Slideshow Project DOI 10 1682JRRD 2012 0222 SP

  • Slides: 5
Download presentation
Slideshow Project DOI: 10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222 SP Upper-limb activity in adults: Referent values

Slideshow Project DOI: 10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222 SP Upper-limb activity in adults: Referent values using accelerometry Ryan R. Bailey, MSOT, OTR/L; Catherine E. Lang, PT, Ph. D This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Bailey RR, Lang CE. Upper-limb activity in adults: Referent values using accelerometry. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 50(9): 1213– 22. http: //dx. doi. org/10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222

Slideshow Project DOI: 10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222 SP • Aim – Characterize hours of

Slideshow Project DOI: 10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222 SP • Aim – Characterize hours of upper-limb (UL) activity. – Examine potential modifying factors of UL activity: • Sedentary activity, cognitive impairment, depression, comorbidities, cohabitation status, age. • Relevance – Capacity for UL function may not translate into realworld activity; therefore, activity should also be assessed together with clinical measures of capacity. • Accelerometry can quantify UL activity outside clinic. This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Bailey RR, Lang CE. Upper-limb activity in adults: Referent values using accelerometry. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 50(9): 1213– 22. http: //dx. doi. org/10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222

Method Slideshow Project DOI: 10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222 SP • 74 community-dwelling adults: –

Method Slideshow Project DOI: 10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222 SP • 74 community-dwelling adults: – Wore accelerometers on bilateral wrists for 25 h. – Provided information on modifying factors. This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Bailey RR, Lang CE. Upper-limb activity in adults: Referent values using accelerometry. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 50(9): 1213– 22. http: //dx. doi. org/10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222

Results Slideshow Project DOI: 10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222 SP • Dominant UL activity duration:

Results Slideshow Project DOI: 10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222 SP • Dominant UL activity duration: – Mean 9. 1 ± 1. 9 h. • Ratio of activity between nondominant and dominant ULs: – 0. 95 ± 0. 06 h. • Decreased hours of dominant UL activity associated with increased time spent in sedentary activity. • No other factors associated with hours of dominant UL activity. This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Bailey RR, Lang CE. Upper-limb activity in adults: Referent values using accelerometry. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 50(9): 1213– 22. http: //dx. doi. org/10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222

Conclusion Slideshow Project DOI: 10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222 SP • These data can help

Conclusion Slideshow Project DOI: 10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222 SP • These data can help clinicians: – Establish outcome goals for patients given preimpairment level of sedentary activity. – Track progress during UL rehabilitation. This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Bailey RR, Lang CE. Upper-limb activity in adults: Referent values using accelerometry. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 50(9): 1213– 22. http: //dx. doi. org/10. 1682/JRRD. 2012. 0222