Silicon On Insulator Technology NanoMOSFETs with Giga Effects

  • Slides: 67
Download presentation
Silicon On Insulator Technology: Nano-MOSFETs with Giga Effects Sorin Cristoloveanu - Short introduction to

Silicon On Insulator Technology: Nano-MOSFETs with Giga Effects Sorin Cristoloveanu - Short introduction to warm up - Self-heating & Novel SOI materials - Gate tunneling and new floating-body effects - Fringing fields, short-channel effects and scaling - Narrow-channel effects - Extremely thin film effects - Double-gate operation - Fin. FETs and Triple-gate MOSFETs - Four-Gate transistor - Next speaker

SOI Technology - Definition & Questions Definition: SOI is a young technology for the

SOI Technology - Definition & Questions Definition: SOI is a young technology for the future of the microelectronics Questions: • Is SOI really young ? • Is SOI for the future ? • Is the future what it used to be ? Free answers available during lunch … Sorin 20 -05

MOSFET Scaling - Concerns Roadmap Traffic Lights Sorin 30 -01

MOSFET Scaling - Concerns Roadmap Traffic Lights Sorin 30 -01

Why SOI ? Dielectric isolation: vertical and lateral (no latch-up) Vertical junctions: reduced leakage

Why SOI ? Dielectric isolation: vertical and lateral (no latch-up) Vertical junctions: reduced leakage and capacitance Excellent tolerance of transient radiation effects Simpler processing & high flexibility: no wells or trenches Ideal structure for sensors, MEMS, high-temperature devices Attenuated short-channel effects: enhanced scaling Low-voltage & low-power operation: sharp subthreshold swing, reduced leakage, low VT Sorin 20 -05

Self-Heating in SOI MOSFETs Sorin 20 -05

Self-Heating in SOI MOSFETs Sorin 20 -05

Thermal Conductance: Analytical Model • Thermal equivalent circuit • BOX contribution prevails Change the

Thermal Conductance: Analytical Model • Thermal equivalent circuit • BOX contribution prevails Change the BOX material !! Al 2 O 3 BOX Wire Source Wire Gate oxide Si BOX Si Sorin 20 -05 Wire Si. O 2 BOX Drain Gate + S/D α

Solution: Thin Buried Alumina o Si. O 2 BOX ΔT=40°C Al 2 O 3

Solution: Thin Buried Alumina o Si. O 2 BOX ΔT=40°C Al 2 O 3 BOX à Thinner BOX reduces the channel lattice temperature. The advantage of Al 2 O 3 BOX is maintained for thin BOX. Sorin 20 -05

Switching from Si. O 2 to Buried Alumina o Si. O 2 BOX ΔT=

Switching from Si. O 2 to Buried Alumina o Si. O 2 BOX ΔT= 70°C Al 2 O 3 BOX case TSi=10 nm, TBOX=200 nm Shorter channel length (Lg) increases ΔT. à Buried Al 2 O 3 reduces the self-heating by 40 -70°C, especially for small Lg. à Higher mobility: will we need strained Si? Sorin 20 -05

Novel BOX Materials Thermal conductance vs. BOX thickness and vs. Gate length Thinning the

Novel BOX Materials Thermal conductance vs. BOX thickness and vs. Gate length Thinning the BOX (from 400 to 50 nm) is relevant only for Si. O 2, quartz and Al 2 O 3 Sorin 20 -05

Self-Heating vs. Short-Channel Effects Innovative BOX materials … • But, a higher K affects

Self-Heating vs. Short-Channel Effects Innovative BOX materials … • But, a higher K affects the short-channel effects (fringing fields) • Solution: Ground Plane SOI MOSFETs • No trade-off between thermal and electrical performance is necessary … for improved thermal conductance Thick BOX: diamond quartz Thin BOX: Al 2 O 3, Si. C Sorin 20 -05 GP 5 nm 10 nm, no GP

Processing Alumina SOI Wafers Preliminary sequence Smart-Cut sequence Sorin 20 -05

Processing Alumina SOI Wafers Preliminary sequence Smart-Cut sequence Sorin 20 -05

The Horizon: New SOI-like Structures Novel devices with enhanced performance and functionality Si. Ge,

