absorption

More evidences of energy gap • Electron tunneling (discussed later) • EM wave absorption 2 suggests excitations created in “e-h” pairs

 • Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic

• Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic properties • critical field, critical current, Meissner effect, type II SC • London theory of the Meissner effect • penetration length, coherence length, surface energy • Microscopic (BCS) theory • Cooper pair, BCS ground state • Flux quantization • Quantum tunneling • single particle tunneling, DC/AC Josephson effect • SQUID

Magnetic property of the superconductor Superconductivity is destroyed by a strong magnetic field Hc

Magnetic property of the superconductor Superconductivity is destroyed by a strong magnetic field Hc for metal is of the order of 0. 1 Tesla or less Temperature dependence of Hc(T) All curves can be collapsed onto a similar curve after re-scaling normal sc

Critical currents (no applied field) Hi Actual situation is more complicated! (London, 1937; see

Critical currents (no applied field) Hi Actual situation is more complicated! (London, 1937; see Tinkham, p. 34) Radius, a Magnetic field Current i so The critical current density of a long thin wire is therefore (thinner wire has larger Jc) jc~108 A/cm 2 for Hc=500 Oe, a=500 A Jc has a similar temperature dependence as Hc, and Tc is similarly lowered as J increases From Cywinski’s lecture note (R = a at j = jc)

Meissner effect (Meissner and Ochsenfeld, 1933) normal sc Lenz law not only d. B/dt=0

Meissner effect (Meissner and Ochsenfeld, 1933) normal sc Lenz law not only d. B/dt=0 but also B=0! Active exclusion that violates Faraday’s law! Perfect diamagnetism. different same

Meissner effect for a hollow cylinder Apply a field, then lower below Tc: There

Meissner effect for a hollow cylinder Apply a field, then lower below Tc: There are surface currents on both inside and outside. no field inside the ring. Remove the field: surface current on the outside disappears; surface current on the inside persists Magnetic flux is trapped! Q: what if we reduce T first, apply a field, then remove the field? (Alan Portis, Sec 8. 7)

Superconducting alloy: partial exclusion and remains superconducting at high B (1935) (intermediate/mixed/vortex/Shubnikov state) pure

Superconducting alloy: partial exclusion and remains superconducting at high B (1935) (intermediate/mixed/vortex/Shubnikov state) pure In HC 2 is of the order of 10~100 Tesla (called hard, or type II, superconductor) 2003

Comparison between type I and type II superconductors B=H+4 M Hc 2 Lead +

Comparison between type I and type II superconductors B=H+4 M Hc 2 Lead + (A) 0%, (B) 2. 08%, (C) 8. 23%, (D) 20. 4% Indium Areas below the curves (=condensation energy) remain the same! Condensation energy (for type I)

 • Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic

• Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic properties • critical field, critical current, Meissner effect, type II SC • London theory of the Meissner effect • penetration length, coherence length, surface energy • Microscopic (BCS) theory • Cooper pair, BCS ground state • Flux quantization • Quantum tunneling • single particle tunneling, DC/AC Josephson effect • SQUID

London theory of the Meissner effect (Two-fluid model) Carrier density (Fritz London and Heinz

London theory of the Meissner effect (Two-fluid model) Carrier density (Fritz London and Heinz London, 1934) = Superfluid density ns nn Normal fluid density nn ns Tc They assumed T like free charges where London proposed It can be shown that =0 for simply connected sample (See Schrieffer)

Penetration length L Outside the SC, B=B(x) z (expulsion of magnetic field) Temperature dependence

Penetration length L Outside the SC, B=B(x) z (expulsion of magnetic field) Temperature dependence of L tin Predicted L(0)=340 A, measured 510 A also decays Higher T, smaller n. S

Coherence length 0 (Pippard, 1939) 0 ~ 1 m >> for type I SC

Coherence length 0 (Pippard, 1939) 0 ~ 1 m >> for type I SC ns surface In fact, ns cannot be uniform near a surface. The length it takes for ns to drop from full value to 0 is called 0 Microscopically it’s related to the range of the Cooper pair The pair wave function (with range 0) is a superposition of one-electron states with energies within of EF (A+M, p. 742) Therefore, the spatial range of the variation of n. S superconductor x

