Summary Response Essay Richa Goyal Introduction The skill

Summary Response Essay -- Richa Goyal

Introduction The skill of writing good summary response writing is quite useful in college because it includes both reading and writing critically. The summary part of the writing involves the skills of drawing most important ideas from the text and rewriting them in one’s own words without including any minor details or examples. The response part of the essay shows your ability to compare/contrast, disagree/agree with the author etcetera. https: //www. dreamstime. com/stock-photography-feedback-word-letter-tilesresponse-opinion-answer-rating-words-to-illustrate-importance-customer-busine image 34058392

Author’s name and title of work Summary: What to include Main ideas Key features

Underline the main ideas Write the main ideas in your own words (change words and word order) Steps in summarizing Use transitions Include name of the author and name of the article Revise In “How the Civil War Began, " historian John Jones explains. . . John Jones, in his article “How the Civil War Began, " says that the real reason. . . "How the Civil War Began, " by historian John Jones, describes. .

Watch the video https: //owlcation. com/academia/How-to. Write-a-Summary-Analysis-and-Response. Essay

BASICS OF A GOOD SUMMAR Y A shortened version (one third to one fifth usually) - used to provide a brief overview of a larger text It has a topic sentence (paragraph) that states what is being summarized. Includes main ideas without supporting details or examples. It includes any final observations or recommendations made in the original piece. It is written in your own words and presents information without your opinions.

The most effective way I know to improve your writing is to do freewriting exercises regularly. At least three times a week. They are sometimes called "automatic writing, " "babbling, " or “jabbering" exercises. The idea is simply to write for ten minutes (later on, perhaps fifteen or twenty). Don't stop for anything. Go quickly without rushing. Never stop to look back, to cross something out, to wonder how to spell something, to wonder what word or thought to use, or to think about what you are doing.

Feedback According to XXX (YYYY), practicing free writing several times a week could improve writing skills. Freewriting involves writing continuously without stopping to think or edit.

First sentence Along with including the article's title and author's name, the first sentence should be the main point of the article. It should answer the question: What is this essay about? (thesis). Example: In "How the Civil War Began" by John Jones, the author argues that the real reason for the start of the Civil War was not slavery, as many believe, but was instead the clash of cultures and greed for cash. https: //owlcation. com/academia/How-to-Write-a-Summary-Analysis-and-Response-Essay

Rest of summary The rest of your essay is going to give the reasons and evidence for that main statement. In other words, what is the main point the writer is trying to make and what are the supporting ideas he or she uses to prove it? Does the author bring up any opposing ideas, and if so, what does he or she do to refute them? Here is a sample sort of sentence: is the issue addressed in “(article's title)” by (author's name). (Thesis) ______. The author’s main claim is ______ and his/her sub claim is ______. The author argues ______. Other people argue ______. The author refutes these ideas by saying ______. His/her conclusion is ______. https: //owlcation. com/academia/How-to-Write-a-Summary-Analysis-and-Response. Essay

https: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=q. Vzy 0 p. Q 1 p. Mc What does reaction or response to a text include? Response includes your critical evaluation of the text provided. You have to write why you agree or disagree with the writer explaining in detail the reasons for the way you feel. You could also analyse the problem, find solutions, make predictions while presenting your response. https: //www. liberaldictionary. com/response/

Response: What to include REACTION TO EACH MAIN POINT; POSITIVE, NEGATIVE OR NEUTRAL COMMENTS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ARGUMENT PERSONAL PRONOUNS/ OPINIONS QUESTIONS ABOUT THINGS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR PRIOR KNOWLEDGE

Response: Introduction üTransition: Restate author’s name and present thesis. üThesis summarizes your response to the author. üResponse could include agreement/disagreement, comparison/contrast and analysis. https: //teacherste. wordpress. com/2018/07/03/ielts-agree-ordisagree-essay/ https: //www. twinkl. ae/resource/t-t-4131 similarities-and-differences-table-with-lines https: //www. questionpro. com/to ur/text-analysis. html

Response: Body Paragraphs üThis is a very important part of writing. üEach paragraph in this part should have proper topic sentence and supporting details to validate the response. üQuotations, examples, details could be used to support your response. üYou can also quote or paraphrase from the original text to support your response. https: //www. uis. edu/cas/thelearninghub/writing/handouts/writing-processes/bodyparagraphs/

Response: Conclusion üParaphrase thesis or main idea of the response. http: //cpe 3. weebly. com/main-ideas. html

https: //www. washingtonpost. com/archive/opinions/1990/06/24/sex-lies-andconversation/01 cb 17 ba-1 af 7 -4 bf 4 -8 a 02 -3 d 1 b 6 c 11648 f/ • Instructions to the learners: • Read the essay by Deborah Tannen and write a summary response essay.

