Small or mediumscale focused research project STREP proposal

Small or medium-scale focused research project (STREP) proposal ICT Call 7 FP 7 -ICT-2011 -7 FP 7 : Accessible Computer Vision (ACCOV) Small or medium scale focused research project (STREP) Date of preparation: 01. 2011. Work programme topic addressed: ICT 2011. 2. 1 Cognitive Systems and Robotics (a) Name of the coordinating person: Radović Petar, Nikola Ranković Department of Computer Science Faculty of Mathematics University of Belgrade Petar Radović petar. radovic@gmail. com Nikola Ranković nikola. s. rankovic@gmail. com 1 / 18

Table of contents ØProject partners ØProject abstract ØConcept and objectives ØThe overall strategy of the work plan ØGantt chart ØWork package list ØDeliverable list ØList of milestones ØSummary effort table ØPert chart ØEthical issues Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 2 / 18

Project partners Participant no. Participant organisation name Part. short name Country 1 (Coordinator) University of Belgrade, Mathematical Faculty, http: //www. matf. rs MAT Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, http: //www. etf. g. ac. rs Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, http: //www. tue. nl ETF Serbia TUE Netherlands 4 Softkinetic, http: //www. softkinetic. com SK Belgium 5 Goal. Europe, http: //www. goaleurope. com GE Germany 6 MEDIApro, http: //www. mediapro. es MEDIA Spain 7 Philips Research, http: //www. research. philips. com PR Netherlands 8 Our Space d. o. o, http: //www. ourspace. si SPACE 3 Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 Slovenia 3 / 18

Project abstract � Latest � Goal: advances in Computer Vision ◦ Affordable ◦ Easily accessible � Potential to transform � Open access is the key � Final product: ◦ HW Prototype of a standard ◦ SDK Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 4 / 18

Concept and objectives � Developing a computer vision system � Along with software development kit � A new standard � Possibly mass-produced at a low cost Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 5 / 18

existing technology existing algorithms development of new tools & integration means for manufacture of affordable devices end products SDK development High-level representation of concepts and objectives Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 6 / 18

The overall strategy of the work plan � The ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ project is organized in 9 work packages: WPO Project management WP 1 Development of Use Cases WP 2 Development of System Architecture WP 3 Hardware Details WP 4 Software Details WP 5 Proof of Concept Implementation WP 6 Testing WP 7 Dissemination WP 8 SDK release to third-parties Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 7 / 18

FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AVG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN Gantt chart Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 8 / 18

Work package list Work package No WP 0 WP 1 Work package title Type of activity Lead partic no. Lead partic. Personshort name months Start month End month 5 Project management Development of Use Cases Development of System Architecture MGT RTD 1 1 GE SK 72 10 M 1 M 12 M 1 RTD 1 TUE 16 M 1 M 4 WP 3 WP 4 WP 5 Hardware Details Software Details Proof of Concept Implementation RTD RTD 2 2 2 ETF, PR MAT, SK SK, PR 12 16 10 M 2 M 5 M 3 M 5 WP 6 Testing of the ACCOV system RTD/DEM 1 MAT, ETF, TUE 120 M 6 M 9 WP 7 Informing the scientific and technical environment, investors and market Public release of the SDK TOTAL DEM 1 MEDIA 60 M 6 M 12 RTD/DEM 2 PR, MAT 60 376 M 9 M 12 WP 8 Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 9 / 18

Deliverable list (WP 0) Del. no. D 0. 1 D 0. 2 D 0. 3 D 0. 4 D 0. 5 D 0. 6 Deliverable name Minutes from each Steering Committee meeting Project handbook including quality management plan (at the kick-off meeting) Periodic reports at periods specified in the Grant Agreement Signed Consortium Agreement Audit certificates for each participant at times stated in the contract Final reports at the conclusion of the project (final activity report, final management report, supplementary final reports and a report on distribution between participants of the final payment) WP no. Nature Dissemination level Delivery date (projected month) WP 0 R PU M 1 WP 0 R PU WP 0 R R PU PU M 1, M 3, M 6, M 9, M 12 WP 0 R PU M 12 Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 M 1, M 6, M 12 10 / 18

