SPM Course Zurich 2008 VoxelBased Morphometry Practical Ged

SPM Course – Zurich 2008 Voxel-Based Morphometry Practical Ged Ridgway For SPM 5, using data from www. oasis-brains. org Any problems, please email Ged. Ridgway@gmail. com

Background • Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease affecting over 24 million people world-wide (Ferri et al, Lancet, 2005) • At present, researchers know of no single cause, nor of a cure, though prototype drugs are in development • Histopathology (microscopic analysis of post-mortem tissue samples) reveals “amyloid plaques” and “neurofibrillary tangles”, with varying distribution through the brain, that changes with disease severity

Background • MRI has the potential to find systematic differences between the brains of AD patients and healthy elderly controls in vivo • MRI may have potential to advance our understanding of the disease, to allow earlier diagnosis, and to track disease progression or drug response over time

Introduction • In this practical we will perform Voxel Based Morphometry with SPM 5 to determine local patterns of significant grey-matter differences between AD patients and healthy controls • The data come from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies, www. oasis-brains. org

Preliminary SPM Setup • Edit spm_defaults – defaults. stats. maxmem = 2^29; % 2^29 bytes = 500 MB • This will make things much faster later – defaults. analyze. flip = 1; • LEFT/RIGHT FLIPPING IS IMPORTANT! • SPM shows images with what it thinks is anatomical-right on screen-right – you can check this is correct by comparing SPM’s display with the www. oasis-brains. org website after browsing to one of the cross-sectional images

Data • We will consider a subset of the complete crosssectional OASIS dataset (which contains over 400 subjects), with 30 controls and 30 AD patients • There is a comma-separated-variables spreadsheet oasis_subset. csv which you can open in Excel, or in MATLAB using oasis_read_csv. m [H C] = oasis_read_csv; (H{n} contains the nth column heading, C{n} contains the data for the nth column) • The first 30 rows are controls, the next 30 are patients

Getting the data • If you want to download some of the data, you can get individual subjects from www. oasis-brains. org – browse to the cross-sectional study, and particular subject-ID – you only need the “RECONSTRUCTIONS” (about 44 MB per subject) • To get the complete subset, you need – – The xnat tools from www. xnat. org The MATLAB functions oasis_read_csv. m and oasis_get_xnat. m A “comma-separated variables” spreadsheet, like oasis_subset. csv Note that you probably want to use oasis_get_xnat with a –proc argument, see “help oasis_get_xnat” in MATLAB

Reorientation • Newly downloaded OASIS data is not correctly oriented for SPM (0, 0, 0 mm is way outside the brain) • The script oasis_reorient. m should fix this – Check reg with spm 5/templates/T 1. nii afterwards! – Right click the image and select reorient this image from the check reg context menu if you need to make manual adjustments (you don’t need the AC perfectly at 0, 0, 0, or the PC perfectly on the same x and z coords, but you do need rough alignment of the subject and template in order for the segmentation step to work well

Tissue Segmentation • • Newly downloaded data needs segmenting Click the “segment” button in the top-left window Select your newly downloaded t 88_gfc images as the data Under “output files” – Choose “modulated normalised” grey matter, and “none” for white matter and CSF – Don’t output bias corrected – Don’t do clean-up • Leave the custom options. Click run (it should take 20 -60 mins)

Spatial Smoothing • • Click the smooth button in the top-left window For images to smooth, select the 60 mwc 1 images Leave the data type as “same” Set the Full-Width at Half-Maximum (FWHM) of the Gaussian kernel to 10 mm isotropic ([10 10 10]) – You might like to explore different values

Creating a mask • First use imcalc with the data matrix option to produce an average of your smwc 1 images, with the expression mean(X) • Then use imcalc (without data-matrix) and the expression i 1>0. 1 to threshold the average, giving a binary mask that includes all voxels with more than 10% probability on average of being GM – (This interpretation is not completely true, since the data are modulated, but it’s close enough for the mask to be reasonable)

Statistical Parametric Mapping • We will now perform voxel-wise statistics on the segmentations (this is the essence of Voxel-based morphometry) • Choose “basic models” from the top-left window • Under design, select “two sample t-test” • Enter the controls (smoothed smwc 1 images) as “group 1 scans”, and the AD patients as group 2 • Leave “independence” as yes; set “variance” to unequal – Equal variance probably won’t make much difference, but you could try if you are interested – With equal variance, the resultant SPM t-statistic at a particular voxel would match a simple two-group t-test in Excel or SPSS, etc. , if you extracted the voxel intensity from each smoothed image • Leave “grand mean scaling” and “ANCOVA” as no

