STONE COLUMN YZ WHAT IS STONE COLUMN stone

  • Slides: 35
Download presentation
STONE COLUMN YZ

STONE COLUMN YZ

WHAT IS STONE COLUMN? stone columns are a ground improvement technique to improve the

WHAT IS STONE COLUMN? stone columns are a ground improvement technique to improve the load bearing capacity of the soil. The stone column consists of crushed coarse aggregates of various sizes. The ratio in which the stones of different sizes will be mixed is decided by design criteria. 2

WHAT IS STONE COLUMN? (CONT. ) Vibro-Replacement Stone Columns extends the range of soils

WHAT IS STONE COLUMN? (CONT. ) Vibro-Replacement Stone Columns extends the range of soils that can be improved by vibratory techniques to include cohesive soils. Densification and/or reinforcement of the soil with compacted granular columns or “stone columns” is accomplished by either top-feed or the bottom-feed method. Cohesive, mixed and layered soils generally do not densify easily when subjected to vibration alone. The Vibro-Replacement Stone Column technique was developed specifically for these soils, effectively extending the range of soil types that can be improved with the deep vibratory process. With Vibro-Replacement Stone Columns, columns of dense, crushed stone are designed to increase bearing capacity, reduce settlement, aid densification and mitigate the potential for liquefaction, and improve shear resistance. 3

THE VIBRO-REPLACEMENT STONE COLUMN PROCESS! 1. Reduces shallow foundation settlement. 2. Increases bearing capacity,

THE VIBRO-REPLACEMENT STONE COLUMN PROCESS! 1. Reduces shallow foundation settlement. 2. Increases bearing capacity, allowing reduction in footing size. 3. Mitigates liquefaction potential. 4. Provides slope stabilization. 5. Permits construction on fills. 6. Permits shallow footing construction. 7. Prevents earthquake-induced lateral spreading. 4

STONE COLUMN CONSTRUCTION METHODS! The two primary methods of Vibro Stone Column construction are:

STONE COLUMN CONSTRUCTION METHODS! The two primary methods of Vibro Stone Column construction are: 1. Wet, Top Feed Method (Replacement and Displacement). 2. Dry, Bottom Feed Method (Displacement). 5

STONE COLUMN CONSTRUCTION (CONT. ) **Wet, Top Feed Method (Replacement and Displacement): In this

STONE COLUMN CONSTRUCTION (CONT. ) **Wet, Top Feed Method (Replacement and Displacement): In this technique, jetting water is used to remove soft material, stabilize the probe hole, and ensure that the stone backfill reaches the tip of the vibrator. This is the most commonly used and most cost-efficient of the deep vibratory methods. However, handling of the spoil generated by the process may make this method more difficult to use on confined sites or in environmentally sensitive areas. 6

STONE COLUMN CONSTRUCTION (CONT. ) **Top-Feed Construction Method: 7

STONE COLUMN CONSTRUCTION (CONT. ) **Top-Feed Construction Method: 7

STONE COLUMN CONSTRUCTION (CONT. ) **Dry, Bottom Feed Method (Displacement): This technique uses the

STONE COLUMN CONSTRUCTION (CONT. ) **Dry, Bottom Feed Method (Displacement): This technique uses the same vibrator probes as standard Vibro-Replacement Stone Columns, but with the addition of a hopper and supply tube to feed the stone backfill directly to the tip of the vibrator. Bottom Feed Vibro-Replacement is a completely dry operation where the vibrator remains in the ground during the construction process. The elimination of flushing water in turn eliminates the generation of spoil, extending the range of sites that can be treated. Treatment is possible up to a depth of 80 feet and is not inhibited by the presence of groundwater. 8

DESIGN OF STONE COLUMNS USING HEINZ J. PRIEBES METHOD Basic principle Load distribution and

DESIGN OF STONE COLUMNS USING HEINZ J. PRIEBES METHOD Basic principle Load distribution and lateral support from the stone column & surrounding stiffened ground on an area basis are considered to give an improvement factor. The improvement factor indicates increase in compression modulus and the extent to which the settlement is reduced by the column ground improvement. The design method refers to the improving effect of stone columns in a soil which is otherwise unaltered in comparison to the initial state. i. e. the installation of stone columns densities the soil between.

The following idealized conditions are assumed in the design: • The column is based

The following idealized conditions are assumed in the design: • The column is based on a rigid layer • The column material is uncompressible • The bulk density of column and soil is neglected. Hence, the column can not fail in end bearing and any settlement of the load area results in a bulging of the column which remains constant all over its length

DETERMINATION OF THE BASIC IMPROVEMENT FACTOR no : improvement factor A : unit cell

DETERMINATION OF THE BASIC IMPROVEMENT FACTOR no : improvement factor A : unit cell area Ac : The area of collumn

RELATION BETWEEN THE IMPROVEMENT FACTOR N 0, THE RECIPROCAL AREA RATIO A/AC AND THE

RELATION BETWEEN THE IMPROVEMENT FACTOR N 0, THE RECIPROCAL AREA RATIO A/AC AND THE FRICTION ANGLE OF THE BACKFILL MATERIAL, ΦC.

