Studying Photon Structure at ElectronIonCollider Xiaoxuan Chu Central

  • Slides: 24
Download presentation
Studying Photon Structure at Electron-Ion-Collider Xiaoxuan Chu Central China Normal University & Brookhaven National

Studying Photon Structure at Electron-Ion-Collider Xiaoxuan Chu Central China Normal University & Brookhaven National Lab

Outline • Introduction • Photon structure at EIC Ø Di-jet & Di-hadron method Ø

Outline • Introduction • Photon structure at EIC Ø Di-jet & Di-hadron method Ø Validating Monte Carlo with HERA data Ø Separation of direct and resolved process Ø Reconstruct Ø Jets from photon side & jets from proton side • Summary EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 2

Problem? λ HERA Q 2=Q 2 eff § Does the kink occur at the

Problem? λ HERA Q 2=Q 2 eff § Does the kink occur at the same Q 2 for e. A and for polarized ep § Photon structure as fct. of Q 2 EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 3

Introduction • Behavior of the exchanged photon: Ø Bare photon state Ø Hadronic photon

Introduction • Behavior of the exchanged photon: Ø Bare photon state Ø Hadronic photon state • Photon can be superposition of above states! • The “internal structure” of photons is a manifestation of quantum fluctuations Ø Photon splits into parton content • We measure the photon structure in quasi-real photoproduction Ø Low Q 2 events EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 4

Structure of the photon • Unpolarized photon structure: ar. Xiv: 9504004, ar. Xiv: 9710018,

Structure of the photon • Unpolarized photon structure: ar. Xiv: 9504004, ar. Xiv: 9710018, Eur. Phys. J. C 10, 363{372 (1999), DESY 97 -164 • Polarized photon structure: (critical input for ILC gg option) no data theory: Z. Phys. C 74, 641— 650 (1997) and ar. Xiv: 971125 • Photon Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs) HERA data: gluon density of the photon Ø Density of the partons Ø With large uncertainty • is defined as the momentum fraction of the parton from the photon EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 5

Resolved/direct process • “Direct process” category Ø Point-like photon(no substructure) Ø is close to

Resolved/direct process • “Direct process” category Ø Point-like photon(no substructure) Ø is close to 1 PGF: Di-jet produced • “Resolved process” category Ø Hadronic photon Ø is smaller than 1 Ø Di-jet/di-hadron production ➔ Separate di-jet(di-hadron) produced in resolved and direct processes, to get clear resolved process. Similar with pp collision EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 6

Di-jet / Di-hadron method • Di-hadron method Ø Two hadrons with highest • Di-jet

Di-jet / Di-hadron method • Di-hadron method Ø Two hadrons with highest • Di-jet method Ø Two jets with highest Reconstruct by using dijet/di-hadron as observables: • Parton densities in the photon can be extracted by measuring dijet cross section EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 7

PYTHIA simulation confronted with HERA data Kinematics cuts from HERA: 27 Ge. V× 820

PYTHIA simulation confronted with HERA data Kinematics cuts from HERA: 27 Ge. V× 820 Ge. V 0. 2<y<0. 83 Ejet 1 T, Ejet 2 T>7. 5 Ge. V , Ejet 1 T+Ejet 2 T>20 Ge. V, |Ejet 1 T-Ejet 2 T|/(Ejet 1 T+Ejet 2 T)<0. 25 |Δηjets|<1, 0<ηjet 1+ηjet 2<4 Strong correlation observed between and the input used in the simulation indicates the di-jet observable is ideal for reconstruction. EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 8

PYTHIA simulation confronted with HERA data Eur. Phys. J. 1998 C 1: 97 -107

PYTHIA simulation confronted with HERA data Eur. Phys. J. 1998 C 1: 97 -107 • • Reconstructing provides a good way to separate direct/resolved contribution( < 0. 75) Our simulation can match the existing data perfectly EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 9

 • Low Q 2 z = - 45 m tagger - 35 m

• Low Q 2 z = - 45 m tagger - 35 m EIC Advantages hadrons - 15 m electrons - 4 m 0 m 4 m 18 m 38 m R. Petti q pythia events with electron reconstructed in the tagger q acceptance for electrons down to Q 2~1 x 10 -5 Ge. V 2 EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 10

Photon structure at EIC • Statistic description 1. Basic parameters Parameter Set Ee 20

Photon structure at EIC • Statistic description 1. Basic parameters Parameter Set Ee 20 Ge. V Ep 250 Ge. V Q 2 <1 x 10 -9 - 0. 99 Proton PDF set CTEQ 5 Nevt(million) 25 σ (microbarn) 54. 7 Lint(pb-1) 0. 457 2. Di-jet produced in ep collision through hard scattering Resoled process Direct process: QCDC, PGF CTEQ 5 shows the best description of cross section at low Q 2 Resolved process qq → qq q qbar → gg gq(qg) → gq(qg) gg → q qbar gg → gg 79% EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 Direct process: QCDC, PFG γTq → qg γLq → qg γTg → q qbar γLg → q qbar 21% 11

