Smart levee monitoring and flood decision support system

























- Slides: 25
Smart levee monitoring and flood decision support system: reference architecture and urgent computing management Bartosz Baliś, Tomasz Bartynski, Marian Bubak, Daniel Harezlak, Marek Kasztelnik, Maciej Malawski, Piotr Nowakowski, Maciej Pawlik, Bartosz Wilk AGH University of Science and Technology Department of Computer Science Kraków, Poland ICCS 2015, Reykjavik, Iceland
Agenda • Motivation • ISMOP project: IT system for smart levee monitoring and flood decision support • Holistic approach to urgent computing management
Motivation • Predict levee failures using smart levees • Typical flood scenario in Lesser Poland region: flood threat due to passing water wave • High water levels lasting up to several weeks • Need for urgent computing in large-scale scenarios
Levee monitoring: traditional approach
Smart levees Sensor monitor • temperature • pore pressure
Data analysis (1): anomaly detection trend anomaly
Data analysis (2): threat estimation via numerical modeling • Prediction of levee response to certaing water levels in current external conditions • Numerical models require geotechnical and geophysical levee examination
ISMOP project overview ISMOP: an IT system for smart levee monitoring and flood decision support • Construction of an experimental levee • Design and installation of sensors • Innovative telemetry system • Model- and data-driven modeling of levee behavior • Monitoring and decision support system
ISMOP experimental smart levee Size: 200 mx 50 mx 4 m, 4 types of material 1200 sensors (temperature and pore pressure) Two optic fibre sensors
Controlled flooding experiments
Urgent computing scenario • Assess flood threat risk for large area (50+ km) of levees • Compute results by a specified deadline • Provide levee health maps for all levee sections
ISMOP IT system for smart levee monitoring and flood decision support
Decision support workflow Multiple tiers of data analysis, activated as alert level rises • Anomaly detection: 1 st indication about a potential problem • Threat estimation: more in-depth analysis of anomalous sections in order to assess threat of levee failure (e. g. levee breach simulations) • Risk assessment: estimate impact of levee breach (e. g. simulations of inundation, crowd behavior)
Decision support workflow: implementation
Holistic approach to urgent computing management System reconfiguration loop Isolated approach Holistic approach
System management • SLA (service-level agreement): requried level of quality of service the system has to deliver • SLAs become optimization objectives • SLAs vary depending on system mode – Normal mode: conserve energy, save costs – Urgent mode: high performance, high accuracy of data measurement and analysis, deadlines
IT system for smart levees: reference architecture and objective functions OPC (Operating Cost) SLT (System Lifetime) EE (Energy Efficiency) DPI (Data Processing Interval) DPT (Data Processing Time) DAT (Data Access Time) DTI (Data Transmission Interval) DMI (Data Measurement Interval)
Configurable properties
Service profiles in normal and urgent modes Service profile defines: • SLAs: functional constraints imposed upon the objective functions • Trade-offs: which objectives should be preferred?
Objective functions models • Based on experimental research and literature review, we have created approximate models of three objective functions: – Function q 1: OPC (Operating Cost) – Function q 2: EE (Energy Efficiency) – Function q 3: TML (Timeliness – aggregated measure of system performance and responsiveness) where qi: (s, c) [0, 1] s: system configuration (a vector of configuration options for all system components) c: system context (e. g. weather conditions) 0: minimal possible value, 1: maximal possible value
Decision support workflow: implementation
Holistic urgent computing management: algorithm
Results Pareto-optimal solutions, normal mode
Results Pareto-optimal solutions, urgent mode
Conclusion • Holistic urgent computing management leads to more optimized system configuration than the isolated approach Future work: • Evaluate public cloud services for urgent computing