The Horizon: New SOI-like Structures Novel devices with enhanced performance and functionality Si. Ge, Ga. As, Si. C, … XOI SOX UTF 3 -D SON SOI = Semiconductor On Insulator Sorin 30 -01

SOI Wafers: Characterization by Ψ-MOSFET • -MOSFET: in-situ point-contact transistor … just missed by

SOI Wafers: Characterization by Ψ-MOSFET • -MOSFET: in-situ point-contact transistor … just missed by Shockley! • No processing needed • Electrical image of SOI material • electron and hole mobilities • density of interface traps • oxide charges • carrier lifetime • residual doping Cristoloveanu and Williams’ 91 Sorin 20 -05

Ψ-MOSFET Characteristics in state-of-the-art UNIBOND Roadmap: Achieve thinner structures! Results: • High carrier mobilities

Ψ-MOSFET Characteristics in state-of-the-art UNIBOND Roadmap: Achieve thinner structures! Results: • High carrier mobilities • Good uniformity • High quality interface Ø Thin SOI material is available now !! Ø Ultra-thin SOI is under optimization Sorin 20 -05 Agressive thinning is a lot easier when starting from thin SOI!

Floating-Body Effects in PD SOI MOSFETs Kink effect Gate S BOX Substrate Latch &

Floating-Body Effects in PD SOI MOSFETs Kink effect Gate S BOX Substrate Latch & related noise Sorin 20 -05 D

Gate-Induced Floating-Body Effects (GIFBE) A new scaling-related effect: Sorin 20 -05 FBE induced by

Gate-Induced Floating-Body Effects (GIFBE) A new scaling-related effect: Sorin 20 -05 FBE induced by gate tunneling • second peak in transconductance • time & frequency dependent • decreases in shorter or narrower channels [Pretet et al’ 02]

GIFBE : Analysis Gate S D Body BOX Substrate Sorin 20 -05 • The

GIFBE : Analysis Gate S D Body BOX Substrate Sorin 20 -05 • The body potential is defined by the balance between gate-to-body current and recombination current • Suppression of current transients (overshoot & undershoot) • Impact on history effects in ICs

Scanning analysis - Simulations The time dependence is fully reproduced by simulation: Competition between

Scanning analysis - Simulations The time dependence is fully reproduced by simulation: Competition between body charging by gate-to-body tunneling current and capacitive coupling (overshoot : high VB which drops via recombination). For slow scan : - the body charging by the gate current occurs earlier - the 2 nd peak shifts to lower VG Sorin 20 -05

Temporal analysis – experiment VG pulsed from inversion (VGA) to 0. 1 V The

Temporal analysis – experiment VG pulsed from inversion (VGA) to 0. 1 V The transient : - shorter as gate is pulsed from a higher VGA - qualitative modification from overshoot to 'normal' undershoot For high VGB, IGB and VBS are large and the capacitive coupling disappears Þ Body charged by IGB, VB 0 > VB , carrier recombination until VB 0 = VB (overshoot if VGA = 1. 3 & 1. 4 V) Þ Coupling, VB 0 < VB , carrier generation until VB 0 = VB (undershoot if VGA = 1 V) Sorin 20 -05

GIFBE : History Effects and Excess Noise 1. 9 ns 1. 2 V 0.

GIFBE : History Effects and Excess Noise 1. 9 ns 1. 2 V 0. 1 ns Inverter Chain: - 1 st switch slowed down 0 V - 2 nd switch accelerated - Steady-state reached faster T. Poiroux et al. , IEEE Internat. SOI Conf. , pp. 99 -100, Oct. 2002. Sorin 20 -05 1/f + Lorentzian excess noise

GIFBE: Temperature Dependence As T increases, the 2 nd peak is reduced. Why ?

