Snapshot Tutorial INTRODUCTION TO LINCOLNDOUGLAS DEBATE LINCOLNDOUGLAS DEBATE

Snapshot Tutorial INTRODUCTION TO LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE

LINCOLN/DOUGLAS DEBATE History and Structure "A man never tells you anything until you contradict him. " -George Bernard Shaw

LINCOLN/DOUGLAS DEBATES OF 1858 The 1858 election campaign for U. S. Senate for state of Illinois Stephen A. Douglas against a then unknown Abraham Lincoln accepted the nomination with the famous lines: “A house divided against itself cannot stand. ' I believe this Government cannot endure permanently half-slave and half-free. "

LINCOLN/DOUGLAS DEBATES OF 1858 CONT’D They participated in 7 debates, 3 hours apiece, in 7 different cities in Illinois People came from all over the state to watch them debate in crowds of nearly 15, 000 Lincoln and Douglas presented sharply opposing viewpoints on the issue of slavery and the legal rights of blacks This issue addressed a problem that was dividing the nation and threatening the continued existence of the Union Douglas won the Senate position, but Lincoln went on to win the presidency in 1860.

LINCOLN/DOUGLAS DEBATE STRUCTURE This style of debate has two sides. The side which favors the proposition is called the Affirmative position, and the side that opposes the proposition is called the Negative position. This style is very reliant on time and good behavior/manners.

OVERVIEW Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a VALUE debate, meaning it is a debate about what ought to be rather than specific policy. It is usually a topic regarding the conflict between the rights of the individual opposed to the rights of the larger society. The topic changes every two months; it is chosen by the National Forensic League.

OVERVIEW A round of Lincoln-Douglas Debate is the debate of one person from one school arguing against a person from a different school. At a debate tournament, each student will debate at least 3 -4 times. The larger the tournament, the more rounds will be guaranteed.

OVERVIEW During a typical tournament, debaters will argue both sides of the topic. Usually, each debater will be assigned the affirmative side for two rounds and the negative side on two other rounds. A Lincoln-Douglas debate round lasts about 45 minutes. The times for the various speeches are very structured, as are the purposes of the speeches.

What do we want to do? On your own OR with a partner? Timings will differ based on our choice.

IF IN PARTNERS: (38 MINUTES) (1 AC) - 5 minutes (1 NC) -5 minutes Cross-examination of 2 Affspeaker by the Neg- 2 minutes (2 NC) -5 minutes Cross-examination of 1 Neg speaker by the Aff - 2 minutes (2 AC) - 5 minutes Cross-examination of 1 Aff speaker by the Neg - 2 minutes Cross-examination of 2 Neg speaker by the Aff - 2 minutes 1 st Affirmative Rebuttal (1 AR) - 3 minutes Negative Rebuttal (NR) - 5 minutes 2 nd Affirmative Rebuttal (2 AR) - 2 minutes Get 4 minutes of prep IF ALONE (16 MINUTES) Affirmative Constructive - 4 minutes Neg Cross-examination - 2 minutes Negative Constructive -4 minutes Aff Cross-examination 2 minutes Negative Rebuttal (NR) - 2 minutes Affirmative Rebuttal (AR) - 2 minutes **Get 3 minutes of prep

POSSIBLE VALUE PREMISES Justice, Morality, Social Welfare, Individual Welfare, or Liberty. http: //mrwaddell. net/4 n 6/docs/congress/deba te%20&%20 congress%20 tips. pdf

TIME LIMITS 6 minute Affirmative Constructive (AC) 3 minute Negative Cross Examination 7 minute Negative Constructive/Rebuttal (NC) 3 minute Affirmative Cross Examination (questions/answers) 4 minute Affirmative Reconstructive/Rebuttal (1 AR) 6 minute Negative Reconstructive/Rebuttal (NR) 3 minute Affirmative Reconstructive/Rebuttal/Crystallization (2 AR) It helps to memorize: "6 - 3 - 7 - 3 - 4 - 6 - 3"

CLOSER LOOK AT THE SPEECHES 6 minute Affirmative Constructive. This speech is prepared ahead, rehearsed and should be perfectly timed. It is a presentation of the affirmative's position and establishes his/her stance. 3 minute Negative Cross Examination. The Negative asks for clarification, asks for repetition of certain points, and tries to set up the affirmative to admit damaging information. 7 minute Negative Constructive/ Rebuttal. This speech really has two parts: The first part is a written, rehearsed speech that builds the negative case and is about four minutes long. In the second part, the negative must attack his/her opponent's points. The attack takes the last three minutes. 3 minute Affirmative Cross Examination. Now it's the affirmative's turn to question the negative, asking for clarification and trying to lead him/her down an ivycovered path to destruction. 4 minute Affirmative Reconstructive/Rebuttal. The affirmative doesn't have much time here, so she/he has to talk fast. She/he must go down the flow (outline) of the argumentation, hitting any arguments against her/his own case and then attacking each of her/his opponent's arguments. Again, two parts: Rebuild and Attack. 6 minute Negative Reconstructive/ Rebuttal. This speech has three parts: Rebuild, Attack and Crystallize: about two minutes to rebuild any arguments against the negative's own case; two minutes to attack the affirmative; and two minutes to summarize the voting issues for the judge. 3 minute Affirmative Reconstructive/Rebuttal. This is a very short speech--time only to argue the most important points, attack the negative's voting issues, and crystallize the affirmative's own voting points.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION FOR CASE-WRITING Our Team subscribes to publishers who create DEBATE BRIEFS A Brief is a collection of evidence, arguments, current topic analysis, definitions, etc. Briefs are helpful, but remember that other teams may also have these collections Evidence can also be found on the internet, but only use CREDIBLE sources (NY Times, WA Post, etc. )

FORMULATING DEBATE CASES You will need to write TWO speeches: the affirmative (6 min. ) that says that the resolution is true and the negative (3 -4 min) that says that the resolution is false. You will use your affirmative speech in two of your debates and your negative speech in the other two debates.

