Skin Lesion James Warneke MD University of Arizona

  • Slides: 38
Download presentation
Skin Lesion James Warneke, MD University of Arizona

Skin Lesion James Warneke, MD University of Arizona

Mr. Smith § Patient is a 64 year-old man with a history of a

Mr. Smith § Patient is a 64 year-old man with a history of a mole on his chest that has been present for years, but has recently grown is size. The mole has not bleed.

History What other points of the history do you want to know?

History What other points of the history do you want to know?

History, Mr. Smith Consider the Following § Characterization of symptoms § Temporal sequence §

History, Mr. Smith Consider the Following § Characterization of symptoms § Temporal sequence § Alleviating / Exacerbating factors: § Pertinent PMH, ROS, MEDS. § Relevant family hx. § Associated signs and symptoms

History, Mr Smith § Characteristics of mole • Change in color • Nodular areas

History, Mr Smith § Characteristics of mole • Change in color • Nodular areas § Family History of melanoma § History of sun exposure and sunburns § History of previous atypical moles

What is your Differential Diagnosis?

What is your Differential Diagnosis?

Differential Diagnosis Based on History § § § Dysplastic Nevus Malignant Melanoma Basal Cell

Differential Diagnosis Based on History § § § Dysplastic Nevus Malignant Melanoma Basal Cell Carcinoma Squamous Cell Carcinoma Junctional Nevus Actinic Keratosis

Physical Examination What would you look for?

Physical Examination What would you look for?

Physical Examination, Mr. Smith § General: fair skin and blue eyes § Skin: Multiple

Physical Examination, Mr. Smith § General: fair skin and blue eyes § Skin: Multiple moles and evidence or solar skin damage on face and arms • Large mole on anterior chest with • Asymmetry, border irregularity, color variation and diameter greater than 6 mm • Lymph nodes – none palpable in axilla, neck or groin

Physical Examination

Physical Examination

Interventions at this point?

Interventions at this point?

Biopsy of Lesion § § Biopsy thickest area Biopsy should be down to subcutaneous

Biopsy of Lesion § § Biopsy thickest area Biopsy should be down to subcutaneous fat Biopsy entire lesion if small Large lesions should have punch biopsy or wedge § Orient extremity incisions in axial direction so re-excisions can be axial

Would you like to revise your Differential Diagnosis?

Would you like to revise your Differential Diagnosis?

Results of Biopsy § Melanoma What is important to check on the pathology report?

Results of Biopsy § Melanoma What is important to check on the pathology report?

Biopsy Results § Pattern of Melanoma • Superficial spreading – most common • Nodular

Biopsy Results § Pattern of Melanoma • Superficial spreading – most common • Nodular – vertical growth • Acral lentiginous – nails, palms and sole of foot, usually have in-situ precursor • Lentigo Maligna – in-situ melanoma in sun exposed area of the face and back of hand

Biopsy Results § Breslow’s Thickness – measured with an optic micrometer § Clark’s Level

Biopsy Results § Breslow’s Thickness – measured with an optic micrometer § Clark’s Level • • • I II IV V In-situ Papillary dermis Superficial reticular dermis Deep reticular dermis Subcutaneous fat

Biopsy Results § Ulceration of Epithelium § Other Factors – deep margin involved with

Biopsy Results § Ulceration of Epithelium § Other Factors – deep margin involved with melanoma, regression, lymphocytic infiltration.

Biopsy Results of Mr. Smith Superficial spreading melanoma with areas of nodular invasion Breslow’s

Biopsy Results of Mr. Smith Superficial spreading melanoma with areas of nodular invasion Breslow’s thickness 2. 5 mm Clark’s level IV Non-ulcerated Deep margin free of melanoma

Laboratory and X-ray What blood test should be ordered? What X-ray studies are indicated?

Laboratory and X-ray What blood test should be ordered? What X-ray studies are indicated?

Laboratory and X-ray Serum LDH is indicated for lesions deeper than 1. 0 mm

Laboratory and X-ray Serum LDH is indicated for lesions deeper than 1. 0 mm PA and Lateral Chest X-ray for lesions deeper than 1. 0 mm

Laboratory and X-ray of Mr. Smith LDH is within normal limits CXR shows no

Laboratory and X-ray of Mr. Smith LDH is within normal limits CXR shows no evidence of metastatic disease

Further Management What should be done next?

