SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF

  • Slides: 16
Download presentation
SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

THE NEED FOR EVALUATION • To identify and establish institutional objectives • To try

THE NEED FOR EVALUATION • To identify and establish institutional objectives • To try and attain such goals • To set standards of performance based on the purpose of the institution and its desired objectives

MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION (INSTITUTIONAL) • To focus on purpose and goals • To make

MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION (INSTITUTIONAL) • To focus on purpose and goals • To make course corrections • To plan systemic changes

INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION • To promote performance • To check, arrest and weed out nonperformance

INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION • To promote performance • To check, arrest and weed out nonperformance

USE TO THE INSTITUTION • Help identify merit based on institutional parameters • Help

USE TO THE INSTITUTION • Help identify merit based on institutional parameters • Help detect personal deficiencies for correction • Help discover the rotten apples

MODE OF EVALUATION • Set the parameters • Determine the modes for assessment •

MODE OF EVALUATION • Set the parameters • Determine the modes for assessment • Arrive at the parameters and the method of assessment in consultation with judicial officers

THE PRESENT SYSTEM • • Unit method Judgments appraisal Complaints Subjective personal perception

THE PRESENT SYSTEM • • Unit method Judgments appraisal Complaints Subjective personal perception

THE DESIRED PROCESS • Based more on objectivity or, at least, subjective satisfaction of

THE DESIRED PROCESS • Based more on objectivity or, at least, subjective satisfaction of objective criteria • Based more on promoting merit and good quality • A process in which comparison would be possible • Demerit should be dealt with in punishments, unless used as a tool in comparison

WHAT SHOULD BE THE ATTRIBUTES (I) • • Patience in hearing (qualified) Behaviour Acumen

WHAT SHOULD BE THE ATTRIBUTES (I) • • Patience in hearing (qualified) Behaviour Acumen and knowledge Disposal Perception as to integrity Quality of judgments Punctuality – in court, in orders and in making orders available

ATTRIBUTES (II) • • Speed in understanding Communication with lawyers in court Quality of

ATTRIBUTES (II) • • Speed in understanding Communication with lawyers in court Quality of judgments Clarity in judgments and orders Speed of disposal Equal treatment to all Openness of mind

SUGGESTIONS • • Qualities and attitudes Functional skills Domain skills Knowledge

SUGGESTIONS • • Qualities and attitudes Functional skills Domain skills Knowledge

QUALITIES AND ATTITUDES • • • Faith in Constitutional values Personal rectitude Commitment to

QUALITIES AND ATTITUDES • • • Faith in Constitutional values Personal rectitude Commitment to personal service Openness and human empathy Vision Decisiveness

FUNCTIONAL SKILLS Listening, including active listening Reading Speaking Writing Analysis – logic and reasoning

FUNCTIONAL SKILLS Listening, including active listening Reading Speaking Writing Analysis – logic and reasoning English language and communication (including non-verbal communication) • Dispute settlement, negotiation, bargaining abilities • • •

DOMAIN SKILLS • Appreciation of facts • Finding and appreciation of the law •

DOMAIN SKILLS • Appreciation of facts • Finding and appreciation of the law • Judging and decision-making; responsiveness in judging • Managing the adjudication process; teamwork abilities • Judgment writing • Administrative abilities • Foreseeing the impact of judicial decisions

KNOWLEDGE • Basic legal knowledge • Awareness of key social challenges, including the history

KNOWLEDGE • Basic legal knowledge • Awareness of key social challenges, including the history of the Constitution • Jurisprudence • Development of the laws

FINALLY • Identification of who will assess • Allocation of weights to the different

FINALLY • Identification of who will assess • Allocation of weights to the different parameters • Use of technology both in evaluation and in managing the process of evaluation