FORMULATING DEBATE CASES Step One: The Resolution. The resolution is a statement of the topic of the debate. The entire debate is a test of the validity of this statement. Therefore, wording and semantics are crucial. Each important word must be defined from different angles. After a brief opening paragraph using the resolution as thesis statement, or in the case of the negative, its antithesis, you will state your definitions. Step Two: The Value Premise. Remember that we said that Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a VALUE debate about what ought to be, right? Each debate speech will center on a value that you choose as the cornerstone of your position. I know this seems very, very vague. Let’s clarify using a simple analogy:

FORMULATING DEBATE CASES Pretend the Resolution is: Resolved: A cheeseburger ought to be valued above spaghetti. vs. Before you can start arguing about which of these two yummies is the more valuable, you need to figure out what yardstick to use to measure them: Is it Good Taste? Nutritional Value? Ease of Preparation? Aesthetic Presentation? The yardstick you choose is called your Value Premise. Naturally, you will choose the yardstick that you think will help you win! If you're debating for the cheeseburger, you might take "Good Taste" as the most important value; if you're taking the side of spaghetti, you might claim that "Nutrition" must be the value by which to measure foods. In this debate, the affirmative might claim that if food doesn't taste good, no one will eat it. The negative might claim that nutrition is prime and that if it's not good for the body, it's not good food. From this example, you can see that the debate should go back and forth.

FORMULATING DEBATE CASES The value is achieved through certain Criteria. After you state your value premise, you will name the criterion or criteria that you will use to achieve the value. For example, for the value of Nutrition, your criterion might be the Four Food Groups, as set up by the U. S. Dept of Health, Education and Welfare. Step Three: State arguments as main points. You will need two or three main points. The cheeseburger affirmative might be: Value: Common Good Criterion: Quality of Life Contention One: The cheeseburger provides one of the basic needs of mankind, according to Maslow's hierarchy of basic needs. Contention Two: The cheeseburger provides nutrition from all four food groups. Contention Three: The cheeseburger provides advantages that the negative cannot provide, including portability and ease of use.

FORMULATING DEBATE CASES The spaghetti negative might be: Value: Life Criterion: Nutrition Contention One: Spaghetti provides a high standard of nutrition needed for life. Contention Two: A cheeseburger is fat-filled and therefore fails to provide nutrition. Step Four: Use evidence to back up each point. Evidence can consist of quotes, reasoning, or analogy. Step Five: Find a good opening for the speech. This can be an apt quote, startling statistics, or interesting example. Step Six: Time the speech. (Six minutes for the affirmative exactly. About three to four minutes for negative. )

AC (6 min. speech) V: C: 1 2 3 Notes on cross ex period NC (3 -4 min. speech) V: C: 1 2 1 AR Rebuild your case and answer attacks (2 min. ) NR Attack (2 min. ) Rebuild (2 min. ) AR Brief attack of NR position NC (2 nd part) Attack on AC (line by line, 3 -4 min. ) 1 AR Attack NC line by line (2 min. ) Crystallize the round Crystallize Give VOTERS (2 min. ) Give VOTERS Brief support of Aff side FLOWING The judge and both debaters will outline everything that is said in the round. This outline is called in debate jargon a FLOW. The paper is called a FLOW CHART. Each person's flow chart will look a bit different, but it should be neat and easily read.

TIME TO DEBATE! You should already have preflowed your own speech on your flowchart before going into round. In the few minutes before the round starts, you can organize your flowchart, take out any note cards you might need, and focus your attention on your particular stance. The affirmative will stand, make eye contact with the judge to make certain he/she is ready, and read his/her speech. Debaters typically keep their own time on a stop watch At the end of the speech, he/she will say, "I now stand ready for cross examination. " The negative will rise, stand beside the affirmative and begin to ask cross examination questions. They do not look at each other. Instead they look at the judge.

TIME TO DEBATE! Each debater will have 4 minutes of Preparation Time that they can take whenever they like. Usually the negative takes 2 minutes his/her cross-ex and then another 2 minutes his second speech. Usually the affirmative takes 2 minutes before each of his/her rebuttal speeches. The negative will then ROAD MAP for the judge what he/she intends to do. He/she will say, "I will first read the negative case and then attack my opponent's ridiculous position. " (Not really-- don't really say "ridiculous"--just think it. ) Then he/she will read the four minute speech. Next he/she will say, "I will now turn to my opponent's case. " Turning to the flow pad, he/she will attack all the points made by the affirmative, showing why his case is better. Any points he fails to attack are considered dropped and are given to the other side. MOST COMMON NOVICE ERROR: Failing to attack your opponent's case!