Setting up a Rapid Reporting System for suicide prevention: Registrar experience and reflections Dr Alexandra Smith ST 2 Public Health, Camden & Islington 20 th June 2017
Rapid Reporting System for suicide prevention • Inputs • Central process • Outputs
SWOT analysis Strengths Weaknesses • Stakeholder engagement • Political expediency • Using Data Better • Resource/time limitations • Scope: tradeoffs • Positioning: ‘strategy’? Opportunities Threats • Strong collaborations • National policy context • Other localities • Engagement difficulties • Information governance • Regional element to work
Registrar role: Skills & challenges • Project management • Stakeholder engagement & relationship management • Coordinating the working group • Developing the model • Working with wider team
Progress report • Close to starting data collection • Ongoing difficulties – Engagement of certain key stakeholders – Complex information governance issues – Regional work • Developing postvention support and training offers
Thank you. Any questions? With many thanks to: • Jonathan O’Sullivan and Jane Brett-Jones • And to colleagues in Thames Valley, County Durham and Derbyshire who shared their experiences with us.