Covariates • Under covariates, add a new covariate • Use estimated Total Intracranial Volume (e. TIV) – This is the 10 th column of the oasis_subset. csv spreadsheet – You might like to test using gender instead or as well, or not using a covariate at all. For gender (or orther boolean/categorical variables) you need indicator variables, e. g. a binary female=1, male=0 variable (not ‘M’ or ‘F’!) • Use oasis_read_csv to get the variable in the workspace, then evaluate this variable as the “vector” (the values should appear in the window) and specify e. TIV (or Female, etc. ) as the name • Leave interactions as none and centering as overall mean

Masking and globals • Under masking, leave threshold masking as none, implicit masking as yes, and then under explicit mask select the mask you created earlier • Leave global calculation and global normalisation

Checking the design • Select the output directory as twogroup_tiv_s 10 – (or other covariate and smoothing options) – (SPM won’t make this directory; ensure it exists first) • Click run (this step should only take a few seconds) • A design summary will appear, and various aspects may be checked

GLM Estimation • Now we are ready to fit the model we just designed • Click the estimate button from the top-left window, and select SPM. mat in the output directory you specified • Wait for the estimation to complete. . .

Results • Once estimation has finished, click the results button • Select the SPM. mat in your results directory • Click “define new contrast”, enter the name as hc>ad and the contrast vector as [1 -1], then “done” • Don’t mask with other contrasts • Leave the title as hc>ad • Choose FWE correction and leave the p-value at 0. 05 • Leave the extent threshold at 0

Glass-brain MIP • You should see a “glass-brain” Maximum Intensity Projection of the significant voxels • Click the “whole brain” button under the p-values tab of the bottom-left (interactive) window, this should add a table of results below your glass brain • Click the SPM-Print button in the menu bar of the right -hand (graphics) window, choose other print file and give the name mip. ps – Overleaf is an example with 13 mm smoothing. . .

Presenting results • Interpreting complicated 3 D datasets can be difficult • The glass brain display is one of several options • We would also like to overlay the significant regions on the smoothed average image s 10 subjmean. img or your equivalent (see the masking and globals slide earlier) • While the glass brain is showing, click the “save” button near the bottom-right of the bottom-left window, and enter the filename “spm. T_thresh”

Presenting results • Produce a figure showing the spm. T_thresh image overlaid on the mwc 1 average – Use SPM’s check registration – Display the average, right click and choose “blobs -> add coloured image” from the context menu, then select spm. T_thresh – Use the spm-print button to store the figure with the filename overlay. ps • You might also like to investigate “slover” – slover(‘basic_ui’); % will get you started…

Looking at global GM • The function get_totals. m is a simple script to find the total (probabilistic) volume of a segmentation in ml • Use this function on all control and patient mwc 1 images, collecting the volumes into a 60 -vector – Note that results should be almost identical if you used native c 1 images or unsmoothed mwc 1 images, thanks to the properties of the smoothing kernel and thanks to the modulation process • You might like to produce plots of GM volume against covariates from the oasis_subset. csv spreadsheet, using the MATLAB plot command – E. g. age, e. TIV, and MMSE (separately) – You can distinguish the patients from controls with different colours, e. g. • plot(age(1: 30), total. GM(1: 30), ‘b’, age(31: 60), total. GM(31: 60), ‘r’); – Can you see any interesting correlations? – You can use MATLAB’s corrcoef to quantify the relationships (r and p)

Looking at global GM • How does mean GM volume compare to mean e. TIV? (i. e. on average what fraction of the brain is GM? ) • Produce a scatter plot of e. TIV against gender – plot(0, e. TIV(female==0), 'b+', 1, e. TIV(female==1), 'ro'); – title('e. TIV by gender'); ylabel(‘e. TIV (ml)’); xlim([-0. 5 1. 5]) – set(gca, 'Xtick', [0 1]); set(gca, 'Xtick. Label', {'male', 'female'}); • You might like to repeat this for GM volume, and for GM volume divided by e. TIV, exploring how the sexes differ in these scatter plots

VBM adjusted for global differences • Repeat your previous VBM statistical analysis, but this time use the global GM volume you have just computed as a covariate instead of the e. TIV/gender covariate that you used before. – Use twogroup_total. GM_s 10 as the output directory • Think about the differences between adjusting for e. TIV or gender compared to global GM volume – Is AD likely to cause or correlate with decreased skullsize? Certainly not as strongly as it causes global GM reduction

Final points • Both global volume and VBM show differences between controls and AD patients • Each approach has relative advantages and disadvantages with regard to – Ease of interpretation – Potential contribution to disease understanding – Ease of use for classifying potential disease carriers and for tracking disease progress over time – Power to detect a range of disease progressions