Deliverable list (WP 1 – WP 6) D 1. 1 D 1. 2 D 3. 1 D 3. 2 D 4. 1 D 4. 2 D 4. 3 D 5. 1 D 5. 2 D 6. 1 D 6. 2 D 6. 3 Top level Use Case diagrams Detailed Use Case diagrams Architecture Specification Report on HW built into the system Report on Communication system built into the system Procedure details Algorithmic details Report on SW built into the system CMMI and system schemes Documented code Report on testing results (MAT) Report on testing results (ETF) Report on testing results (TUE) WP 1 WP 2 WP 3 O O R R PU PU RE PU M 1 M 2 M 3 WP 3 R PU M 3 WP 4 R R R PU PU PU M 2 M 3 WP 5 WP 6 R R R CO PU PU M 5 M 6, M 7, M 8, M 9 WP 6 R PU M 6, M 7, M 8, M 9 Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 11 / 18

Deliverable list (WP 7 – WP 8) D 7. 1 D 7. 2 Dissemination Plan Project promotional materials WP 7 R R RE PU M 6, M 8, M 10, M 12 D 7. 3 E-bulletin/newsletter released WP 7 R PU M 6, M 7, M 8, M 9, M 10, M 11, M 12 D 7. 4 2 Workshop reports WP 7 R PU M 6, M 12 D 7. 6 WP 7 R PU M 12 D 7. 7 Report on participation on international conferences Scientific articles D 8. 1 D 8. 2 D 7. 5 D 7. 8 2 Seminar reports WP 7 R PU M 6, M 12 WP 7 R PU M 12 SDK Checklist WP 8 R RE M 10, M 11, M 12 SDK published online (and possibly updated) WP 8 O PU M 11, M 12 Articles published in local media WP 7 R PU Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 M 7, M 11 12 / 18

List of milestones Milestone number Milestone name Work package(s) involved Expected date Means of verification M 0. 1 Kick-off meeting WP 0 M 1 Minutes from kick-off meeting M 0. 2 Consortium agreement signed WP 0 M 1 Consortium Agreement with partner signatures M 0. 3 Project shut-down – all deliverables achieved WP 0 M 12 Final deliverables report M 1 Finished Use Cases WP 1 M 1 Use Case documentation M 2 System architecture defined HW details defined and clarified WP 2 M 3 Architecture specification WP 3 M 3 HW report M 4 SW details defined and clarified WP 4 M 3 SW report M 5 System tested in real life scenarios WP 5 M 5 CMMI and code documentation M 6 System performance test WP 6 M 6 -M 10 Reports on the testing results M 7 SDK Version 1 released WP 8 M 11 SDK published online M 3 Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 13 / 18

Summary effort table Partic. no. short name WP 0 WP 1 WP 2 WP 3 WP 4 WP 5 WP 6 WP 7 WP 8 Total person months 1 MAT 2 1 4 0 12 0 38 2 26 85 2 ETF 2 0 4 8 0 0 38 2 5 59 3 TUE 2 0 8 0 0 0 38 2 5 55 4 SK 2 1 0 0 4 5 0 4 4 20 5 GE 58 0 0 0 2 0 60 6 MEDIA 2 0 0 0 42 0 44 7 PR 2 0 0 4 0 5 6 4 20 41 8 SPACE 2 8 0 0 0 2 0 12 72 10 16 12 16 10 120 60 60 376 Total Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 14 / 18

WP 0 WP 1 WP 3 WP 6 WP 5 WP 2 WP 8 WP 4 WP 7 Pert chart Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 15 / 18

Ethical issues � No direct ethical, legal, social and safety issues � May arise with the training data � Consent asked beforehand � “I CONFIRM THAT NONE OF THE ABOVE ISSUES APPLY TO MY PROPOSAL” Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 16 / 18

Questions? Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 17 / 18

Petar Radović, Nikola Ranković, 1/4/2011 18 / 18