Share Point plans Have you implemented Microsoft Share

Share. Point plans Have you implemented Microsoft Share. Point 2007 (WSS/MOSS) in your organization? 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% No, and we have no plans to No, but plan to in next 12 -18 months No, but we use Share. Point 2003 Yes, we have implementations under way Yes, we have Windows Share. Point Services 3. 0 (WSS) in use. Yes, we have Office Share. Point Server 2007 (MOSS) in use. Not sure what Share. Point is Page 1 50% of organizations polled using or implementing Share. Point All respondents (406)

Share. Point governance Use of Share. Point with regard to existing ECM, DM and RM suite 0% 10% 20% Works in competition Who is driving and controlling Share. Point sites and applications 30% 0% 10% Records Management Works in parallel Fills in some functions Is integrated with our existing suites Sits on top of our DM/RM repository Share. Point is our ECM suit None of these 31% conflict between existing ECM and Share. Point Page 2 IT with input from Records Management IT with no input from Records Management No one, but we have set up rules and metadata guidelines No one, and it's completely out-of-control Governance is an issue for 44% Share. Point users (233) 20% 30% 40% 50%

Strategy Are you using or do you have immediate plans to use Share. Point in the following applications? 0% 20% 40% Collaboration/workspaces 60% 80% 100% Collaboration #1, then DM Then Portal Document management (check in/check. . . Portal Web content management (internal/staff-. . . File share replacement Enterprise 2. 0 (Forums, Blogs & Wikis) Enterprise Search Business Process Management (Workflow) Forms processing Records management Web content management (external/www) Scanning and imaging 170 Share. Point Users, >500 emps. Business Intelligence (BI) Email management Current Planned Page 3

Governance Which of the following policies do you currently have in place for your Share. Point implementation? 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Policy on who can set up a team site, and their responsibilities Policy on roles, administrative rights and access Only 50% have policies in place. Approved site design templates User training plan Aministrator training plan Guidance on corporate classification and use of content types and columns Quotas (numbers/storage) by user, by sites, etc. Guidance on published content exposed to staff or public Restrictions on stored content with regard to security – eg, HR, Finance Guidance on use and longevity of blogs, projects and long-term sites End-of-life policy for sites and contents Policy on use of third party products and web parts Legal discovery procedures None of these >10 employees Not ECM suppliers: Page 4