CONSIDERATION OF COLUMN COMPRESSIBILITY The compressibility of the column material can be considered in

CONSIDERATION OF COLUMN COMPRESSIBILITY The compressibility of the column material can be considered in using a reduced improvement factor n 1 which results from the formula developed for the basic improvement factor, n 0 when the given reciprocal area ratio A/AC is increased by an additional amount of Δ(A/AC). The Reduced Improvement Factor is calculated by using the following equation, n 1

VARIATION OF ADDITIONAL AMOUNT ON THE AREA RATIO WITH THE RATIO OF THE CONSTRAINED

VARIATION OF ADDITIONAL AMOUNT ON THE AREA RATIO WITH THE RATIO OF THE CONSTRAINED MODULI

CONSIDERATION OF THE OVERBURDEN 1)The neglect of the bulk densities of columns and soil

CONSIDERATION OF THE OVERBURDEN 1)The neglect of the bulk densities of columns and soil means that the initial pressure difference between the columns and the soil which creates bulging, depends solely on the distribution of the foundation load P on columns and soil, and that it is constant all over the column length. 2)The consideration of external loads the weights of the columns Wc and of the soil Wc which possibly exceed the external loads considerably decreases the pr. Difference and the bulging is reduced. 3)The pressure difference is a linear parameter in the derivations of the improvement factor, the ratio of the initial pressure difference and the one depending on depth expressed as depth factor fd - delivers a value by which the improvement factor n 1 increases to the final improvement factor n 2 = fd × n 1.

THE DEPTH FACTOR

THE DEPTH FACTOR

VARIATION OF INFLUENCE FACTOR, Y FOR DIFFERENT VALUES OF FRICTION ANGLES

VARIATION OF INFLUENCE FACTOR, Y FOR DIFFERENT VALUES OF FRICTION ANGLES

SHEAR VALUES OF IMPROVED GROUND The shear resistance from friction of the composite system

SHEAR VALUES OF IMPROVED GROUND The shear resistance from friction of the composite system can be determined by using the following equation: The cohesion of the composite system depends on the proportional to the loads using the following equation

PROPORTIONAL LOAD ON STONE COLUMNS FOR DIFFERENT VALUES OF FRICTION ANGLES.

PROPORTIONAL LOAD ON STONE COLUMNS FOR DIFFERENT VALUES OF FRICTION ANGLES.

SETTLEMENT OF IMPROVED GROUND The design ensues from the performance of an unlimited column

SETTLEMENT OF IMPROVED GROUND The design ensues from the performance of an unlimited column grid below an unlimited load area. The total settlement which results for this case at homogeneous conditions, is readily to determine on the basis of the foregoing description with n 2 as an average value over the depth d is given by the following equation: Wherw: p : stress of foundation load; d: improvement depth; Ds : constrained modulus of soil The settlement of the ground with out improvement is 25. 1 cm which is more than that of settlement with improvement of 5. 1 cm.

VARIATION OF SETTLEMENT RATIO WITH D/D RATIO OF SINGLE FOOTING

VARIATION OF SETTLEMENT RATIO WITH D/D RATIO OF SINGLE FOOTING

VARIATION OF SETTLEMENT RATIO WITH D/D RATIO OF STRIP FOOTING

VARIATION OF SETTLEMENT RATIO WITH D/D RATIO OF STRIP FOOTING

BEARING CAPACITY OF IMPROVED GROUND Safety factor against bearing capacity of the soil can

BEARING CAPACITY OF IMPROVED GROUND Safety factor against bearing capacity of the soil can be determined using the following equations Factor of Safety Against Bearing capacity= σ0 f/P

DESIGN EXAMPLE Design stone columns for an embankment with the following properties: Top width

DESIGN EXAMPLE Design stone columns for an embankment with the following properties: Top width of embankment= 5. 0 m with 1: 1 slope on both sides. Surcharge on embankment=20 k. Pa; Unit Wt. of embankment fill= 20 KN/m 3 with depth of stone column= 6. 0 m. Given friction angle of column material= 40 o; Cohesion=20 kpa; Friction angle of soil= 0 degrees; μs=1/3; Column diameter=0. 75 m; Unit Wt. of Soil=16 KN/m 3. Square Foundation is on embankment (B=1, 5)

STEP 1) BASIC IMPROVEMENT FACTOR(NO) GIVEN BY: Kac= Tan 2(45 - c/2)= 0. 217

STEP 1) BASIC IMPROVEMENT FACTOR(NO) GIVEN BY: Kac= Tan 2(45 - c/2)= 0. 217 Area of Column, Ac= 0. 785*0. 752 =0. 441 Area of unit Cell, A= 1. 5*1. 5= 2. 25 μs=0. 33 By substituting the above values in no, we get basic improvement factor as, no= 2. 30

STEP 2) DETERMINE REDUCED IMPROVEMENT FACTOR(N 1) The compressibility of the column material can

STEP 2) DETERMINE REDUCED IMPROVEMENT FACTOR(N 1) The compressibility of the column material can be considered in using a reduced improvement factor n 1 which results from the formula developed for the basic improvement factor n 0 when the given reciprocal area ratio A/AC is increased by an additional amount of Δ(A/AC). Assuming constrained modulus Ratio, Dc/Ds=100, we get ΔA/Ac=0. 05 and substituting, we get. Reduced Improvement factor, n 1=2. 28

STEP 3) THE DEPTH FACTOR ƒd=2. 01. ƒd = Depth factor due to overburden.

STEP 3) THE DEPTH FACTOR ƒd=2. 01. ƒd = Depth factor due to overburden. n 2=improved factor (with overburden constraint) n 2=ƒd*n 1 =2. 01*2. 28 =4. 58

STEP 4) DETERMINE IMPROVED SHEAR VALUES m’=0. 561; Tan =(2*0. 578*tan 40 +(1 -

STEP 4) DETERMINE IMPROVED SHEAR VALUES m’=0. 561; Tan =(2*0. 578*tan 40 +(1 - 0. 578)*Tan 0) = 47 deg rees The cohesion of the composite system depends on the proportional to the loads using the following equation. c‘= (1 -0. 561)*20 C’=8. 44 k. Pa

STEP 6) DETERMINE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL. Factor of safety against bearing

STEP 6) DETERMINE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL. Factor of safety against bearing capacity=104. 226/60. 0=1. 73