GIFBE: Temperature Dependence As T increases, the 2 nd peak is reduced. Why ? - low T-dependence of the direct gate tunneling current - strong increase of the junction recombination current. Sorin 20 -05

Surprising GIFBE in Fully Depleted MOSFETs • Second peak even for VG 2 =

Surprising GIFBE in Fully Depleted MOSFETs • Second peak even for VG 2 = 0 • More accumulated back interface → higher peak • Model : VT 1 - s 1 -Csi/(Csi + Cox 1) s 2 coupling ID ~ (VG 1 – VT 1) Peak for s 2 / VG 1 ≈ 1 Wrong mobility extraction from peak!!! Sorin 20 -05

Effective Doping: PD-FD Transition Revisited Classical transition : WG = tsi The transition actually

Effective Doping: PD-FD Transition Revisited Classical transition : WG = tsi The transition actually depends on channel length • The doping seen by the gate is lowered by source and drain • As the channel length decreases, the lateral depletion becomes more relevant, and the vertical depletion expands Sorin 20 -05

State-of-the-art SOI MOSFETs Recipe: • Fully depleted • Very short channel (45 nm) •

State-of-the-art SOI MOSFETs Recipe: • Fully depleted • Very short channel (45 nm) • Ultra thin body (10 -15 nm) • Thin BOX (100 nm) • High-K gate insulator • Metal gate • Raised and silicided S & D [Vandooren et al’ 02] Good performance 60 m. V/decade swing Mobility degradation remote Coulomb scattering ? In-situ comparison: Si-Si. O 2 vs. Si-high K Sorin 20 -05

Scaling of SOI MOSFETs Models Intrinsic length λ [Yan’ 92, Monroe ’ 00] λ

Scaling of SOI MOSFETs Models Intrinsic length λ [Yan’ 92, Monroe ’ 00] λ = (tsi tox εsi/ εox)0. 5 or λ = (tsi + tox εsi/εox)/π [Su’ 94] Tolerable short-channel effects for LG 3 λ Message: • worst case: transition from partial to full depletion • use ultra-thin FD films tsi = tox = 1 nm LG = 5 nm !! • doping effect becomes irrelevant : high mobility Sorin 20 -05

Fringing Fields in SOI Medication : • Thin Si film • Thin BOX (not

Fringing Fields in SOI Medication : • Thin Si film • Thin BOX (not too thin!!) • Low-K BOX (SON? ) • Ground-plane (genetics!!) No doping effect below 15 nm ! Sorin 20 -05 Ground plane enables thicker films! Ernst et al’ 99

Narrow-Channel Effects in SOI MOSFETs Classical effects : VT, gm vs. W • Coupling

Narrow-Channel Effects in SOI MOSFETs Classical effects : VT, gm vs. W • Coupling between width, length and thickness • LOCOS : sidewall overdoping less efficient in ultra-thin films • STI : corner effects • Models available Sorin 20 -05 Special SOI Effects : FBE • Subthreshold swing increases in narrow & thick (PD) channels • Attenuated floating-body effects • No models [Pretet’ 01]

Floating-Body Effects in Narrow SOI MOSFETs • Breakdown and snapback voltages increase in narrow

Floating-Body Effects in Narrow SOI MOSFETs • Breakdown and snapback voltages increase in narrow channels • Transients effects are much shorter • Reduced history effects [Pretet’ 01] Sorin 20 -05 Why are FBE attenuated ? • Degraded carrier lifetime on the sidewalls - stress-induced defects ? • Dopant out-diffusion & segregation into the lateral isolation oxide - reduced doping, lower S-body barrier - enhanced junction leakage current

Chopping the SOI MOSFET’s S D + = + Volume ? 10– 18 -

Chopping the SOI MOSFET’s S D + = + Volume ? 10– 18 - 10– 19 cm 3 ! Length 10 nm Thickness 1 nm Width 10 nm • What is the meaning of 1017 cm-3 doping level ? ? • Is the impurity location important ? • A few thousands Si atoms, only. Call them by name! • Modeling and simulation tools • Statistical fluctuations Sorin 20 -05 1 nm - MOSFET

Ultimate Scaling of DG-MOSFETs Intrinsic length • Acceptable short-channel effects if LG 3 =

Ultimate Scaling of DG-MOSFETs Intrinsic length • Acceptable short-channel effects if LG 3 = [(k/2) tsi tox ]0. 5 or = (tsi + 2 ktox )/ with k = si/ ox • Ultra thin SOI films will be necessary for 10 -nm-long DG-MOSFETs Franck ’ 01 L = 2. 5 nm, Likharev’ 03

Ultra Thin Film Effects in SOI MOSFETs 47 nm 8 nm Coupling curves VT

Ultra Thin Film Effects in SOI MOSFETs 47 nm 8 nm Coupling curves VT 1(VG 2) and VT 2(VG 1) - Thick film: the two curves intercept Only point B yields VT 1 and VT 2 !!! - Ultra-thin film: the curves are superposed Sorin et al’ 03 Sorin 20 -05