Penetration depth, correlation length, and surface energy: For 0 > Surface energy is positive:

Penetration depth, correlation length, and surface energy: For 0 > Surface energy is positive: Type I superconductivity For 0 < Surface energy is negative: Type II superconductivity From Cywinski’s lecture note • smaller , cost more energy to expel the magnetic field • smaller 0, get more “negative” condensation energy • When 0 >> (type I), there is a net positive surface energy. (difficult to create an interface) • When 0 << (type II), the surface energy is negative. Interface may spontaneously appear.

Vortex state of type II superconductor (Abrikosov, 1957) • the magnetic flux in a

Vortex state of type II superconductor (Abrikosov, 1957) • the magnetic flux in a vortex is always quantized (discussed later) 2003 • the vortices repel each other slightly • the vortices prefer to form a triangular lattice (Abrikosov lattice) • the vortices can move and dissipate energy (unless pinned by impurity) 0 Hc 1 Hc 2 H -M From Cywinski’s lecture note

Estimation of Hc 1 and Hc 2 Near Hc 1, there begins with a

Estimation of Hc 1 and Hc 2 Near Hc 1, there begins with a single vortex with flux quantum 0, therefore Near Hc 2, vortex are as closely packed as the coherence length allows, therefore Typical values, for Nb 3 Sn, 0 34 A, L 1600 A

 • Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic

• Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic properties • critical field, critical current, Meissner effect, type II SC • London theory of the Meissner effect • penetration length, coherence length, surface energy • Microscopic (BCS) theory • Cooper pair, BCS ground state • Flux quantization • Quantum tunneling • single particle tunneling, DC/AC Josephson effect • SQUID

Microscopic picture of the SC state? • Metal X can (cannot) superconduct because its

Microscopic picture of the SC state? • Metal X can (cannot) superconduct because its atoms can (cannot) superconduct? Neither Au nor Bi is superconductor, but alloy Au 2 Bi is! White tin can, grey tin cannot! (the only difference is lattice structure) • good normal conductors (Cu, Ag, Au) are bad superconductor, bad normal conductors are good superconductors, why? • Why is the superconducting gap so small? • Failed attempts: polaron, CDW. . . • Isotope effect (1950): It is found that Tc =const M 1/2 for different materials mercury

Brief history of theories of superconductors • 1935 London: superconductivity is a quantum phenomenon

Brief history of theories of superconductors • 1935 London: superconductivity is a quantum phenomenon on a macroscopic scale. There is a “rigid” (due to the energy gap) superconducting wave function • 1950 • Frohlich: electron-phonon interaction maybe crucial • Reynolds et al, Maxwell: isotope effect • Ginzburg-Landau theory: S can be varied in space. Suggested the connection and wrote down the eq. for (r) (App. I) Difficulty: the condensation energy is 10 8 e. V per electron! 2003 • 1956 Cooper: attractive interaction between electrons (with the help of crystal vibrations) near the FS forms a bound state • 1957 Bardeen, Cooper, Schrieffer: BCS theory • Microscopic wave function for the condensation of Cooper pairs Ref: 1972 Nobel lectures by Bardeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer 1972

Dynamic electron-lattice interaction +++ e Effective attractive interaction between 2 electrons 0. 1 m

Dynamic electron-lattice interaction +++ e Effective attractive interaction between 2 electrons 0. 1 m Phase space argument (more phase space available, stronger interaction): Momentum is conserved during phonon exchange p 1+p 2=p’ 1+p’ 2=P The # of energy-reducing phonon exchange processes is max for P=0 p 1 = -p 2 p 1 p -p 2 P D p 1 p 2 (a) p 1 P (b) P=0 p 2 (c)

