Status of the Proposed PIXE Project John Arthur

  • Slides: 19
Download presentation
Status of the Proposed PIXE Project John Arthur SLAC Photon Instrumentation for X-ray Experiments

Status of the Proposed PIXE Project John Arthur SLAC Photon Instrumentation for X-ray Experiments May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

What is the PIXE project How will PIXE be organized May 10, 2005 PIXE

What is the PIXE project How will PIXE be organized May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

Formulation of the Scientific Case for an X-Ray FEL A long history of scientific

Formulation of the Scientific Case for an X-Ray FEL A long history of scientific workshops dating back to 1992 1999 Leone Panel: Develop a compelling and rigorous scientific case October, 1999: Formation of LCLS Scientific Advisory Committee March, 2000: DOE Charge to LCLS SAC: Describe ~5 experiments for LCLS startup, including feasibility estimates and optics/detector technology October 24 -25, 2000: Presentation of 5 experiments to BESAC May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

Stöhr and Shenoy create First Experiments document t= t=0 Femtochemistry Dan Imre BNL Nanoscale

Stöhr and Shenoy create First Experiments document t= t=0 Femtochemistry Dan Imre BNL Nanoscale Dynamics in Condensed Matter Brian Stephenson ANL Atomic Physics Phil Bucksbaum Univ. of Michigan Plasma and Warm Dense Matter Richard Lee LLNL Structural Studies on Single Particles and Biomolecules Janos Hajdu Uppsala Univ. Aluminum plasma classical plasma G =10 dense plasma G =100 high density matter 10 - 4 10 -2 1 10 2 10 4 Density (g/cm-3) SLAC REPORT 611 (2000) May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status X-ray Laser Physics Jerry Hastings BNL John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

Process for Defining LCLS Instruments 2003 Call for Letters of Intent to build instruments

Process for Defining LCLS Instruments 2003 Call for Letters of Intent to build instruments and do science with LCLS 2004 32 LOI’s received July 2004 SAC examines LOI’s, groups them into 5 Science Thrust Areas Fall 2004 SLAC and DOE BESAC discuss how to build instrumentation for Thrust Areas May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS Science Thrust Areas Atomic, Molecular, and Optical (AMO) science High-energy-density (HED) science Diffraction

LCLS Science Thrust Areas Atomic, Molecular, and Optical (AMO) science High-energy-density (HED) science Diffraction studies of stimulated dynamics Coherent-scattering studies of nanoscale fluctuations Nano-particle and single-molecule (non-periodic) imaging May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

BES approach to the Thrust Areas AMO science will be included in LCLS construction

BES approach to the Thrust Areas AMO science will be included in LCLS construction project HED science deemed to be outside the mission of BES May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

Proposed PIXE Scope Build instruments for hard x-rays that address the 3 remaining Thrust

Proposed PIXE Scope Build instruments for hard x-rays that address the 3 remaining Thrust Areas within BES mission Include one additional instrument, to address the soft-x-ray portions of stimulated dynamics and coherent imaging Thrust Areas May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

PIXE Instruments Ultrafast x-ray studies of laser-induced transient states of matter Nano-particle and single-biomolecule

PIXE Instruments Ultrafast x-ray studies of laser-induced transient states of matter Nano-particle and single-biomolecule (non-periodic) imaging Nanoscale equilibrium dynamics in condensed matter Soft x-ray imaging and dynamics May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

PIXE Detector Development LCLS experiments need new detector technology Dual development strategy for fast

PIXE Detector Development LCLS experiments need new detector technology Dual development strategy for fast 2 -d detectors Several technologies look promising, no clear leader LCLS will pursue one strategy PIXE will try a different technology Both prototypes should be ready by 2009 May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

PIXE Phased Approach First LCLS light may come in mid-2008 Budget will not support

PIXE Phased Approach First LCLS light may come in mid-2008 Budget will not support building 4 instruments by 2008 Phased approach 2 instruments in phase 1 sufficient functionality by mid-2008 to begin experiments phase 1 instruments can support early work in all four areas complete phase 1 while phase 2 is ramping up remaining instruments in phase 2 begin phase 2 after 2008 complete all work in 2012 May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

A PIXE instrument costs $12 -15 M Typical PIXE “instrument” + PEOPLE May 10,

A PIXE instrument costs $12 -15 M Typical PIXE “instrument” + PEOPLE May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status Controls (including laser timing)+Computers Slits Flight path Valves/windows/pumps KB focusing system (1 µm and sub-µm options) X-ray pulse split+delay with table Crystal monochromator with table Diffractometer with table Optical table for laser Laser PPS Laser system (10 m. J Ti: sapphire plus OPA) Laser diagnostics X-ray diagnostics 2 d detector John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

DOE BES project requirements PIXE will be a major item of equipment (MIE) project

DOE BES project requirements PIXE will be a major item of equipment (MIE) project Not a line-item in the DOE budget Can include construction funding and R&D funding Must build distinct instruments, separate from what LCLS builds Assume all new rules for BES project management apply May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

PIXE organization Keith Hodgson SSRL Director Jerry Hastings SSRL Asst. Dir for LCLS Science

PIXE organization Keith Hodgson SSRL Director Jerry Hastings SSRL Asst. Dir for LCLS Science Teams John Arthur PIXE Project Director TBD PIXE Project Chief Engineering & Development 4 -5 Engineers 2 -3 Designers Budget ES&H PMCS Database Purchasing Administration Inst #1 Instrument Scientist Inst #2 Instrument Scientist Inst #3 Instrument Scientist Inst #4 Instrument Scientist May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

Role of the LCLS Science Teams are responsible for preparing physics requirements for PIXE

Role of the LCLS Science Teams are responsible for preparing physics requirements for PIXE instruments Teams have designated leaders Quarterly meetings at SLAC with leaders Start weekly teleconferences soon Yearly general meeting (Oct) Web site is up May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

PIXE WBS Draft, to level 3 4 instruments May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status

PIXE WBS Draft, to level 3 4 instruments May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status OPC John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

Instrument PIXE WBS partial, to level 5 Major project function (design, fab) Instrument subsection

Instrument PIXE WBS partial, to level 5 Major project function (design, fab) Instrument subsection (lasers, detectors) May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status Major component (monochromator) John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

$millions Proposed PIXE funding profile Possibility of some funding in 2006 Total = $50

$millions Proposed PIXE funding profile Possibility of some funding in 2006 Total = $50 M-$60 M May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu

Summary The funding profile constraints on the PIXE project, along with the LCLS schedule,

Summary The funding profile constraints on the PIXE project, along with the LCLS schedule, indicate that a phased approach is needed Two instruments in Phase 1, two in Phase 2, along with a detector development program Funding for this project is lean, especially in the first years Strong support from the Science Teams will be needed May 10, 2005 PIXE Project status John Arthur jarthur@slac. stanford. edu