Status of the CPP Outline Organization CPP kickoff

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
Status of the CPP Outline: • Organization • CPP kick-off meeting • Tasks •

Status of the CPP Outline: • Organization • CPP kick-off meeting • Tasks • Provisional time schedule www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

Organization • In charge: B. G. , help from K. L. (April => Aug.

Organization • In charge: B. G. , help from K. L. (April => Aug. ) • Define the tasks • Organize a kick-off meeting • Task allocation • Start the highest priority task • Collaborative tools • Look for external collaborations • INRIA • FSP • PRISM • Open. Cascade www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

CPP kick-off meeting • Held on March 15 th at Cadarache (10 am to

CPP kick-off meeting • Held on March 15 th at Cadarache (10 am to 5 pm) • Fluctuating # of attendees: 15 p, then 10 p and 14 p • Problems with the remote connections: Garching, Frascati and Ljubjana • Members, tools, web site • Open discussion: tasks, priorities, … • Minutes of the meeting www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

Tools • Intensive use of the e-mail • Pros: asynchronous, alarm, it works •

Tools • Intensive use of the e-mail • Pros: asynchronous, alarm, it works • Cons: not available to a general audience, no archive • Advert for the EFDA web site Private CPP forum Instant Messaging www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

Tasks • Requirements • Modellers evaluation • Performance issues • Metadata, codes interface: J.

Tasks • Requirements • Modellers evaluation • Performance issues • Metadata, codes interface: J. Lister • Resources issues • Automatic components scheduling • Verification www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

Requirements What? -standard, specific, architecture that lasts y t i r rio p t

Requirements What? -standard, specific, architecture that lasts y t i r rio p t es h g i H Who? -currently: mainly done by a local team J. F. Artaud, J. M. Travere, K. Laugier, B. Guillerminet + M. Stanojevic + inputs from CPP members + validation by ITM-TF Must be done by the ITM-TF itself? When? -2 months (Mid-March up to Mid-May) -1 month for the validation phase d e t r a t S Resources? -one ½day workshop/week (remote connection) -e-mail, forum www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

Modellers evaluation What? -Which: Salome, … input from CPP members, FSP, … -Salome, …

Modellers evaluation What? -Which: Salome, … input from CPP members, FSP, … -Salome, … based on requirements, then integration of Cronos as a component y t i r -investigate the limits rio p h Hig Who? -J. F. Artaud for Cronos, 1 or 2 p from LGLS, B. Guillerminet + “call for participation” When? -May to November -December: choice 8 d e r t p r A a t : s g n y i l t t r e a e P m t Nex Resources? -full time work (not continuously) www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

Performance issues What? • Range of resources: cpu, memory, network, … • // &

Performance issues What? • Range of resources: cpu, memory, network, … • // & distributed computing? Who? • Lars Eriksson, H. Parrat, R. Hatzky(? ), T. Soddeman(? ), G. Bracco(? ), DCP(? ) When? • April-May: resources • Fall 05 + year 06: Grid, // y t i r rio H p h ig y t i r rio p w Lo Resources? • High perf. Computer (TERA, …), Grid engine, … www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

Metadata, codes interface What? • Convert a code into a component • Share Data

Metadata, codes interface What? • Convert a code into a component • Share Data and Codes => Web Services? Who? y • J. Lister, M. Tran(? ), K. Bosak(? ), T. Soddemann(? ) t i r o i r • DCP, G. Huysmans(? ) h p Duration? • To be estimated Resources? • e-mail, forum • Benchmark the Web Service principle • Could depend on the chosen modeller(? ) Hig d e t ar St www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

Resources issues Goal: • Tools for the version handling (CVS? ) • Login, security,

Resources issues Goal: • Tools for the version handling (CVS? ) • Login, security, … • Simulations output • Codes library, code server, … Who? • currently: J. Kreck(? ), K. Bosak(? ) y t i r rio d e m ter p e iat In Duration? • To be estimated Resources? • Computer, data storage, … • e-mail, forum • collaborations with IMPs, DCP www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

Automatic components scheduling Goal: • User’s assistant to build the workflow • Orchestration by

Automatic components scheduling Goal: • User’s assistant to build the workflow • Orchestration by an expert system Who? • currently: L. Dada, B. Guillerminet(? ) Duration? • To be estimated y t i r rio p w Lo Resources? • e-mail, forum • Use the Metadata to build the simulation run or to launch the appropriate code www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

Verification What? • Verification & validation are done for each code (IMP & DCP)

Verification What? • Verification & validation are done for each code (IMP & DCP) • But the coupling of codes and the complexity could add errors (a small effect could be amplified). How to handle this task? Who? • K. Bosak(? ), DCP y t i r rio p w Lo When? • After the development of verification procedures in DCP Resources? • e-mail, forum • Collaborations with DCP and IMPs www. efda-taskforce-itm. org

Time schedule June 05 06 March 06 June 06 07 • Organization • Requirements

Time schedule June 05 06 March 06 June 06 07 • Organization • Requirements • Performance • Modellers evaluation • Metadata • Version handling • 1 st release • Code server • Grid • Verification CPP • Automatic scheduling www. efda-taskforce-itm. org