Ship Map Movie 1 Movie 2 Movie 3

  • Slides: 53
Download presentation

트리즈의 목표 : 이상해결책 Ship Map Movie 1 Movie 2 Movie 3 5 Movie

트리즈의 목표 : 이상해결책 Ship Map Movie 1 Movie 2 Movie 3 5 Movie 4

L사 D사 SAMSUNG Zipel Quiz: World Trade Center Example 7

L사 D사 SAMSUNG Zipel Quiz: World Trade Center Example 7

트리즈의 역사, 알츠슐러가 만들다 • 1926 15 th October • 1940 First Invention (13

트리즈의 역사, 알츠슐러가 만들다 • 1926 15 th October • 1940 First Invention (13 -year-old) • 1946 Military serves in Patent department • 1946 Start of TRIZ development (20 yr) • 1949 Two Grand Prix in inventors competition (23 yr), Letter to Stalin, Arrest • 1956 Freedom, first publication in journal • 1958 Journalist and Science Fiction • 1961 First book about TRIZ • 1971 Lecture at University in Baku • 1974 Publication Abroad (Japan) • 1981 More than 300 school in USSR • TRIZCON held & AI established in USA 9

모순의 개념을 찾아 내다 • 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction” Problem solving called “Inventive”

모순의 개념을 찾아 내다 • 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction” Problem solving called “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4) Removal of Contradiction Breakthrough The typical engineering approach is to compromise, but that approach does not lead to an invention. An Invention surmounts the contradiction. 10

혁신적 발명은 모순을 극복하는 것이다 Problem solving called “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4) Removing

혁신적 발명은 모순을 극복하는 것이다 Problem solving called “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4) Removing Contradiction 11 Breakthrough

모순에 대한 분석: 두 가지 종류의 모순 創意적 발명들의 공통점 Two Kinds of Contradiction

모순에 대한 분석: 두 가지 종류의 모순 創意적 발명들의 공통점 Two Kinds of Contradiction 矛盾을 제거 革新 Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction Technical Contradiction 40 Principles Physical Contradiction Separation Principles 12

물리적 모순 해결책에 대한 분석: 분리의 원 리 Physical Contradiction Separation Principles Analysis and

물리적 모순 해결책에 대한 분석: 분리의 원 리 Physical Contradiction Separation Principles Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction 析 分 1. Separation in TIME 2. Separation in SPACE 3. Separation in SCALE 13

시간에 의한 분리의 예 Physical Contradiction Separation Principles 1. Separation in TIME 2. Separation

시간에 의한 분리의 예 Physical Contradiction Separation Principles 1. Separation in TIME 2. Separation in SPACE 3. Separation in SCALE 14

기술적 모순 해결책에 대한 분석: 40가지 발명원리 Technical Contradiction 40 Principles & 39 Engineering

기술적 모순 해결책에 대한 분석: 40가지 발명원리 Technical Contradiction 40 Principles & 39 Engineering Parameters Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction 析 分 18 Mechanical vibration 37 Thermal expansion …… 40 Composite Material 1 Length of moving object 2 Speed 3 Force …… 15

모순 테이블(Contradiction Matrix)의 착안 16

모순 테이블(Contradiction Matrix)의 착안 16

자원의 활용, 물질-장 분석 • 1956 ~ 1970 : Resource In every technological system,

자원의 활용, 물질-장 분석 • 1956 ~ 1970 : Resource In every technological system, one can discern two objects or substances, S 1 and S 2. [ex : two parts of system the system itself and its product the system and its environment] These substances interact or communicate through a field, F. [ex : Mechanical Acoustic Thermal Chemical Electric Magnetic etc] The relationship between the field and the two substances can be expressed in a Su-Field triangle. This triangle diagram may be thought of the technological system. It is of course a very simple, abstract model. More detailed models can be made by adding more nodes, linking triangles together, etc. Quiz: Mac. Guiver 20

자원의 활용, 물질-장 분석 These diagram can be made more informative by introducing different

자원의 활용, 물질-장 분석 These diagram can be made more informative by introducing different line symbols for the connections between nodes. If a Su-Field diagram contains dashed or wavy lines, then the system it represents needs improvement ie, an inventive problem. The solution to this inventive problem may also be presented by a Su-Field diagram, which would be a modification of the original diagram. 76 Standard Solutions 21

