Simulation of Moisture Ingression in Microelectronics Package to

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
Simulation of Moisture Ingression in Microelectronics Package to Correlate Accelerated Tests and Field Conditions

Simulation of Moisture Ingression in Microelectronics Package to Correlate Accelerated Tests and Field Conditions Reliability COMSOL Conference Cambridge, September 24 -26, 2019 Simone Sala

Scope of Work 2 • Scope of simulations: understanding moisture ingression in integrated circuits

Scope of Work 2 • Scope of simulations: understanding moisture ingression in integrated circuits package in different environmental conditions (reliability tests and field conditions) to improve comprehension of corrosion phenomena • Plastic packages (molding): • economic and versatile, protects device from any mechanical damage • it is not an hermetic package, it is prone to absorb moisture • Moisture can promote corrosion phenomena: • migrates through molding from external surface to silicon die • leads to corrosive reactions on interconnections metal layer • As worst case condition, delamination between molding and die is also considered introducing a small air gap and simulating moisture behavior inside it

 • Physical Background • J = flux of diffused species • D =

• Physical Background • J = flux of diffused species • D = diffusivity • c = moisture concentration • D 0 = reference diffusivity • Ea = diffusivity activation energy • k = Boltzmann constant • pext = ambient vapor pressure • S = solubility 3

 • COMSOL module: Transport of Diluted Species Simulation Set-up • Boundary conditions: •

• COMSOL module: Transport of Diluted Species Simulation Set-up • Boundary conditions: • evaluation of humidity diffusion only in electronic molding compound (EMC) • humidity absorption from all molding external surfaces • Package technology: • TQFP 64: usage of symmetry function to simulate only ¼ of device • Simulation results: • moisture absorption is evaluated at molding-die interface • Simulation of delamination: • insertion of a thin layer (20 um) between molding and die • moisture absorption is evaluated at air-die interface and at molding-die interface 4

Material Properties • Molding experimental data: • molding absorption curves in standard JEDEC tests

Material Properties • Molding experimental data: • molding absorption curves in standard JEDEC tests temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH) conditions • measurement of weight gain over time (about 340 h) • Molding data required for simulation: • Diffusion coefficient (D): • calculated according to JESD 22 -A 120 • Moisture saturation concentration (csat): • calculated from final sample weight as best fit line • Air data: • taken from literature works • Diffusion coefficient (D): • Moisture saturation concentration (csat): • pws = saturation water pressure • p = atmospheric pressure 5

Simulation Results Temperature Humidity Bias Conditions (No Air Gap) 1/2 Temperature Humidity Bias (THB):

Simulation Results Temperature Humidity Bias Conditions (No Air Gap) 1/2 Temperature Humidity Bias (THB): • Reliability test defined according to standard JEDEC JESD 22 -A 101 • 2000 hours @ 85 °C 85% RH • Molding properties T 85 °C RH 85% D 8. 4 E-13 m 2/s Csat 162 mol/m 3 6

Simulation Results Temperature Humidity Bias Conditions (No Air Gap) 2/2 Animated charts from THB

Simulation Results Temperature Humidity Bias Conditions (No Air Gap) 2/2 Animated charts from THB simulation: 7

Simulation Results Temperature Humidity Bias Conditions (with Air Gap) Temperature Humidity Bias (THB): •

Simulation Results Temperature Humidity Bias Conditions (with Air Gap) Temperature Humidity Bias (THB): • Absorption trends are comparable to those with molding only • Air properties T 85 °C RH 85% D 3. 4 E-5 m 2/s Csat 39 mol/m 3 8

Simulation Results Thermal Humidity Cycling: • Prescribed test conditions are described in standard JESD

Simulation Results Thermal Humidity Cycling: • Prescribed test conditions are described in standard JESD 22 -A 104 E • RH = 93%, T oscillates between 30 °C and 85 °C 9

Simulation Results – Field Conditions 1/2 Climate of Miami (USA): • typical humid subtropical

Simulation Results – Field Conditions 1/2 Climate of Miami (USA): • typical humid subtropical climate (worst case scenario) • weather profile defined using ASHRAE database 10

Simulation Results – Field Conditions 2/2 Climate of Miami (USA): • typical humid subtropical

Simulation Results – Field Conditions 2/2 Climate of Miami (USA): • typical humid subtropical climate (worst case scenario) • weather profile defined using ASHRAE database 11

Acceleration Factor Estimation THB vs Field Conditions • Comparison criteria: cumulative amount of water

Acceleration Factor Estimation THB vs Field Conditions • Comparison criteria: cumulative amount of water absorbed at air-die interface • Orange curve: 1 year absorption trend, Miami worst climatic condition; orange area is total water • Blue curve: THB absorption trend; blue area (light and heavy) is total water • Heavy blue area is equivalent to orange area • 1 year (8760 h) in Miami is equivalent to about 330 h, with an acceleration factor of 27 • During THB, water reaches saturation and condensation occurs, while in field not 12

Conclusions • A model to evaluate moisture diffusion inside molding has been developed using

Conclusions • A model to evaluate moisture diffusion inside molding has been developed using COMSOL Multiphysics • Molding properties have been obtained from absorption curves • Air gap has been introduced to simulate delamination • Different loading conditions have been studied: • Reliability tests: Temperature Humidity Bias, Thermal Humidity Cycling • Field conditions: Miami climate • Comparison between test and field conditions has been done, estimating an acceleration factor 13