Simulation of Short Circuit Flow Paths and Transient

  • Slides: 33
Download presentation
Simulation of Short Circuit Flow Paths and Transient Conditions to Understand Vulnerability of Public

Simulation of Short Circuit Flow Paths and Transient Conditions to Understand Vulnerability of Public Supply Wells to Contamination in the High Plains Aquifer, York, Nebraska Brian Clark Matt Landon Leon Kauffman George Hornberger 4/12/2005

Take-Home Messages • Wellbores drilled through confining units can act as “short circuits” •

Take-Home Messages • Wellbores drilled through confining units can act as “short circuits” • Transient stresses provide opportunities for pulses of flow • Combination of transient stresses and wellbores through confining units can allow contaminants to lower layers

Study Background USGS National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program

Study Background USGS National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program

Study Background USGS National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program NAWQA topical study: Transport of Anthropogenic

Study Background USGS National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program NAWQA topical study: Transport of Anthropogenic and Natural Contaminants (TANC) to public supply wells

Study Background USGS National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program TANC goal: determine controls on movement

Study Background USGS National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program TANC goal: determine controls on movement of contaminants to public supply wells

Study area

Study area

Study area !. RCRA, LST, NPDES !. Water / wastewater !. Landfill / livestock

Study area !. RCRA, LST, NPDES !. Water / wastewater !. Landfill / livestock !. Superfund Potential contaminant sources

Study area Recharge zones

Study area Recharge zones

Study area Recharge zones Multi-node pumping wells

Study area Recharge zones Multi-node pumping wells

Study area FP 5 FP 4 FP 3 FP 1 Recharge zones Observation wells

Study area FP 5 FP 4 FP 3 FP 1 Recharge zones Observation wells

Study area FP 5 FP 4 FP 3 FP 1 Recharge zones Transect

Study area FP 5 FP 4 FP 3 FP 1 Recharge zones Transect

Hydrogeology unconfined sand upper confined sand Well screens Electrical Resistivity logs

Hydrogeology unconfined sand upper confined sand Well screens Electrical Resistivity logs

Confined and unconfined water-levels Date • many wells are commonly screened in unconfined and

Confined and unconfined water-levels Date • many wells are commonly screened in unconfined and confined layers

Model discretization unconfined sand upper confined sand

Model discretization unconfined sand upper confined sand

Model discretization

Model discretization

Model discretization Specific yield 0. 2 to 0. 25 HK values 0. 3 15

Model discretization Specific yield 0. 2 to 0. 25 HK values 0. 3 15 upper confined-4 Specific -7 1 x 10 7 x 10 Storage sand Fine coarse m/d per meter

Transient stresses • Simulation time – Sept 1944 to Sept 2004 • Seasonal stress

Transient stresses • Simulation time – Sept 1944 to Sept 2004 • Seasonal stress periods – Irrigation pumpage off during winter

Transient stresses • Multi-node wells allow flow through wellbores Halford, K. J. and Hanson,

Transient stresses • Multi-node wells allow flow through wellbores Halford, K. J. and Hanson, R. T. , 2002

Hydrograph comparison unconfined Simulated Observed

Hydrograph comparison unconfined Simulated Observed

Hydrograph comparison confined Simulated Observed

Hydrograph comparison confined Simulated Observed

Hydrograph comparison confined Simulated Observed

Hydrograph comparison confined Simulated Observed

Hydrograph comparison confined Simulated Observed

Hydrograph comparison confined Simulated Observed

Hydrograph comparison unconfined Simulated Observed

Hydrograph comparison unconfined Simulated Observed

Hydrograph comparison unconfined Simulated Observed

Hydrograph comparison unconfined Simulated Observed

Residual Statistics YEAR MEAN MIN MAX RMS MEAN ABS COUNT 1964 0. 08 -2.

Residual Statistics YEAR MEAN MIN MAX RMS MEAN ABS COUNT 1964 0. 08 -2. 33 1. 54 1. 47 1. 20 6 1974 -0. 07 -2. 88 1. 42 1. 29 0. 95 9 1984 0. 10 -2. 18 2. 53 1. 42 1. 00 10 1994 0. 15 -2. 60 1. 75 1. 31 1. 07 12 2004 -0. 26 -3. 12 2. 97 1. 13 0. 76 43 all units in meters Residuals = observed minus simulated

Transport model sub-grid 13 layers (2 -14) 61 rows 122 columns Age & CFC

Transport model sub-grid 13 layers (2 -14) 61 rows 122 columns Age & CFC boundary by layer Version of GWT to support MNW observation wells

Simulated age animation Age, in years 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30

Simulated age animation Age, in years 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Cross-sectional view

Simulated age animation Age, in years 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30

Simulated age animation Age, in years 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Map view cutaway

Age of water vs depth below water table (measured= tritium-helium ages) (unconfined wells only)

Age of water vs depth below water table (measured= tritium-helium ages) (unconfined wells only)

CFC concentration vs depth below water table (confined wells only)

CFC concentration vs depth below water table (confined wells only)

Conclusions • Wellbores drilled through confining units act as “short circuits” for flow •

Conclusions • Wellbores drilled through confining units act as “short circuits” for flow • Simulated transient stresses provide pulses of flow • Transient stresses and wellbores through confining units allow flow and contamination to lower layers

Contact information Brian Clark - brclark@usgs. gov Matt Landon – landon@usgs. gov Leon Kauffman

Contact information Brian Clark - brclark@usgs. gov Matt Landon – landon@usgs. gov Leon Kauffman – lkauff@usgs. gov George Hornberger – gzhornbe@usgs. gov 4/12/2005