자원의 활용, 물질-장 분석 If a Su-Field diagram contains dashed or wavy lines, then

자원의 활용, 물질-장 분석 If a Su-Field diagram contains dashed or wavy lines, then the system it represents needs improvement ie, an inventive problem. The solution to this inventive problem may also be presented by a Su-Field diagram, which would be a modification of the original diagram. 76 Standard Solutions 22

물질-장 분석 예제 76 Standard Solutions 23

물질-장 분석 예제 76 Standard Solutions 23

자원의 활용, 다차원 분석 Super System ! System ? Sub System OK Past Present

자원의 활용, 다차원 분석 Super System ! System ? Sub System OK Past Present 24 Future

다차원 분석의 예 Multi-Screen 25

다차원 분석의 예 Multi-Screen 25

PDP 발광효율 개선 사례 PDP 는 LCD 에 비해서 높은 소비 전력을 요구하는 단점

PDP 발광효율 개선 사례 PDP 는 LCD 에 비해서 높은 소비 전력을 요구하는 단점 선진 업체 발광효율은 1. 5 lm/w Upper Glass Dielectric Layer X Mg. O Layer Y ITO Address Bus address Buss address (scan) Side Wall Address Electrode Rear Glass Z Luminance layer 27 1. 200 V 로 방전(벼락치기) 2. Xe 가스 이온화, 들뜬 상태 3. Xe 에 의해 자외선 방출 4. 형광체가 자외선 흡수 5. 형광체가 발광

문제해결 알고리듬, 아리즈(ARIZ) • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Attention! ARIZ is

문제해결 알고리듬, 아리즈(ARIZ) • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Attention! ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study. 32

문제해결 알고리듬, 아리즈(ARIZ) • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Step 1. Analyzing

문제해결 알고리듬, 아리즈(ARIZ) • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Step 1. Analyzing the Problem 1. 1. formulate the mini-problem 1. 2. define the conflicting elements 1. 3. describe graphic models for technical contradiction 1. 4. select a graphic model for further analysis 1. 5. intensify the conflict 1. 6. describe the problem model 1. 7. apply the inventive standards Step 2. Analyzing the Problem Model 2. 1. define the operational zone (oz) 2. 2. define the operational time (ot) 2. 3. define the substance-field resources (sfr) 33

문제해결 알고리듬, 아리즈(ARIZ) • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Step 3. Defining

문제해결 알고리듬, 아리즈(ARIZ) • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Step 3. Defining Ideal Final Result (IFR) and Physical Contradiction (Ph. C) 3. 1. formulate IFR-1 3. 2. intensify definition of IFR-1 3. 3. Identify the physical contradiction for the macro-level 3. 4. Identify the physical contradiction for the micro-level 3. 5. formulate IFR-2 3. 6. apply the inventive standards to resolved physical contradiction Step 4. Mobilizing and Utilizing of Substance-Field Resources (SFR) 4. 1. simulation with little creatures 4. 2. to take a"step back" from IFR 4. 3. using combination of substance resources 4. 4. using "void" 4. 5. using derived resources 4. 6. using an electrical field 4. 7. using a field and field-sensitive substance 34

문제해결 알고리듬, 아리즈(ARIZ) • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Attention! ARIZ is

문제해결 알고리듬, 아리즈(ARIZ) • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Attention! ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study. Step 5. Apply the Knowledge Base 5. 1. applying the system of standard solutions for inventive problems 5. 2. applying the problem-analogous 5. 3. applying the principles for resolving the physical contradictions 5. 4. applying the pointer to physical effects and phenomena Step 6. Changing or Substituting the Problem 6. 1. transition to the technical solution 6. 2. checking the problem formulation for combination of several problems 6. 3. changing the problem 6. 4. reformulation of mini-problem 35

문제해결 알고리듬, 아리즈(ARIZ) • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Step 7. Analyzing

문제해결 알고리듬, 아리즈(ARIZ) • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Step 7. Analyzing the Method of Resolving the Physical Contradiction 7. 1 checking the concept of solution 7. 2. preliminary estimation of the solution concept 7. 3. checking the priority of the solution through patent funds 7. 4. estimation of sub-problems to implement obtained solution concept Step 8. Applying The Obtained Solution 8. 1. estimate of changes for super-system 8. 2. find new application for obtained solution 8. 3. apply solution concept for other problems Step 9. Analyzing the Problem Solving Process 9. 1. compare proposed process and real 9. 2. compare obtained solution concept and knowledge from TRIZ 36