SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy DCS Preliminary
SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy DCS Preliminary Design Review Sean C. Casey USRA Senior Scientist Lead Scientist for Science Support 3/7/2000 DCS PDR at RIT
SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy DCS PDR Panel John Bieging, University of Arizona Keith Bryant, Raytheon Bob Hovde, USRA Jim Jackson (Chair), Boston University Deborah Levine, IPAC David Weintraub Vanderbilt University 3/7/2000 DCS PDR at RIT
SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Review Policy SOFIA science support review policy is to facilitate the development of world class instruments. The review policy is guided by past experiences of other ground based and space based facilities. The review board is responsible for making judgments and recommendations concerning the review content. The board chairman is responsible for supervising the review, mediating discussions, meeting the review objectives, and maximizing the value-added contribution of the review board. Following the review, the board meets to discuss findings, review and assign RFAs, and prepare a draft report. The board rejects of adopts either in part of in-full all submitted RFAs from the review. The chairman prepares a final report of concerns and recommendations. The review board chairman prepared a final report of the review and delivers the report to the observatory directory within two weeks of the review. The final report is distributed to all the meeting attendees by the observatory director following receipt from the board chairman. 3/7/2000 DCS PDR at RIT
SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Review Board PDR Charter • • Statement of requirements Verification plans for compliance with requirements Design based on established practice – Components based on standards – Use of tested designs – COTS Major system design elements modules, interactions, interfaces 3/7/2000 • • • Design tradeoff considerations – Justification of chosen implementation – Relationship with established methods Discussion of key design details Outline of planned implementation process Major concerns and risks – Deferred Scope Open items and resolution plans DCS PDR at RIT
SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy FSI Critical Design Review Charter • • Operational requirements and verification compliance Summary of major derived design specifications and constraints Major changes since PDR Interface details and status of agreements Selected design details Critical component status Selected manufacturing details and plans Configuration control plan (HW/SW 3/7/2000 • • • Maintenance plans (HW/SW) Documentation status Breadboard and prototype test status and results Test plans for the deliverable units Operational features and constraints Spare provisions Support equipment requirements, provisions, and plans Schedule, budget, and flow plan status Major concerns, open items, and plans for resolution DCS PDR at RIT
SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy SOFIA FSI Review Process • Required of all SOFIA facility instruments – Independent review panel • Review board submits recommendations to observatory director • Director and Instrument PI derive agreement • Science Support follows up on agreement 3/7/2000 DCS PDR at RIT
SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Request for Action Item Form Presenter: Section: Comments: Request for Action: Author: 3/7/2000 Date: DCS PDR at RIT
SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Technology Development aboard SOFIA Sean Casey USRA 3/7/2000 DCS PDR at RIT
SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy NASA Programs at TRL’s 1 – 9___ CETDP Missions SOFIA IUE/IRAS/HST/ISO Astrophysics Support Proposals, Observ. , Pipeline, Archives Propose, and use science instruments and archives Technology Development FSI Program I PI Program Propose, Build, and Use Science Instruments SI Program Astrophysics 2000’s 1990’s PI’s 1 2 3 4 5 6 1970 -80’s 7 8 II FTEs ? ? KAO ‘ 72 -’ 94 Principal Investigator Program “The Good Ol’e Boy’s Club” 9 1990’s DCS Space Flight Programs (TRL-9) Historical FTE Involvement: KAO ‘ 72 -’ 94 TRL KAO Program (TRL 3. 5 -5) SOFIA Program (TRL 3. 5 -7) 1970 -80’s Observatory Support Science Center Personnel (IUE/IPAC/STSCI/CFA/SSMOC) GI’s motion III 1990’s KAO ‘ 72 -’ 94 GI’s 1970 -80’s General Investigator (GI) Program “The Broader Science Community” • As IUE/IPAC/ST Sc. I/EUV/CFA/etc. have shown: – The strength of the general investigator programs depend upon the strength and resources of the associated Observatory Science Centers – Science Centers must necessarily invoke different solutions for science instrument programs working at differing TR levels 3/7/2000 DCS PDR at RIT
- Slides: 9