SOI Dictionary Super-coupling effect Sorin 20 -05

SOI Dictionary Super-coupling effect Sorin 20 -05

Pseudo-Double-Gate Operation Similar front and back inversion charges: What is the correct value of

Pseudo-Double-Gate Operation Similar front and back inversion charges: What is the correct value of VT 1 and VT 2 ? • Thick film: intercept point • Thin film: any value on the common curve ! • Wrong biasing: irrealistic mobility value This relation does not apply to weak inversion : World record : swing 7 m. V/dec !!

Ultimately Thin Double-Gate MOSFETs • 3 -nm-thick DG-MOSFET • simultaneous biasing of front and

Ultimately Thin Double-Gate MOSFETs • 3 -nm-thick DG-MOSFET • simultaneous biasing of front and back gates: VG 2 = 1. 2 VG 1 • outstanding transconductance gain: up to 400% • mobility effect rather than charge effect Impact of volume inversion Cristoloveanu et al’ 99 Sorin 20 -05

Impact of Volume Inversion on Mobility • Dimensional confinement: tsi < 10 nm •

Impact of Volume Inversion on Mobility • Dimensional confinement: tsi < 10 nm • VT increases below 10 nm • Quantum charge distribution totally different from classical profile (Poisson) • Enhanced volume inversion [Sangiorgi et al ’ 98] • SG: more carriers flow near interfaces • DG: most carriers flow far from interfaces - lower vertical field - less roughness-induced scattering - empirical model showing mobility gain [Cristoloveanu et al’ 99] Sorin 20 -05

Carrier Mobility in Ultra Thin SOI MOSFETs • Monte-Carlo simulations indicate [Gamiz’ 01] :

Carrier Mobility in Ultra Thin SOI MOSFETs • Monte-Carlo simulations indicate [Gamiz’ 01] : (including phonon + Coulomb + surface roughness scattering) - enhanced mobility in sub-10 -nm thickness range - higher mobility in DG-MOSFETs • Experiments in MOS-Hall devices demonstrate [Mastrapasqua’ 01] : - impoved mobility in recent SOI materials - good mobility in sub-10 -nm thick MOSFETs Compact models ? ? - higher mobility in DG-MOSFETs

Mobility Issues in Thin SOI MOSFETs Thickness dependence: - reality – additional defects induced

Mobility Issues in Thin SOI MOSFETs Thickness dependence: - reality – additional defects induced by thinning - artefact – channel length effect (impact of series resistance) Higher back channel mobility - electrical (not physical) thickness of gate oxide - infinite back gate overlap [Ohata et al, 2004] Sorin 20 -05

Mobility Issues in Thin SOI MOSFETs Gate Induced Floating Body Effect: - artefact –

Mobility Issues in Thin SOI MOSFETs Gate Induced Floating Body Effect: - artefact – overestimated mobility in accumulation and at low T Volume inversion – carrier speading in the whole film Non-constant vertical film – VT decreases with thickness [Ohata et al, 2004] Sorin 20 -05

Mobility from Magnetoresitance High magnetic field measurements: RB = RS + R 0 (1

Mobility from Magnetoresitance High magnetic field measurements: RB = RS + R 0 (1 + μ 2 B 2) - mobility extraction unaffected by the effective channel length - unlike split-CV, the MR method works even for low inversion charge and back channel measurements [Gallon et al, 2004] Sorin 20 -05

Superior Radiation Hardness of DG-MOSFETs Lower VT shift in DG mode due to volume

Superior Radiation Hardness of DG-MOSFETs Lower VT shift in DG mode due to volume inversion [B. Jun et al, 2004] Experiment Sorin 20 -05 Simulations

Zoo of Double-Gate MOSFETs Technologies: • gate stack • tunnel epitaxy • lateral epi

Zoo of Double-Gate MOSFETs Technologies: • gate stack • tunnel epitaxy • lateral epi growth • bonding • gate-all-around • Delta • Fin-gate • SON Sorin 30 -01

Field-Effect Junctions: Series Resistance Lowering Accumulation layers: Low RS Low RD N VD=1 V