Feedback Summary In "Sex, Lies, and Conversation; Why is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other, " linguist Deborah Tannen argues that the problems of men and women in marriage often stem from the fact that they misunderstand what the other person is really trying to say. Tannen notes that her own research concluded that women's most frequent complaint in marriage was that their husbands did not listen to them, but that when she examined actual conversations, she found that the problem was not that men don't listen, but that they listen differently. Using her own research and that of other psychologists and sociologists, Tannen outlines the idea that men and women are raised to communicate differently. Little girls bond by sharing secrets and comforting each other by sharing stories, looking into one another's eyes, and becoming intimate through vulnerability. Boys, on the other hand, live in a hierarchical world where they need to struggle to find their place. Tannen's research shows that men do bond, but it is by negotiating in a more competitive environment where listening for too long makes them feel they are put down, and where they share problems in order to have a friend give them solutions or to be reassured the problem isn't important. These differences in expectations about close relationships, Tannen concludes, causes men and women to be frustrated in intimate relationships with the opposite sex, especially marriage. However, Tannen reassures us, learning about these communication differences can help couples to say what they really mean and hear what the other person is really trying to communicate. Tannen asks us to move away from psychological models of relationships which assign blame to one sex or the other and to instead move to a sociolinguistic understanding of communication between the sexes. Ideally, couples can adapt to one another's styles, but also understand when it is more effective to get some communication needs to be met by other friends. Ultimately, Tannen seeks to relieve the pressure on communication in marriage by giving couples more realistic expectations.

Feedback 2 Response The argument of "Sex, Lies, and Conversation" is one that Tannen has written about at length in her academic work and in her bestselling 1990 book, You Just Don't Understand: Men and Women in Conversation. This article was written for The Washington Post at the time of her book's publication and is a summary of her main ideas as well as an advertisement for her book. While this article doesn't fully explain how a couple can actually achieve that effective cross-cultural communication, Tannen does give a few specific tips. Tannen tells women not to assume that their husbands aren't listening just because they don’t give the expected non-verbal cues. Tannen's use of everyday examples, such as the talkative man at a dinner party who is silent at home makes her work accessible to her intended audience, a typical married couple. Moreover, Tannen for the most part avoids academic terms and presents her arguments in common language that her audience can understand, even ending with a pithy re-writing of an old favorite: "Like charity, successful cross-cultural communication should begin at home. ” After reading this article, I began to think about my own communication with my husband in the previous week. As a matter of fact, we had experienced a miscommunication which was exactly the type Tannen describes. Thinking the matter through from the lens of the differences in communication styles that this article presents actually helped me to clarify why my husband had been upset, and why my response had not satisfied it. Thus, this article makes the reader consider re-thinking their attitudes and actions towards communicating with the opposite sex.

Review of the key points Summary response essay has two parts: summary and critical response or critical evaluation of the reading text. Summary includes writing the main ideas in the text in new words with a proper citation. In response part, the writer describes which part of the reading he/she agrees and disagrees with and why.

Questions to ask for developing response üDoes the problem exist today? If yes, what are the causes and effects? üWhat could be done about it? üHave you experienced anything similar in life? üDo you agree or disagree with the author’s ideas? Why? https: //smallville. com. au/21 -great-questions-for-facilitators-part-2/

How is the essay organized? What is effective or ineffective about the organization of the essay? How does the author try to interest the reader? TEXT How well does the author explain the main claims? Are these arguments logical? Do the support and evidence seem adequate? Is the support convincing to the reader? Does the evidence actually prove the point the author is trying to make?

Who is the author? What does he or she know about this subject? What is the author's bias? Is the bias openly admitted? Does that make his or her argument more or less believable? Author Does the author's knowledge and background make her or him reliable for this audience? How does the author try to relate to the audience and establish common ground? Is it effective? How does the author interest the audience? Does she or he make the reader want to know more? Does the author explain enough about the history of this argument? Is anything left out?

Who is the reader? How would they react to these arguments? Reader How is this essay effective or ineffective for this audience? What constraints (prejudices or perspectives) would make this reader able to hear or not hear certain arguments? What is the exigence (events in this moment in time which affect the need for this conversation) that makes the audience interested in this issue?

More questions for response What is your personal reaction to the essay? What does this essay make you think about? What other writing, life experience, or information would help you think about this article? What common ground do you have with the author? How are your experiences the same or different from the author's and how has your experience influenced your view? What in the essay is new to you? Do you know of any information the article left out that is relevant to the topic? What in this essay made you rethink your own view? What do you like or dislike about the essay and/or the ideas in the essay? How much of your response is related to your personal experience? How much is related to your own worldview? How is this feeling related to the information you know? How will this information be useful for you in writing your own essay? What position does this essay support? Or where might you use this article in your essay?

Block format • Present the summary in a block of paragraphs, followed by the response in a block. • Response includes Intro/thesis Summary (two to three paragraphs) Response point 1 (agree/disagree) Response point 2 (agree/disagree) Conclusion

Point-by-point format • Introduce the essay with a short paragraph that includes your thesis. Then, each body paragraph summarizes one point and responds to it, and a conclusion wraps the essay up. • Intro/thesis Summary point one; response (agree/disagree) Summary point two; response (agree/disagree) Summary point three; response (agree/disagree) Conclusion

Thank You