Cooper pair (Cooper, 1956) 2 electrons with opposite momenta (p , -p ) can

Cooper pair (Cooper, 1956) 2 electrons with opposite momenta (p , -p ) can form a bound state with binding energy (the spin is opposite by Pauli principle) • Fraction of electrons involved k. Tc/EF 10 -4 • Average spacing between condensate electrons 10 nm 2 (0) ~ 3. 5 k. BTc • Therefore, within the volume occupied by the Cooper pair, there approximately (0. 1 m/10 nm)3 103 other pairs. • These pairs (similar to bosons) are highly correlated and form a macroscopic condensate state BCS with (non-perturbative result!) Schafroth (1951): Meisner effect cannot be obtained in any finite order of perturbation. Migdal (1958): no energy gap from the perturbation theory. • Electrons within k. TC of the FS have their energy lowered by the order of k. TC in the condensation (therefore 10 -8 e. V per electron).

Distribution function and DOS below Tc BCS ground state (Schrieffer, 1957. Ref: 李正中 固體理論)

Distribution function and DOS below Tc BCS ground state (Schrieffer, 1957. Ref: 李正中 固體理論) (phase coherent state) Density of states of quasi-particles D(E) ~ O(1) me. V

 • Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic

• Introduction • Thermal properties • specific heat, entropy, free energy • Magnetic properties • critical field, critical current, Meissner effect, type II SC • London theory of the Meissner effect • penetration length, coherence length, surface energy • Microscopic (BCS) theory • Cooper pair, BCS ground state • Flux quantization • Quantum tunneling • single particle tunneling, DC/AC Josephson effect • SQUID

Flux quantization in a superconducting ring (F. London 1948 with a factor of 2

Flux quantization in a superconducting ring (F. London 1948 with a factor of 2 error, Byers and Yang, also Brenig, 1961) Current density operator In the presence of B field London eq. with Not simply connected Inside a ring 0 the flux of the Earth's magnetic field through a human red blood cell (~ 7 microns)

Single particle tunneling (Giaever, 1960) SIN d. I/d. V Phonon structure 20 -30 A

Single particle tunneling (Giaever, 1960) SIN d. I/d. V Phonon structure 20 -30 A thick SIS Ref: Giaever’s 1973 Nobel prize lecture For T>0 (Tinkham, p. 77) 1973

Josephson effect (predicted by Josephson, 1962. For related debate, see “The true genius”, by

Josephson effect (predicted by Josephson, 1962. For related debate, see “The true genius”, by L. Hoddeson) 1) DC effect: there is a DC current through SIS in the absence of voltage 1973

2) AC Josephson effect apply a DC voltage, then there is a rf current

2) AC Josephson effect apply a DC voltage, then there is a rf current oscillation • An AC supercurrent of Cooper pairs with freq. =2 e. V/h, a weak microwave is generated. • can be measured very accurately, so tiny V as small as 10 -15 V can be detected. • Also, since V can be measured with accuracy about 1 part in 1010, so 2 e/h can be measured accurately. • JJ-based voltage standard (1990): 1 V the voltage that produces a frequency of 483, 597. 9 GHz (exact). • advantage: independent of material, lab, time (similar to the quantum Hall standard)

3) DC+AC: apply a DC+rf voltage, there is a DC current Shapiro steps (1963)

3) DC+AC: apply a DC+rf voltage, there is a DC current Shapiro steps (1963) given I, measure V Another way of providing a voltage standard NIST 1 Volt standard using 3020 JJs connected in series Microwave in

SQUID (Superconducting QUantum Interference Device) The current of a SQUID with area 1 cm

SQUID (Superconducting QUantum Interference Device) The current of a SQUID with area 1 cm 2 could change from max to min by a tiny H=10 -7 gauss! For junction with finite thickness

Super. Conducting Magnet Non-destructive testing MCG, magnetocardiography MEG, magnetoencephlography

Super. Conducting Magnet Non-destructive testing MCG, magnetocardiography MEG, magnetoencephlography

Super-sentitive photon detector semiconductor detector 科學人, 2006年 12月 Transition edge sensor superconductor detector

Super-sentitive photon detector semiconductor detector 科學人, 2006年 12月 Transition edge sensor superconductor detector