Field-Effect Junctions: Series Resistance Lowering Accumulation layers: Low RS Low RD N VD=1 V Improved gm N 50 -100 Centered Accumulation layer: Low RS P P N 50 -100 Drain Accumulation layer: Low RD N N 50 -100 Source Allibert et al’ 01 Sorin 20 -05

Asymmetrical DG MOSFETs DG mode =-30 nm =-15 nm =0 nm =+15 nm =+30

Asymmetrical DG MOSFETs DG mode =-30 nm =-15 nm =0 nm =+15 nm =+30 nm overlapped Daugé’ 2004

Fin. FETs: Transport Properties 4 channels 2 gates Corners Coupling Models ? ? G

Fin. FETs: Transport Properties 4 channels 2 gates Corners Coupling Models ? ? G Front mobility Lateral mobility N-channel t. Fin Film Back mobility BOX h. Fin P-channel 196 cm 2/Vs Lateral interface 96 cm 2/Vs 677 cm 2/Vs Front interface 163 cm 2/Vs 682 cm 2/Vs Back interface Sorin 20 -05 150 cm 2/Vs

Coupling Effects in Fin. FETs The back channel can be activated by the back

Coupling Effects in Fin. FETs The back channel can be activated by the back gate and also by the front & lateral gates (fringing field) - Front-Back coupling is large in wide fins - Lateral-Back coupling is smaller Gradual activation of various channels: lateral, front, back & corners Lateral channels Front channel Sorin 20 -05 Back channel

The 4 -Gate Transistor : G 4 -MOSFET • Maximum number of gates !

The 4 -Gate Transistor : G 4 -MOSFET • Maximum number of gates ! • G 4 -MOSFET = MOSFET + JFET 2 lateral junction gates JFET mode Front and back gates MOSFET mode • Standard partially-depleted SOI technology • Depletion/accumulation device • Drawn MOSFET length defines width • MOSFET width defines channel length TOX VJG VPG POLY P+ N -BODY n+ S Poly G 1 JG 1 n+ D p+ JG 2 BOX G 2 substrate VBACKGATE Sorin 20 -05 n-channel G 4 -FET P+ Cross-section view n-channel p+ Cristoloveanu et al’ 02

G 4 -MOSFET: Typical Characteristics VG 1= 1 V VG 2= 10 V 250

G 4 -MOSFET: Typical Characteristics VG 1= 1 V VG 2= 10 V 250 200 Back MOS VJG = 0 V Back gate + 150 VG 1 = 1 V VG 2 = 0 V 100 Front-gate MOSFET action Front MOS } 50 0 0 Modulation by 1 2 3 Sorin 20 -05 VJG = 0 V JFET VJG = -0. 4 V VJG = -1. 6 V VG 1 = 0 V VG 2 = 0 V Junction-gate JFET action

G 4 -MOSFET: Typical Characteristics • Current control by either front gate or junction

G 4 -MOSFET: Typical Characteristics • Current control by either front gate or junction gates • Back-gate depletion makes easier device cut-off (full depletion) • Top and back gate accumulation enables large currents • Applications: mixed signals, low-power modulation, RF mixers • New logic families: quaternary logic Sorin 20 -05

G 4 -FET: Conduction Mechanisms • G 4 -FET is a combination of JFET

G 4 -FET: Conduction Mechanisms • G 4 -FET is a combination of JFET and “pure” volume conduction accumulation mode MOSFET: quantum wire!! MOS action: vertical depletion & carrier accumulation JFET action: lateral depletion & width control • 3 current components: volume current top interface accumulation current back interface accumulation current volume + back interface depleted volume + top interface neutral volume + top + back interface accumulated

G 4–FET in Depletion-All-Arround Mode Good performance with depleted interfaces Even better if both

G 4–FET in Depletion-All-Arround Mode Good performance with depleted interfaces Even better if both interfaces are inverted: - enhanced action of the lateral gates - nearly ideal swing - improved transconductance - double shielding effect ++++++++ Sorin 20 -05

G 4–FET in Depletion-All-Arround Mode More advantages in DAA mode (both interfaces inverted): -

G 4–FET in Depletion-All-Arround Mode More advantages in DAA mode (both interfaces inverted): - very high gm/ID ratio and Early voltage - very low noise - radiation hardness [Akarvardar et al, 2004] Sorin 20 -05