Kinematics cuts for di-hadron/di-jet methods Di-hadron cut: 1. Two highest p. T, p. Ttrig>2

Kinematics cuts for di-hadron/di-jet methods Di-hadron cut: 1. Two highest p. T, p. Ttrig>2 Ge. V, p. Tasso>1 Ge. V 2. π/K/p Di-jet cut: 1. Two highest p. T, p. Ttrig>5 Ge. V, p. Tasso>4. 5 Ge. V 2. Inside the jet, stable particle p. T>250 Me. V 1. EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 12

h. LAB separation Di-hadron method • Di-jet method For both methods: Ø - At

h. LAB separation Di-hadron method • Di-jet method For both methods: Ø - At positive , especially resolved process. , the cross section is dominated by distribution of associate hadron/jet shows the same results EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 13

Reconstructing Di-hadron method Di-jet method • Both di-hadron and di-jet methods can help us

Reconstructing Di-hadron method Di-jet method • Both di-hadron and di-jet methods can help us separate resolved/direct process. • Di-jet method provides a better way to reconstruct EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 14

separation Di-hadron method If we choose different cut, how well can we separate resolved/direct

separation Di-hadron method If we choose different cut, how well can we separate resolved/direct processes: Di-jet Di-hadron Di-jet method • Small • Large : mainly resolved contribution : mainly direct contribution • Di-jet method shows better separation of resolved and direct photon EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 15

Di-jet cross section • The simulation shows the capability to measure the cross section

Di-jet cross section • The simulation shows the capability to measure the cross section for di-jet production, with high accuracy in a wide kinematic range at EIC and extract the photon PDFs from a global fit. EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 16

Parton-jet match • As we have known how to separate “direct” and “resolved” process,

Parton-jet match • As we have known how to separate “direct” and “resolved” process, then we measure jet kinematics in resolved process • Basic info about resolved process and how to tag di-jet back to two final partons In PYTHIA, beamparton, tgtparton • “Path” to do parton-jet match: Ø beamparton - one final parton - one jet of di-jet Ø tgtparton - another final parton - another jet of di-jet EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 Jet from photon side Jet from proton side 17

Geometric match: How to match di-jet with two final partons If Pseudorapifity matches, what

Geometric match: How to match di-jet with two final partons If Pseudorapifity matches, what about the angle correlation between parton and jet: What I used in the analysis Very well correlated! beamparton tgtparton ü match Two final partons EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 ü match Di-jet 18

Photon side jet and proton side jet hadrons electrons Separate jets from photon side

Photon side jet and proton side jet hadrons electrons Separate jets from photon side and proton side ~10% ~90% Divide into subprocesses qq-qq 31. 9% gq(qg)-gq(qg) 55. 8% EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 gg-gg 10. 4% 19

Summary • In resolved processes, photon has a hadronic structure Ø Di-jets produced in

Summary • In resolved processes, photon has a hadronic structure Ø Di-jets produced in resolved and direct process can be well separated at EIC • Photon PDFs can be extracted by reconstructing Ø is correlated with input Ø We can effectively access the underlying photon PDFs by measuring di-jet cross section in quasi-real photoproduction at EIC • Jet from photon side goes more to negative rapidity Ø Distinguish jets from beam side and target side • Will use LHC jet variables to separate gluon and quark jets statistically EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 20

backup Flavor match: beamparton – index 9 tgtparton – index 10 EIC Users' Meeting,

backup Flavor match: beamparton – index 9 tgtparton – index 10 EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 21

Quark jet and gluon jet Jet profile: R • Quark jet is more collimated

Quark jet and gluon jet Jet profile: R • Quark jet is more collimated than gluon jet Ø Choose a R cut with maximum difference value of jet profile, give possibility of types of jets EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 22

Di-jet cross section on different photon PDF sets LAC ACFGP SAS Question: Difference, especially

Di-jet cross section on different photon PDF sets LAC ACFGP SAS Question: Difference, especially when Pseudorapidity>1. 5, maily comes from quark jet or gluon jet from the photon? EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 23

Di-jet cross section on different photon PDF sets • Answer: It dominated by gluon

Di-jet cross section on different photon PDF sets • Answer: It dominated by gluon jet if we only consider contribution from photon side jet. • Conclusion: Gluon distribution of the photon is sensitive to di-jet cross section. Photon PDFs can be extracted by measuring the di-jet cross section in photoproduction process. EIC Users' Meeting, July 2016 24