Further Management What should be done next?

Management Surgical Excision § How wide of an excision should be done? § When

Management Surgical Excision § How wide of an excision should be done? § When should a lymph node biopsy be planned?

Management of Mr. Smith § Margin of excision should be 2. 0 cm from

Management of Mr. Smith § Margin of excision should be 2. 0 cm from all borders of the pigmented lesion • • Lesions <1. 0 mm 1. 0 cm margins Lesions 1. 0 -2. 0 mm 1. 0 -2. 0 cm margins Lesions >2. 0 mm 2. 0 cm margins The depth of the excision is to the underlying fascia

Management of Mr. Smith § For an acceptable cosmetic result, an ellipse of skin

Management of Mr. Smith § For an acceptable cosmetic result, an ellipse of skin is usually excised with length 2. 5 -3. 5 times the width. In this patient the lesion is wide, and the ellipse would be 6 cm X 15 cm § To close this defect primarily, the lateral edges are undermined for 2 -3 cm to allow the skin to stretch

Evaluation of Lymph Nodes § Lesions <1. 0 mm do not need lymph nodes

Evaluation of Lymph Nodes § Lesions <1. 0 mm do not need lymph nodes biopsied § Lesions >1. 0 mm thickness should have sentinel lymph node biopsy § All lesions which have an enlarged palpable lymph node in an adjacent lymph node basin, should have that lymph node biopsied

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy § Lymphscintigraphy with Tc 99 radiolabeled to colloid is done

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy § Lymphscintigraphy with Tc 99 radiolabeled to colloid is done day of procedure to detect lymph drainage and to use intraoperatively with the gamma probe § Lymphazurin blue dye is injected into the dermis next to the melanoma to visually detect the sentinel lymph node

Marking of Lymph Basin With Lymphscintigraphy in Mr. Smith

Marking of Lymph Basin With Lymphscintigraphy in Mr. Smith

Injection of Lymphazurin Blue Dye in Mr. Smith

Injection of Lymphazurin Blue Dye in Mr. Smith

Evaluation of Mr. Smith’s Lymph Nodes

Evaluation of Mr. Smith’s Lymph Nodes

Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Mr. Smith § Sentinel lymph node biopsy found two lymph

Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Mr. Smith § Sentinel lymph node biopsy found two lymph nodes which where blue § Both blue lymph nodes were hot with the handheld gamma probe § Pathology by routine histology and immunohistochemistry did not detect any melanoma in the lymph nodes

What Stage is Mr. Smith’s Melanoma?

What Stage is Mr. Smith’s Melanoma?

Staging of Mr. Smith’s Melanoma § Primary Tumor (T) 2. 5 mm with no

Staging of Mr. Smith’s Melanoma § Primary Tumor (T) 2. 5 mm with no § ulceration is T 3 a § Regional Lymph Nodes (N) no regional node metastasis is NO § Metastasis (M) none is MO § Stage is IIA T 3 a NO MO

Prognosis § What is the estimated 10 year survival of Mr. Smith?

Prognosis § What is the estimated 10 year survival of Mr. Smith?

10 Year Survival of Mr. Smith § Melanoma T 3 a with NO has

10 Year Survival of Mr. Smith § Melanoma T 3 a with NO has a 10 year survival of 65% § With the inclusion of sentinel lymph node biopsy, the micrometastatic nodes with melanoma will have a worse prognosis of 50%, and the negative sentinel nodes will have a increased survival to 80 -90 %

Questions?

Questions?

Summary of Melanoma § § § 54, 200 new melanomas per year in US

Summary of Melanoma § § § 54, 200 new melanomas per year in US 7600 deaths from melanoma per year in US 1 in 57 white males 1 in 81 white females 89% 5 -year survival for 1992 -1998

Acknowledgment The preceding educational materials were made available through the ASSOCIATION FOR SURGICAL EDUCATION

Acknowledgment The preceding educational materials were made available through the ASSOCIATION FOR SURGICAL EDUCATION In order to improve our educational materials we welcome your comments/ suggestions at: feedback. PPTM@surgicaleducation. com