Do we need a conclusion ? ? Context: - SOI is no longer a

Do we need a conclusion ? ? Context: - SOI is no longer a promising technology - SOI is the necessary technology - Si. Ge, Ge or strained Si are not alternatives to SOI … should be SOI-like Challenges for advanced SOI MOS scaling: • SOI wafers with thin layers and novel materials • thin BOX or other types of BOX => relax self-heating • ultra-thin gate oxides => new Gate-Induced FBEs => • the transistor body will be thinnest layer • ultra-thin silicon films => super-coupling effects & series R • multiple gate transistors: new quantum and transport effects

Questions & More Questions Video Tutorial SOI Technologies: Materials, Devices, Characterization, and Ultimate Architectures

Questions & More Questions Video Tutorial SOI Technologies: Materials, Devices, Characterization, and Ultimate Architectures http: //isde. vanderbilt. edu/download. php Sorin 20 -05

Even More Questions Sorin 20 -05

Even More Questions Sorin 20 -05

SOI Technology - Definition & Questions Definition: SOI is a young technology for the

SOI Technology - Definition & Questions Definition: SOI is a young technology for the future of the microelectronics • Is SOI really young ? Yes, 30 -35 years only No, twice as old as the lifetime left • Is SOI for the future ? (Yes)2 ! Bulk cannot make it. There is nothing left, but SOI ! • Is the future what it used to be ? No, because SOI allows expanding the frontiers ! Sorin 20 -05

Scanning analysis - Simulations The time dependence is fully reproduced by simulation: Competition between

Scanning analysis - Simulations The time dependence is fully reproduced by simulation: Competition between body charging by gate-to-body tunneling current and capacitive coupling (overshoot : high VB which drops via recombination). For slow scan : - the body charging by the gate current occurs earlier - the 2 nd peak shifts to lower VG Sorin 20 -05

Distribution of Fringing Fields in SOI MOSFETs Analytical model based on conformal mapping Ernst

Distribution of Fringing Fields in SOI MOSFETs Analytical model based on conformal mapping Ernst et al’ 99 Sorin 20 -05

SOI MOSFET – Passport Photo Sorin 20 -05

SOI MOSFET – Passport Photo Sorin 20 -05

G 4 -FET: Modeling How can a partially depleted body become fully depleted ?

G 4 -FET: Modeling How can a partially depleted body become fully depleted ? Concentration • The doping seen by one gate is lowered by the other gates • Concept of effective doping • The depletion region is expanded: the G 4 -FET can be turned off Sorin 20 -05

Effective Doping: PD-FD Transition Revisited Classical transition : WG = tsi The transition actually

Effective Doping: PD-FD Transition Revisited Classical transition : WG = tsi The transition actually depends on channel length • The doping seen by the gate is lowered by source and drain • Doping-Length transformation ; see also Doping-Voltage transformation [Magy’ 88] 5 1017 Neff 4 1017 3 1017 2 1017 1 1017 S D 0 -1 1017 Sorin 20 -05

Quantum Wires on SOI 1 -nm channel width !

Quantum Wires on SOI 1 -nm channel width !

Drain Current Transients VG: 0 20 V Higher lifetime longer transients Transient 10 nm

Drain Current Transients VG: 0 20 V Higher lifetime longer transients Transient 10 nm films are dominated by interface recombination very short transients VG: 0 40 V Epitaxial regrowth improves lifetime eff - fewer G-R centers by additional anneals (or by defect dispersion) - attenuated influence of the interfaces Many thanks to N. Bresson Sorin 20 -05

Ψ-MOSFET in Ultra Thin SOI Wafers Thinning + Epitaxial regrowth In ultra-thin films: •

Ψ-MOSFET in Ultra Thin SOI Wafers Thinning + Epitaxial regrowth In ultra-thin films: • Csi >> Cox, Cit • Swing increases as 1/tsi • Agreement with model • Dit below detection limit • Mobility decreases: Why ? Sorin 20 -05

Self-Heating in SOI MOSFETs Sorin 20 -05

Self-Heating in SOI MOSFETs Sorin 20 -05

Self-Heating in SOI MOSFETs Sorin 20 -05

Self-Heating in SOI MOSFETs Sorin 20 -05